Become a Patron!

GOVERNMENT WATCH!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Artemis

Gold Contributor
Member For 5 Years
Of course!
TrumpCat.JPG
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Sing it Bernie! Those god damn rich people are fucking up your country, ain't they? Mother fuckin rich ass bitchez. :xD:

Jealous much?

sanders%20teaser%202.jpg
Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).

No, I'm not jealous. I've been there, and I'm not proud of it. I'll get back someday, or maybe not. But I'll be able to sleep at night, regardless.
If one were to go back far enough in time, one would remember the Democrats were once the conservative, racist, nationalist party. In order to obscure the fact that the roles between the Republicans and Democrats flipped more than 100 years ago, many people bent on obfuscation will bring up the entirely out-of-context point that nearly two centuries ago it was a Republican president that used the guise of ending slavery as a rallying cry to end the Civil War, completely ignoring the role of the Republican party over the course of their own lifetimes. Is that where you're taking this?
I know about all that Bird. Time isn't one of those people though. There are two kinds of horse "farms". The ones (very few) who have horses like Rolls Royce's. It's BIG money.
Then there are those who are not (most). They think they are in tall cotton when they sell a colt for a couple thousand. They spend all their time being "horse" people. Life revolves around horses and making a meager buck.

Were Time really one of those that made big money in horses, he wouldn't be here. He would be way more occupied with making money with his horses. Add to that, how many times he's said he avoids taxes at all costs. That's not a sign of anyone successful in business. That's someone who makes a meager income and thinks they are sticking it to "the man", when if they spent as much energy being successful instead of avoiding taxes, they would likely BE wealthy.
In my early twenties, I paid more in taxes each year that I've made annually over the last few years. I didn't bitch then, and I don't bitch now - except for the Obamacare tax that says I should be penalized by having to pay extra taxes because I can't afford to purchase insurance from a private company that I may or may not want to buy anyway. All the wingnuts on the right get caught up in calling Obama a socialist, but the fact his key legislative legacy forces private citizens to buy a product they may not want from a corporate entity makes him more of a fascist in my mind than anything else. If I continue working as hard as I have, I have some faith that at some point in the future I'll once again be paying more in taxes than the average government employee clears in a year. And if I'm so fortunate I'll be thankful that I'm in a place to do so rather than bitter about it. If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...

Exactlly the only appointments he's made I really like are Bannon and Jeff Sessions.... and mad dog...that being said the images of what Hilary would have nominated would have been reminiscent of the Red Guard...or Cruz ...god only knows a tent revival meeting?...Rubio what ever the Bush family told him to do.....I'm pissed about some of it, but I still believe we missed a really big bullet this election.....Hilary would have been disasterous.....but it changes nothing it is still up to us to be active and vocal about our goverment..
So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite. You seem disappointed he didn't nominate more people from the same vein. We can agree to disagree on this one - you've (finally) made your voice clear. I understand what you're saying. I wholeheartedly disagree with you, but at least you've coherently conveyed your views.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).

No, I'm not jealous. I've been there, and I'm not proud of it. I'll get back someday, or maybe not. But I'll be able to sleep at night, regardless.

If one were to go back far enough in time, one would remember the Democrats were once the conservative, racist, nationalist party. In order to obscure the fact that the roles between the Republicans and Democrats flipped more than 100 years ago, many people bent on obfuscation will bring up the entirely out-of-context point that nearly two centuries ago it was a Republican president that used the guise of ending slavery as a rallying cry to end the Civil War, completely ignoring the role of the Republican party over the course of their own lifetimes. Is that where you're taking this?

In my early twenties, I paid more in taxes each year that I've made annually over the last few years. I didn't bitch then, and I don't bitch now - except for the Obamacare tax that says I should be penalized by having to pay extra taxes because I can't afford to purchase insurance from a private company that I may or may not want to buy anyway. All the wingnuts on the right get caught up in calling Obama a socialist, but the fact his key legislative legacy forces private citizens to buy a product they may not want from a corporate entity makes him more of a fascist in my mind than anything else. If I continue working as hard as I have, I have some faith that at some point in the future I'll once again be paying more in taxes than the average government employee clears in a year. And if I'm so fortunate I'll be thankful that I'm in a place to do so rather than bitter about it. If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...


