Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I checked with admin prior, the respect of partisan behavior toward artistic satire and freedom of speech can be reported other ways than that picture,and no points were issued. Have a great night
yea but the effigy was the satire and the woman who knocked it down was the violators.
The pic was a necessary evil not meant to break the rules and hardly pornographic.

But no big deal, Whiskey.
Oh yea, points...
Enjoy your evening.
 

Arthur

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The real good news is those Canadians aint going to the world series !

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Hazey your not in you faraday cage? Im in mine

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
As am I, @Arthur. My comment was meant as advice to those not as fortunate as us,
and to the purveyors of the tin foil cap myth.
Wearing one is futile unless properly grounded. That applies to faraday cages too.
I have a propeller beanie with neodymium magnets superglued to the propeller.
It runs on USB also. The spinning magnets confound the ELF waves
being emitted from the cellphone towers.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
That one, and a nekkid picture of Melania Trump used in a campaign add.

It's politics.
you can have nekkid as long as no nipples or other sex organs show.
I think stripper nipple stars and band aid nipples may be cool.
 

f1r3b1rd

https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
you can have nekkid as long as no nipples or other sex organs show.
I think stripper nipple stars and band aid nipples may be cool.

I wouldn't know, the rule is kinda ambiguous. It pretty much implies that the mods decide. Which is fine. I guess if I post one that doesn't pass, they'll delete it because while I'm aware of the rule, I figured it covered pictures of pornographic intent and not so much for other, less 'risque', type stuff.

I mean, who wants to see Hitlery's real saggy boobs? A caricature isn't usually considered lewd or pornographic. They're kinda common. It was wearing it's granny panties. LOL
 

f1r3b1rd

https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
whose the daddy
 

UncleRJ

Will write reviews for Beer!
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Reviewer
Moderator

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I wouldn't know, the rule is kinda ambiguous. It pretty much implies that the mods decide. Which is fine. I guess if I post one that doesn't pass, they'll delete it because while I'm aware of the rule, I figured it covered pictures of pornographic intent and not so much for other, less 'risque', type stuff.

I mean, who wants to see Hitlery's real saggy boobs? A caricature isn't usually considered lewd or pornographic. They're kinda common. It was wearing it's granny panties. LOL

Reply to first paragraph: Exactly. Agree on all counts.
Reply to second paragraph: I'd like to see Hitlery's sagging boobs.
Correct, caricatures are satire. Any lewdness would be in the mind of the perceiver. <---vu spell checker doesn't know this word
and not a matter of intent unless the satire was pornographic
like say a drawing of a sexually explicit act symbolizing America getting screwed by Obummer.

But arguing the subtleties of semantics is a ludicrous endeavor best chuckled about and ignored.
It's only bullshit on the internet...
 

UncleRJ

Will write reviews for Beer!
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Reviewer
Moderator
Yea, you should see the pic w/o the blacked out nips.
I had a large one up but it's against the rules...


Please feel free to send me the link via PM!
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Debate commentary...

Are the 17 "intelligence agencies" that have concluded that Russia is the source of the Wikileaks documents the same agencies that concluded that Saddam had large quantities of WMDs?
Excellent point.
I'll not debate that the Russians and Chinese do some cyberspying but the wikileaks
hacks were done by groups not affiliated with the establishment. Those 17 intelligence agencies have been ordered to validate false accusations in order to justify actions hostile to the Ruskies.
 

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Excellent point.
I'll not debate that the Russians and Chinese do some cyberspying but the wikileaks
hacks were done by groups not affiliated with the establishment. Those 17 intelligence agencies have been ordered to validate false accusations in order to justify actions hostile to the Ruskies.
Why do we have/need SEVENTEEN "intelligence agencies" anyway?
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Why do we have/need SEVENTEEN "intelligence agencies" anyway?
Yea, seems like overkill. Bureaucratic bullshit. Most of those agents are incompetent and the few that aren't are muzzled by the administration. Think civil servants going through the motions..like the post office.
 

f1r3b1rd

https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
wow this is the best we got?


we are so screwed.....
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Debate commentary...

