National view: Lung cancer battle raises concerns about e-cigs, other ‘nicotine-delivery devices’

The bullshit lying politicians wife's view

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/op...cer-battle-raises-concerns-about-e-cigs-other

The hard working vaping advocate and facebook friend of mine's view

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/op...-view-e-cigarettes-prevent-nicotine-addiction

I think i'm going to trust the latter opinion.

How about you guys? - 5150

5150sick said:

The bullshit lying politicians wife's view

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/op...cer-battle-raises-concerns-about-e-cigs-other

The hard working vaping advocate and facebook friend of mine's view

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/op...-view-e-cigarettes-prevent-nicotine-addiction

I think i'm going to trust the latter opinion.

How about you guys? - 5150

Click to expand...

I agree to a extent. However, when comparing to usage: the writer Jerry Lozzo states PG is in consumable items such as toothpaste. As vapor-ers we are not consuming pg via gastrointestinal/dermal application. We are inhaling this product.
In regards to Mary Nolan's view: she is talking out of her ass. Anyone can have a opinion but it means nothing without credentials, cites and scientific proof of discovery.

The original article starts out pretty well, pointing out that there are plenty of never-smokers who get lung cancer, but due to the stigma of its association with smoking, the amount of research that's done is less than it might otherwise be. OK. But then it goes off the rails with utterly baseless scare-mongering regarding PG. It's my understanding that PG has been extensively tested for inhalation safety for many decades. <SMH>