So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite. You seem disappointed he didn't nominate more people from the same vein. We can agree to disagree on this one - you've (finally) made your voice clear. I understand what you're saying. I wholeheartedly disagree with you, but at least you've coherently conveyed your views.
What a pathetic little twat...Jeff Sessions is endorsed by more black people than you've ever seen in your entire life...he prosecuted and demanded a life senentnce against the head of the kkk in his home state...It's twats like you who got Trump elected...people so void of intellect or integrity that anyone that dissented against your world view wasn't met by rationale argumnets but was just smeared with cries of..racist..homophobe...mysoginist....Islamphobe...if you bothered to pull your head out of the sand, you may have realized that leftist smearing didn't work this election..not only did it not work it was recognized for what it was an anti intellectual billyclub to shut down free thought and free speech...find a new shtick.....this is particularly rich considering that Hilary's mentor was Charlie Byrd the only klansman to ever serve in congress a Democrat like all klansmen, and that Obama belonged to a feverently anti-semtic church for over twenty years. a church that gave a lifetime achievement award to Louis Farrakhan...and yet this all seemed to have passed the smell test by all you SJWs.
Tell ya what cupcake...why not get with the times, and stop screamming at the racist to get off your lawn....instead do what the rest of the cool kids are doing...you can go dooor to door and look under people's beds for russian hackers, or get out your crayons and write death threats to Republican members of the elctorial college to change their vote
 
Last edited:

skt239

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Now I'm starting to wonder what trumps real position is on the 2nd amendment...
 

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Now I'm starting to wonder what trumps real position is on the 2nd amendment...
I told you all before, he was NOT friendly to the second amendment.

All his lip flapping during the election was a lie. He is a New York liberal. You'll all see. Trump said publically a long time ago that "we have no use for assault weapons".

Now that doesn't mean I think he will draft legislation himself to ban guns, but I think he would sign any someone else drafts, to restrict it further.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).

You and @freemind are on the same page. Which was my point. Freemind has found himself spouting leftist ideology and I think it's funny. Thanks.


If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...

Of course you would. That's how liberals buy votes with government money. You wouldn't want people that don't think like you to get any. That is exactly what you're saying with this comment. That people that don't think like you get nothing but people that do get paid.

So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite.

A blatant lie that doesn't work anymore. The more the left uses it, the less credible they become. Hence, the Trump win.
 

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.

You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.

You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?

Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.

You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.

You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?

Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.

Trump is A LEBRICAN
One of a KIND!


 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.

You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.

You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?

Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.
Hilary Clinton is a New York liberal...she was a New York liberal senator...not Trump...and if that bitch had won the election and Trump was the only thing standing in her way...well Free the entire press would have been shut down, they'd be sending their stories into the whitehouse for clearance before being printed....the alternative media would have been labeled fake news and it would all have been shut down overnight. and within six months Free your peckerwood ass would have been sent to a FEMA camp in the middle of Nevada ,and be subjected to 8 hour a day lectures given by an obese angry black lesbian proffesor with a degree in african american lesbian sexuality on how to get your mind right along with half the people on this forum for your counter revolutionary mental disorder..for your own good of course....that is what a New York liberal would have done...because you Free are an irredemable deplorable...can you imagine what a president who saw half the population as deplorables beyond redmption would have done to your civil liberties.
I saw a lecture on youtube given by a woman who was 16 years old when Hitler came to power in Austria...she pointed out that Hitler did not invade Austria...there were no tanks in the streets no army flooded Austria.....the Austrian people elected Hitler..they elected him by 96% of the vote...96%....despite birdbrains ravings Trump does not have that kind of mandate...Trump does not have 96% of the electorate behind him..he can not simply give an order and see it done he has to broker for power.this country is like an ocean liner,,,and if you know anything about boats you just don't hit a pedal and the fucking thing stops it has impetus that keeps driving it.....Trumps election alone has saved you from a trip to Nevada cause that is exactlly where this boat under Captian Hilary was headed....I wrote months ago I believed that Trump would most likely be co-opted or betray us., simple because that is what ever other republican has ever done.....but I nor anybody else here voted for a man..we voted for a collection of policies. we sent a message to the globalists to go fuck themselves....Trump is not Hitler he can't just give orders he has to be a power broker and cut us the best deal he can from the vampires who have power.......will he do that....hell I don't know but for fucksakes I'm going to give him a chance and not deligtamize the fucker when he hasn't spent one single day in office yet....I really didn't expect him to appoint Ron Paul SOS. or head of Treasury... well I did but just in my daydreams.
But think about it Trump is not supported by either political establishment..in my lifetime this has never been done before..even Regan though he didn't have enthusiaistic support of the GOP he still had more than Trump did. Trump can't really trust anyone in the political class and it is no wonder he is looking to the bussiness community and the military to fill his cabniet...the politicians all hate him.
 
Last edited:

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Lol. Sent to camps, eh? Didn't people scream that was going to happen with the Bummer too? You are dreaming if you think Clinton could have sent people in mass, to FEMA camps. That trotted out line is older than dinosaur shit. And it simply is FALSE.

Trump IS a liberal. Period. Argue all you want. He just is.

He is so BUSY sucking all the establishment cock in D.C., I wouldn't be surprised to see him with permanent blowers cramp. The dude is busy sucking Obama's ass, Ryan's ass, and ANY other political old crony he can find.

Please stop with the lies and misdirection. Trump is the same political TURD Hilary would have been. You'll see soon enough. He's stacking his cabinet with phonies and his term in office will be a complete farce. You are so intent on "giving him a chance" because he simply wasn't Hilary, that you blind yourself to what he is preparing to do. Stop acting like a putz.