Are the 17 "intelligence agencies" that have concluded that Russia is the source of the Wikileaks documents the same agencies that concluded that Saddam had large quantities of WMDs?

That's exactly what what I would have said.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The CNN talking heads are busy bashing Trump for not saying he would accept the results of the election on the 9th.

Sorry, but that's brilliant. I think that he was not denied the nomination through GOP convention trick because he brought attention to it BEFORE it happened. Bringing up election rigging before the election has a much better chance of stopping it than an after the fact statement. If there is rigging and nobody says anything until after the fact, nothing will be done about it.

They are simply trying to buttonhole him into accepting a fraudulent election beforehand. He was smart enough to not bite.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The CNN talking heads are busy bashing Trump for not saying he would accept the results of the election on the 9th.

Sorry, but that's brilliant. I think that he was not denied the nomination through GOP convention trick because he brought attention to it BEFORE it happened. Bringing up election rigging before the election has a much better chance of stopping it than an after the fact statement. If there is rigging and nobody says anything until after the fact, nothing will be done about it.

They are simply trying to buttonhole him into accepting a fraudulent election beforehand. He was smart enough to not bite.

Yea, the commentators at ABC are saying the same. He didn't say he wouldn't. He said he would decide at the time.
Given all the cloak and dagger maneuvers of her campaign exposed recently and similar accusations of fraud levied at her by Bernie's campaign I wouldn't pledge my acceptance. I would leave it open to challenge the vote like Al gore did.
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Frankly I wasn't impressed. He struck a nerve with Killary a couple of times
where she tensed up but he had an angry baby pout throughout the debate.

I was impressed the 2nd and this one...
Hillary was a BITCH THOUGH!!


Take ur meds NARCIS
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The CNN talking heads are busy bashing Trump for not saying he would accept the results of the election on the 9th.

Sorry, but that's brilliant. I think that he was not denied the nomination through GOP convention trick because he brought attention to it BEFORE it happened. Bringing up election rigging before the election has a much better chance of stopping it than an after the fact statement. If there is rigging and nobody says anything until after the fact, nothing will be done about it.

They are simply trying to buttonhole him into accepting a fraudulent election beforehand. He was smart enough to not bite.
same fucks that gave Al Gore legitamacy when he cried foul.....I dont remember anyone in the media calling Al Gore a loony for it.
 
Last edited:

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I was impressed the 2nd and this one...
Hillary was a BITCH THOUGH!!


Take ur meds NARCIS
Hitlery is a bitch, EJ. She was only being herself.
I was impressed the first and more impressed with Trump than on the first one.
This debate lacked oomph, though the networks are all saying it was heated and hostile
I didn't see anything I liked other than his talk on full term abortion.
That will earn him the Christian and especially the Catholic vote after the leaked anti-catholic emails
but not the non religious vote.
 

CashNVape

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
That must have been a pic of an effigy of a naked Hitlery Clinton.
I'm going to have to read the rules again
'cause I posted a pic of a work of art not a photograph of a naked woman.
I have a few, legit leaked pics.
Don't judge me
Doubt they can be posted here, but no one said we can't trade via pm! "loop hole"

Sent from a phone
 

f1r3b1rd

https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
its pretty clear that winner tonight was johnson
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Hitlery is a bitch, EJ. She was only being herself.
I was impressed the first and more impressed with Trump than on the first one.
This debate lacked oomph, though the networks are all saying it was heated and hostile
I didn't see anything I liked other than his talk on full term abortion.
That will earn him the Christian and especially the Catholic vote after the leaked anti-catholic emails
but not the non religious vote.

Grab the pussy
Rip the baby
I love the orange man..


Take ur meds NARCIS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top