P.S. you saw under the Bummer, that the new way of doing business, is to just write a executive order. Trump has already said he plans to do that too.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Oh sorry my mistake ..I thought your brain was developed enough to grasp the concept of sarcasam...although you are one dimwitted motherfucker if you think Hilary Clinton would not have shut down the free press and would have evicerated peoples civil liberties, and started wars..It's apparent you are not interested in anything other than your butthurt over Trump winning the election. I'm sorry nothing can help you.your anus is irredeemablly reamed....as Time pointed out you sound like ..like..like a new york liberal over Trump winning ....your are not one whit different than the dipshits in the BLM riots.or the hysterical castrati in the MSM having a total meltdown.......Trump nor the people who voted for him ever thought he was a conservative he never said he was.....IF he doesn't stop the flood of Illegals,IF he signs the TPP, IF he tries and takes people's guns,IF he brings in ten's of thousands of muslims from hostile nations,IF he gets us into wars. .. then I'll fight him..I don't care if he's a conservative I care he is a nationalist and not a globalist.We need Liberals and we need Conservatives, but more importantly we need people that believe in the republic not the New fucking World Order. Though I'm sure you are a very gifted prophet I think I'll allow Trump the chance to prove himself rather than rely on your psychic abilities.
 
Last edited:

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Good ol' Steve Bannon, the guy responsible for headlines like these:

"Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy"

"The solution to online harassment is simple: women should just log off"

"Gay rights have made us dumber, it’s time to get back in the closet"

His ex-wife has said he wouldn't allow their child to attend a school in LA because there were Jews there.

He says women who don't like him are "a bunch of dykes."

On his own philosophy: "I’m a Leninist ... Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too."

On the Republican party: "Leadership are all cunts" and "We should just go buck wild." (actually, they kind of are)

He does have a glowing endorsement from David Duke, so there's that.

I could keep digging (the treasure trove of hateful things your #1 go-to as a great appointment choice literally never ends), but the low-hanging fruit seems to suggest he's much more into hating women and Jews than blacks or Muslims (though there's plenty of case to be made on any front).

These are the things that make you like a person. They are also the things that make me dislike a person - I'd prefer to judge someone on their character than their gender, race, or religion. By specifically endorsing someone like Steve Bannon, you're telling me that your character is centered around disrespecting women, encouraging animosity amongst people of different faiths, and fomenting dissent and unhappiness in general among the diverse population of the United States. You think these traits are what makes one a good American, I think that the same are reasons to be embarrassed that people like you call themselves American.

It's no longer the case that I fail to understand where you're coming from. You've made that clear, and thank you for the effort to do so. I simply despise to the core everything you stand for, as I think such hatred, division, and self-serving interests are everything that's wrong with the country. If you believe that my judging people based on their actions rather than their skin color or creed is what's really the problem, you probably feel the same about me. We've reached an impasse here, but at least there's an understanding.

Your side is winning at the moment, I'll grant you that. I wish I could extend congratulations on that front, but I'm the father of a little girl and the world you're hoping to create would form a horrific landscape for her to have to navigate as an adult - I don't want it to be okay for rich men to "grab her by the pussy" or to make her feel that the only way she can feel safe from online bullies is to give in and hide from them, as your heroes seem to suggest is the proper course of action, so I feel compelled instead to speak out as loudly and derisively as I can about everything you apparently hold dear.
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Oh sorry my mistake ..I thought your brain was developed enough to grasp the concept of sarcasam...although you are one dimwitted motherfucker if you think Hilary Clinton would not have shut down the free press and would have evicerated peoples civil liberties, and started wars..It's apparent you are not interested in anything other than your butthurt over Trump winning the election. I'm sorry nothing can help you.your anus is irredeemablly reamed....as Time pointed out you sound like ..like..like a new york liberal over Trump winning ....your are not one whit different than the dipshits in the BLM riots.or the hysterical castrati in the MSM having a total meltdown.......Trump nor the people who voted for him ever thought he was a conservative he never said he was.....IF he doesn't stop the flood of Illegals,IF he signs the TPP, IF he tries and takes people's guns,IF he brings in ten's of thousands of muslims from hostile nations,IF he gets us into wars. .. then I'll fight him..I don't care if he's a conservative I care he is a nationalist and not a globalist.We need Liberals and we need Conservatives, but more importantly we need people that believe in the republic not the New fucking World Order. Though I'm sure you are a very gifted prophet I think I'll allow Trump the chance to prove himself rather than rely on your psychic abilities.
1. Can you point to any, and I literally mean any, evidence that Clinton has been nearly as hostile toward the concept of a free press as Trump? She's been critical of her coverage because plenty of dirt has properly been thrown at her dirty deeds, but for every time she's said something negative about the press reporting facts that don't benefit her I can show you ten examples where Trump's done worse. You know that's true.

2. What is "the hysterical castrati in the MSM?" I'm not joking, I literally don't know what this is and I'm interested.

3. I hope to see you, or at least some people like you, at the anti-TPP protests in the coming weeks/months. I've had no one to interview but hippie granola types, and I'd really like a broader coalition including some conservatives to come out and give more balance to my reporting on this issue. The fact is they just don't seem to exist here in San Diego, even though we're the last conservative stronghold of the state...
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.

You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.

You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?

Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.

Cry cry cry. You whine about Trump like the snowflakes. You whine about rich people like the snowflakes. You make up your own shit to whine about like the snowflakes. You whine about Trumps picks like the snowflakes. Everything the snowflakes whine about on CNN, you whine about here.

Look at who pushes the like button on your posts in the forum. The forum snowflakes.

If it walks and talks like a snowflake, it's a fucking snowflake.

image.jpeg
 

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Oh sorry my mistake ..I thought your brain was developed enough to grasp the concept of sarcasam...although you are one dimwitted motherfucker if you think Hilary Clinton would not have shut down the free press and would have evicerated peoples civil liberties, and started wars..It's apparent you are not interested in anything other than your butthurt over Trump winning the election. I'm sorry nothing can help you.your anus is irredeemablly reamed....as Time pointed out you sound like ..like..like a new york liberal over Trump winning ....your are not one whit different than the dipshits in the BLM riots.or the hysterical castrati in the MSM having a total meltdown.......Trump nor the people who voted for him ever thought he was a conservative he never said he was.....IF he doesn't stop the flood of Illegals,IF he signs the TPP, IF he tries and takes people's guns,IF he brings in ten's of thousands of muslims from hostile nations,IF he gets us into wars. .. then I'll fight him..I don't care if he's a conservative I care he is a nationalist and not a globalist.We need Liberals and we need Conservatives, but more importantly we need people that believe in the republic not the New fucking World Order. Though I'm sure you are a very gifted prophet I think I'll allow Trump the chance to prove himself rather than rely on your psychic abilities.
Nah. You won't fight him at all. You are a pussy who is fully vested in Trump. You are too scared to admit the liar pulled the wool over your eyes, and the eyes of every other voter too.

If you really believed half the shit you've espoused here on the forums, you'd be pretty suspicious and pissed off with him already. If your head wasn't buried up your ass, you'd see Trump isn't going to be a nationalist.

But I'm sure you'll come up with another 500 word, run on sentence to type out, describing your rage with me, frothing at the pie hole some more.

At least you and Trump have something in common. You're both fake. You got an orange spray on tan too?
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Cry cry cry. You whine about Trump like the snowflakes. You whine about rich people like the snowflakes. You make up your own shit to whine about like the snowflakes. You whine about Trumps picks like the snowflakes. Everything the snowflakes whine about on CNN, you whine about here.

Look at who pushes the like button on your posts in the forum. The forum snowflakes.

If it walks and talks like a snowflake, it's a fucking snowflake.

image.jpeg

I'm gonna like ur shit like a ️.


 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Good ol' Steve Bannon, the guy responsible for headlines like these:

"Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy"

"The solution to online harassment is simple: women should just log off"

"Gay rights have made us dumber, it’s time to get back in the closet"

His ex-wife has said he wouldn't allow their child to attend a school in LA because there were Jews there.

He says women who don't like him are "a bunch of dykes."

On his own philosophy: "I’m a Leninist ... Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too."

On the Republican party: "Leadership are all cunts" and "We should just go buck wild." (actually, they kind of are)

He does have a glowing endorsement from David Duke, so there's that.

I could keep digging (the treasure trove of hateful things your #1 go-to as a great appointment choice literally never ends), but the low-hanging fruit seems to suggest he's much more into hating women and Jews than blacks or Muslims (though there's plenty of case to be made on any front).

These are the things that make you like a person. They are also the things that make me dislike a person - I'd prefer to judge someone on their character than their gender, race, or religion. By specifically endorsing someone like Steve Bannon, you're telling me that your character is centered around disrespecting women, encouraging animosity amongst people of different faiths, and fomenting dissent and unhappiness in general among the diverse population of the United States. You think these traits are what makes one a good American, I think that the same are reasons to be embarrassed that people like you call themselves American.

It's no longer the case that I fail to understand where you're coming from. You've made that clear, and thank you for the effort to do so. I simply despise to the core everything you stand for, as I think such hatred, division, and self-serving interests are everything that's wrong with the country. If you believe that my judging people based on their actions rather than their skin color or creed is what's really the problem, you probably feel the same about me. We've reached an impasse here, but at least there's an understanding.

Your side is winning at the moment, I'll grant you that. I wish I could extend congratulations on that front, but I'm the father of a little girl and the world you're hoping to create would form a horrific landscape for her to have to navigate as an adult - I don't want it to be okay for rich men to "grab her by the pussy" or to make her feel that the only way she can feel safe from online bullies is to give in and hide from them, as your heroes seem to suggest is the proper course of action, so I feel compelled instead to speak out as loudly and derisively as I can about everything you apparently hold dear.
20151114_crybully.jpg
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
You and @freemind are on the same page. Which was my point. Freemind has found himself spouting leftist ideology and I think it's funny. Thanks.




Of course you would. That's how liberals buy votes with government money. You wouldn't want people that don't think like you to get any. That is exactly what you're saying with this comment. That people that don't think like you get nothing but people that do get paid.



A blatant lie that doesn't work anymore. The more the left uses it, the less credible they become. Hence, the Trump win.
Despite various times in my life when I've been eligible, I've never taken a penny of government money. Not one cent. Can you say the same? This would include tax subsidies for farming related to raising your horsies.

I think I've provided fairly sufficient proof regarding the character of Bannon. Perhaps the more some people hear the truth, the more sand they try to stuff in their ears to make it all go away. I can't personally be responsible for the irresponsibility of others, nor will I stop saying things that are true yet uncomfortable simply because others with small minds fight reality by pretending it doesn't exist.
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm taking it you admit everything I have to say is true, and that by saying nothing to me in response other than "crybaby" you're gloating about the fact you know your side is lying and yet you're still getting away with it?
 

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Cry cry cry. You whine about Trump like the snowflakes. You whine about rich people like the snowflakes. You make up your own shit to whine about like the snowflakes. You whine about Trumps picks like the snowflakes. Everything the snowflakes whine about on CNN, you whine about here.

Look at who pushes the like button on your posts in the forum. The forum snowflakes.

If it walks and talks like a snowflake, it's a fucking snowflake.

image.jpeg

What? I couldn't see that post. I was taking in your political assessment of the SOS not being tied to crony republicans.

You are about as good as the election pollsters. As soon as you open your mouth giving your useless, and false assessment, the truth comes out and eggs your face.

Yet I am a "liberal Bernie supporter" because Trump is a lying, worthless piece of shit.

Like pulse, you and Trump have something in common. Blowers cramp.......
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
What? I couldn't see that post. I was taking in your political assessment of the SOS not being tied to crony republicans.

You are about as good as the election pollsters. As soon as you open your mouth giving your useless, and false assessment, the truth comes out and eggs your face.

Yet I am a "liberal Bernie supporter" because Trump is a lying, worthless piece of shit.

Like pulse, you and Trump have something in common. Blowers cramp.......

Ooops


 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm taking it you admit everything I have to say is true, and that by saying nothing to me in response other than "crybaby" you're gloating about the fact you know your side is lying and yet you're still getting away with it?

LOL. No, I'm laughing at you twisting shit up to fit your narrative and then crying about it. It didn't deserve a written response.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
What? I couldn't see that post. I was taking in your political assessment of the SOS not being tied to crony republicans.

You are about as good as the election pollsters. As soon as you open your mouth giving your useless, and false assessment, the truth comes out and eggs your face.

Yet I am a "liberal Bernie supporter" because Trump is a lying, worthless piece of shit.

Like pulse, you and Trump have something in common. Blowers cramp.......

You're a liberal Bernie supporter because you talk like a liberal Bernie supporter. You and Dave and Bernie, "The rich is what's wrong with this country."
 

freemind

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Actually, I found Bernie repulsive as a candidate. I found it scary that a open and avowed socialist, could even get enough support to get considered.

But keep playing your tired line. You should make it part of your signature line. It would go great with your blowers cramp.
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
LOL. No, I'm laughing at you twisting shit up to fit your narrative and then crying about it. It didn't deserve a written response.
I'm taking actual quotes and using them as evidence to support the opinion I've formed about an individual, and what his presence in an administration says about said administration. If you search out the articles, for example, that the headlines are lifted from, you'd be aware that the statements are in no way taken out of context.

You're a liberal Bernie supporter because you talk like a liberal Bernie supporter. You and Dave and Bernie, "The rich is what's wrong with this country."
Not all rich people are what's wrong with this country - I should walk my previous overstatement back a bit. There are plenty of rich people who still believe in a fair and just society. You and your illiterate buddy have devoted plenty of text to hating on some of them...
 

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Actually, I found Bernie repulsive as a candidate. I found it scary that a open and avowed socialist, could even get enough support to get considered.

But keep playing your tired line. You should make it part of your signature line. It would go great with your blowers cramp.
Meanwhile, I found Sanders a rather intriguing candidate - I thought he was a bit over the top, and more than a bit of a blowhard, but not someone to be dismissed out of hand.

freemind, I'm sure I disagree with you on a lot - but I appreciate the fact that we can converse in a coherent fashion and agree we have both points of commonality and dissention. Healthy discourse makes the nation stronger.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm taking actual quotes and using them as evidence to support the opinion I've formed about an individual, and what his presence in an administration says about said administration. If you search out the articles, for example, that the headlines are lifted from, you'd be aware that the statements are in no way taken out of context.


Not all rich people are what's wrong with this country - I should walk my previous overstatement back a bit. There are plenty of rich people who still believe in a fair and just society. You and your illiterate buddy have devoted plenty of text to hating on some of them...

The problem with your "evidence" is that all three stories were written by a overtly gay jew that prefers black dick. Milo Yiannopoulos.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/08/birth-control-makes-women-unattractive-and-crazy/

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/05/solution-online-harassment-simple-women-log-off/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...us-dumber-its-time-to-get-back-in-the-closet/

And Milo is not the only Jew writer on Breitbart. Not to mention that Breitbart himself was a jew. And yes, you did take them out of context. Milo writes that he is speaking as a gay.

"I am a gay exceptionalist, because that is what science and history tell me to be. That’s why I find it depressing that my fellow [gays] have stopped breeding. James I, generally regarded as a good king, had gay relationships. It’s said that one of his lovers was Francis Bacon, the father of British empiricism. Bacon married twice but had no children. What might his descendants have accomplished, had old Francis bitten the bullet and shagged his missus a bit more often?"

That's the problem you libs have, you cherry pick your so called "facts" and twist them into something entirely different. Yeah right, Milo the overtly gay jew, hates jews and gays and women. And then since the stories were on Breitbart, who was a jew, that makes the CEO Bannon anti gay, anti jew and anti women.:rolleyes:

@freemind seems to be the only one that has a problem with gays. He adds a "blowing" line to nearly all his posts to me, like that is supposed to be some kind of insult. I guess he's got the problem with the gays.

 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Good ol' Steve Bannon, the guy responsible for headlines like these:

"Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy"

"The solution to online harassment is simple: women should just log off"

"Gay rights have made us dumber, it’s time to get back in the closet"

His ex-wife has said he wouldn't allow their child to attend a school in LA because there were Jews there.

He says women who don't like him are "a bunch of dykes."

On his own philosophy: "I’m a Leninist ... Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too."

On the Republican party: "Leadership are all cunts" and "We should just go buck wild." (actually, they kind of are)

He does have a glowing endorsement from David Duke, so there's that.

I could keep digging (the treasure trove of hateful things your #1 go-to as a great appointment choice literally never ends), but the low-hanging fruit seems to suggest he's much more into hating women and Jews than blacks or Muslims (though there's plenty of case to be made on any front).

These are the things that make you like a person. They are also the things that make me dislike a person - I'd prefer to judge someone on their character than their gender, race, or religion. By specifically endorsing someone like Steve Bannon, you're telling me that your character is centered around disrespecting women, encouraging animosity amongst people of different faiths, and fomenting dissent and unhappiness in general among the diverse population of the United States. You think these traits are what makes one a good American, I think that the same are reasons to be embarrassed that people like you call themselves American.

It's no longer the case that I fail to understand where you're coming from. You've made that clear, and thank you for the effort to do so. I simply despise to the core everything you stand for, as I think such hatred, division, and self-serving interests are everything that's wrong with the country. If you believe that my judging people based on their actions rather than their skin color or creed is what's really the problem, you probably feel the same about me. We've reached an impasse here, but at least there's an understanding.

Your side is winning at the moment, I'll grant you that. I wish I could extend congratulations on that front, but I'm the father of a little girl and the world you're hoping to create would form a horrific landscape for her to have to navigate as an adult - I don't want it to be okay for rich men to "grab her by the pussy" or to make her feel that the only way she can feel safe from online bullies is to give in and hide from them, as your heroes seem to suggest is the proper course of action, so I feel compelled instead to speak out as loudly and derisively as I can about everything you apparently hold dear.
God you're a stupid cunt...and fucking lazy to boot...You just quoted a Hilary speech damn near word for word...why don't you get off your lazy ass and at least try and reword your plagerisim so it isn't so tansparent..what rock you been under..all these allegations directed toward Bannon have been blown out of the water. you are floundering the paradigm you've embraced is going down in flames and like all liberals now you are trying to blame other people for the total rejection of your ideas, by malignng them with your zombie like roll call of "ists" and "phobes" that have becomes to trite and threadbare they have become a national joke..and lost you all the election...I doubt you are even human...you mouth every propoganda talking point of the Hilary campaign word for word then you drag your little girl into this post Obama apocolypse scenario like that dumb fucking journalist who wrote a column on what to tell his daughter about Trump winning.....are you sure you even have a life...Your daughter doesn't have to worry about Trump molesting her...she has to worry about being raised by a dishonorble and dishonest hysterical castrati who has a meltdown when people have differing political views and attempts to shut down free speech and thought by throwing out the word "RACIST" every time the world slaps his stupid face in the mouth with reality.
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
1. Can you point to any, and I literally mean any, evidence that Clinton has been nearly as hostile toward the concept of a free press as Trump? She's been critical of her coverage because plenty of dirt has properly been thrown at her dirty deeds, but for every time she's said something negative about the press reporting facts that don't benefit her I can show you ten examples where Trump's done worse. You know that's true.

2. What is "the hysterical castrati in the MSM?" I'm not joking, I literally don't know what this is and I'm interested.

3. I hope to see you, or at least some people like you, at the anti-TPP protests in the coming weeks/months. I've had no one to interview but hippie granola types, and I'd really like a broader coalition including some conservatives to come out and give more balance to my reporting on this issue. The fact is they just don't seem to exist here in San Diego, even though we're the last conservative stronghold of the state...

while you were sleeping or burning one with Gary and pouring over an atlas of the world.....you may have missed all those annoying little details that wikileaks released about the collusion with the media ( I believe at last count it was like 65 journalists) and the Clinton campaign,,,the NYT, CNN ect. now if conspiring with the leading corporate media outlets in the country to manipulate an election is not interfering with a free press just what the fuck is..
The attack on Brietbart and other alternative news outlets repeatedly made by Hilary the attempt by Obama and the DNC to shut down free press under the guise of "fake news"...you are no Libertarian..you are to well versed in the platitudes of the Hilary campaign either that or you get your information from the globalist media headlines.and you are to willing to lie for the corporate media.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Despite various times in my life when I've been eligible, I've never taken a penny of government money. Not one cent. Can you say the same? This would include tax subsidies for farming related to raising your horsies.

I think I've provided fairly sufficient proof regarding the character of Bannon. Perhaps the more some people hear the truth, the more sand they try to stuff in their ears to make it all go away. I can't personally be responsible for the irresponsibility of others, nor will I stop saying things that are true yet uncomfortable simply because others with small minds fight reality by pretending it doesn't exist.
you didn't build that.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
God you're a stupid cunt...and fucking lazy to boot...You just quoted a Hilary speech damn near word for word...why don't you get off your lazy ass and at least try and reword your plagerisim so it isn't so tansparent..what rock you been under..all these allegations directed toward Bannon have been blown out of the water. you are floundering the paradigm you've embraced is going down in flames and like all liberals now you are trying to blame other people for the total rejection of your ideas, by malignng them with your zombie like roll call of "ists" and "phobes" that have becomes to trite and threadbare they have become a national joke..and lost you all the election...I doubt you are even human...you mouth every propoganda talking point of the Hilary campaign word for word then you drag your little girl into this post Obama apocolypse scenario like that dumb fucking journalist who wrote a column on what to tell his daughter about Trump winning.....are you sure you even have a life...Your daughter doesn't have to worry about Trump molesting her...she has to worry about being raised by a dishonarble and dishonest hysterical castrati who has a meltdown when people have differing political views and attempts to shut down free speech and thought by throwing out the word "RACIST" every time the world slaps his stupid face in the mouth with reality.

He forgot to add the MSM's most popular "evidence" that Breitbart is anti-jew. "Bill Kristol: Republican spoiler - Renegade Jew"

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...bill-kristol-republican-spoiler-renegade-jew/

Milo didn't write that one, another jew did. David Horowitz.

Nor does he mention another Breitbart headline, "The Establishment Conservatives Guide to the Alt Right"

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/

Written by, "a gay man of Jewish descent and a mixed-ethnic half-Pakistani". Milo and Allum Bokhari.

He then claims he did not take the headlines out of context, which is a lie. Authors and their style in the points they are making are context. I certainly don't take lines from Lisa Lamponelli and say that they are proof that all liberals are racist or even that Lisa herself is a racist. Her jokes are racist but the context is both her and her style of comedy and the context is the fucking joke. Certainly, Lisa's racist jokes don't make the Comedy Channel CEO a racist. Liberals are the masters of taking shit out of context. Repeating a headline that appears anti gay or anti jew but not bothering to mention that the author/s are gay and/or jew is taking it out of context and is the definition of intellectual dishonesty.

But, this is nothing new. I did a search awhile back for many of the past conservative candidates for Pres. Example, "Romney is a racist". There were stories about everyone I plugged into google depicting them as racist, most of which was extremely tenuous. It doesn't matter what is said, how politically correct, they use words like "dog whistle" to twist it to suit their agenda. People got tired of it. We don't worry about what we say being twisted anymore because no matter how it's said, liberals will twist it. That's what they do.
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He forgot to add the MSM's most popular "evidence" that Breitbart is anti-jew. "Bill Kristol: Republican spoiler - Renegade Jew"

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...bill-kristol-republican-spoiler-renegade-jew/

Milo didn't write that one, another jew did. David Horowitz.

Nor does he mention another Breitbart headline, "The Establishment Conservatives Guide to the Alt Right"

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/

Written by, "a gay man of Jewish descent and a mixed-ethnic half-Pakistani". Milo and Allum Bokhari.

He then claims he did not take the headlines out of context, which is a lie. Authors and their style in the points they are making are context. I certainly don't take lines from Lisa Lamponelli and say that they are proof that all liberals are racist or even that Lisa herself is a racist. Her jokes are racist but the context is both her and her style of comedy and the context is the fucking joke. Certainly, Lisa's racist jokes don't make the Comedy Channel CEO a racist. Liberals are the masters of taking shit out of context. Repeating a headline that appears anti gay or anti jew but not bothering to mention that the author/s are gay and/or jew is taking it out of context and is the definition of intellectual dishonesty.

But, this is nothing new. I did a search awhile back for many of the past conservative candidates for Pres. Example, "Romney is a racist". There were stories about everyone I plugged into google depicting them as racist, most of which was extremely tenuous. It doesn't matter what is said, how politically correct, they use words like "dog whistle" to twist it to suit their agenda. People got tired of it. We don't worry about what we say being twisted anymore because no matter how it's said, liberals will twist it. That's what they do.


Yeah even the ADL had to come clean and apologize to Bannon .But dipshits like Dave will grasp at any straw any lie to save the DNC.

“The Anti-Defamation League has engaged in the most partisan libelous smear campaign imaginable against Stephen Bannon based on their own political prejudices and bias. One would expect ADL to actually look at the record prior to defaming someone who has proven to not only not be an anti-Semite, but to be a true friend of Israel. After four days of obscene character assassination of Bannon and Breitbart News, ADL has been forced to admit that there is no evidence that Bannon has ever made any anti-Semitic comments. This should provide a cautionary tale for the media that all too often engages in ready, fire, aim narratives unsupported by facts when talking about people they disagree with.

“Everyone in the media who reported this without first checking and ADL in particular owe Stephen Bannon and Breitbart News a front-page apology for their reckless political smear job.



- See more at: http://getliberty.org/2016/11/adl-b...atements-made-by-bannon/#sthash.OsBi08nU.dpuf
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Yeah even the ADL had to come clean and apologize to Bannon .But dipshits like Dave will grasp at any straw any lie to save the DNC.

“The Anti-Defamation League has engaged in the most partisan libelous smear campaign imaginable against Stephen Bannon based on their own political prejudices and bias. One would expect ADL to actually look at the record prior to defaming someone who has proven to not only not be an anti-Semite, but to be a true friend of Israel. After four days of obscene character assassination of Bannon and Breitbart News, ADL has been forced to admit that there is no evidence that Bannon has ever made any anti-Semitic comments. This should provide a cautionary tale for the media that all too often engages in ready, fire, aim narratives unsupported by facts when talking about people they disagree with.

“Everyone in the media who reported this without first checking and ADL in particular owe Stephen Bannon and Breitbart News a front-page apology for their reckless political smear job.



- See more at: http://getliberty.org/2016/11/adl-b...atements-made-by-bannon/#sthash.OsBi08nU.dpuf

B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but, David Duke! Dave said, "David Duke"! That proves it. Because, you know, if a racist supports you, you are a racist. Just like if a child molester supports you, you are a child molester. If a rapist supports you, you are a rapist. That's just science.

There are no stories on Breitbart written by David Duke. But just saying the name "David Duke" in your post about Bannon makes David Duke part of Breitbart. That's just science. Everybody knows that.

I'm afraid that Dave has us. David Duke endorses Bannon. That means we can't like Bannon cuz we'll be racists if we do. Hell, a couple years ago a guy on a forum said David Duke uses toilet paper to wipe his ass and since I don't want to be a racist, I've never used toilet paper again. I won't even let it in the house. Better to have an itchy, rashed and stinky ass than be a racist by association.

laugh.jpg
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but, David Duke! Dave said, "David Duke"! That proves it. Because, you know, if a racist supports you, you are a racist. Just like if a child molester supports you, you are a child molester. If a rapist supports you, you are a rapist. That's just science.

There are no stories on Breitbart written by David Duke. But just saying the name "David Duke" in your post about Bannon makes David Duke part of Breitbart. That's just science. Everybody knows that.

laugh.jpg
Yep, using that logic..Obama is supported by known pedophiles. like Terry Bean....so I guess........Well I'll just let Dave make the connection.

terry-bean-kiah-lawson.jpg





red-plus-clip-art-at-clker-com-vector-clip-art-online-royalty-free-328hI9-clipart.png



capture.jpg
 
Last edited:

OBDave

VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
No. I'm a disabled veteran. You got a problem with that?
Well then I'm proud to say that my tax dollars go to giving you free money from the government. Literally, I am. It makes me sad that you think you deserve free stuff from the government and no one else does, but if you need my money more than I do I'm glad there are makers like me out there to take care of the takers like you.
 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Well then I'm proud to say that my tax dollars go to giving you free money from the government. Literally, I am. It makes me sad that you think you deserve free stuff from the government and no one else does, but if you need my money more than I do I'm glad there are makers like me out there to take care of the takers like you.

I told him that long time ago... but, but there's a way to avoid paying income tax... ummm let me see!! If you ain't got none!! Or you cheat and lie!!
Good morning hardworking Dave?!


 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top