f1r3b1rd
https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
Just wait for the orange one to take over.LOL!
Just wait for the orange one to take over.LOL!
Orange is the new blackJust wait for the orange one to take over.
Lmao!!! The new national drink is OrangeJulius?Orange is the new black
Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).Sing it Bernie! Those god damn rich people are fucking up your country, ain't they? Mother fuckin rich ass bitchez.
Jealous much?
If one were to go back far enough in time, one would remember the Democrats were once the conservative, racist, nationalist party. In order to obscure the fact that the roles between the Republicans and Democrats flipped more than 100 years ago, many people bent on obfuscation will bring up the entirely out-of-context point that nearly two centuries ago it was a Republican president that used the guise of ending slavery as a rallying cry to end the Civil War, completely ignoring the role of the Republican party over the course of their own lifetimes. Is that where you're taking this?
In my early twenties, I paid more in taxes each year that I've made annually over the last few years. I didn't bitch then, and I don't bitch now - except for the Obamacare tax that says I should be penalized by having to pay extra taxes because I can't afford to purchase insurance from a private company that I may or may not want to buy anyway. All the wingnuts on the right get caught up in calling Obama a socialist, but the fact his key legislative legacy forces private citizens to buy a product they may not want from a corporate entity makes him more of a fascist in my mind than anything else. If I continue working as hard as I have, I have some faith that at some point in the future I'll once again be paying more in taxes than the average government employee clears in a year. And if I'm so fortunate I'll be thankful that I'm in a place to do so rather than bitter about it. If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...I know about all that Bird. Time isn't one of those people though. There are two kinds of horse "farms". The ones (very few) who have horses like Rolls Royce's. It's BIG money.
Then there are those who are not (most). They think they are in tall cotton when they sell a colt for a couple thousand. They spend all their time being "horse" people. Life revolves around horses and making a meager buck.
Were Time really one of those that made big money in horses, he wouldn't be here. He would be way more occupied with making money with his horses. Add to that, how many times he's said he avoids taxes at all costs. That's not a sign of anyone successful in business. That's someone who makes a meager income and thinks they are sticking it to "the man", when if they spent as much energy being successful instead of avoiding taxes, they would likely BE wealthy.
So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite. You seem disappointed he didn't nominate more people from the same vein. We can agree to disagree on this one - you've (finally) made your voice clear. I understand what you're saying. I wholeheartedly disagree with you, but at least you've coherently conveyed your views.Exactlly the only appointments he's made I really like are Bannon and Jeff Sessions.... and mad dog...that being said the images of what Hilary would have nominated would have been reminiscent of the Red Guard...or Cruz ...god only knows a tent revival meeting?...Rubio what ever the Bush family told him to do.....I'm pissed about some of it, but I still believe we missed a really big bullet this election.....Hilary would have been disasterous.....but it changes nothing it is still up to us to be active and vocal about our goverment..
What a pathetic little twat...Jeff Sessions is endorsed by more black people than you've ever seen in your entire life...he prosecuted and demanded a life senentnce against the head of the kkk in his home state...It's twats like you who got Trump elected...people so void of intellect or integrity that anyone that dissented against your world view wasn't met by rationale argumnets but was just smeared with cries of..racist..homophobe...mysoginist....Islamphobe...if you bothered to pull your head out of the sand, you may have realized that leftist smearing didn't work this election..not only did it not work it was recognized for what it was an anti intellectual billyclub to shut down free thought and free speech...find a new shtick.....this is particularly rich considering that Hilary's mentor was Charlie Byrd the only klansman to ever serve in congress a Democrat like all klansmen, and that Obama belonged to a feverently anti-semtic church for over twenty years. a church that gave a lifetime achievement award to Louis Farrakhan...and yet this all seemed to have passed the smell test by all you SJWs.Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).
No, I'm not jealous. I've been there, and I'm not proud of it. I'll get back someday, or maybe not. But I'll be able to sleep at night, regardless.
If one were to go back far enough in time, one would remember the Democrats were once the conservative, racist, nationalist party. In order to obscure the fact that the roles between the Republicans and Democrats flipped more than 100 years ago, many people bent on obfuscation will bring up the entirely out-of-context point that nearly two centuries ago it was a Republican president that used the guise of ending slavery as a rallying cry to end the Civil War, completely ignoring the role of the Republican party over the course of their own lifetimes. Is that where you're taking this?
In my early twenties, I paid more in taxes each year that I've made annually over the last few years. I didn't bitch then, and I don't bitch now - except for the Obamacare tax that says I should be penalized by having to pay extra taxes because I can't afford to purchase insurance from a private company that I may or may not want to buy anyway. All the wingnuts on the right get caught up in calling Obama a socialist, but the fact his key legislative legacy forces private citizens to buy a product they may not want from a corporate entity makes him more of a fascist in my mind than anything else. If I continue working as hard as I have, I have some faith that at some point in the future I'll once again be paying more in taxes than the average government employee clears in a year. And if I'm so fortunate I'll be thankful that I'm in a place to do so rather than bitter about it. If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...
So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite. You seem disappointed he didn't nominate more people from the same vein. We can agree to disagree on this one - you've (finally) made your voice clear. I understand what you're saying. I wholeheartedly disagree with you, but at least you've coherently conveyed your views.
I told you all before, he was NOT friendly to the second amendment.Now I'm starting to wonder what trumps real position is on the 2nd amendment...
Yes, it's primarily the rich people fucking up the country. For evidence of same, I'd point to the ever-widening wealth gap (despite Obama's recent claims to the contrary in is self-congratulatory speech yesterday).
If I had the option, though, I'd implement a policy that says that anyone who publicly bitches about people who take government benefits is no longer eligible to receive them personally...
So your favorite pick is a self-avowed racist and anti-Semite.
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.
You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.
You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?
Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.
Hilary Clinton is a New York liberal...she was a New York liberal senator...not Trump...and if that bitch had won the election and Trump was the only thing standing in her way...well Free the entire press would have been shut down, they'd be sending their stories into the whitehouse for clearance before being printed....the alternative media would have been labeled fake news and it would all have been shut down overnight. and within six months Free your peckerwood ass would have been sent to a FEMA camp in the middle of Nevada ,and be subjected to 8 hour a day lectures given by an obese angry black lesbian proffesor with a degree in african american lesbian sexuality on how to get your mind right along with half the people on this forum for your counter revolutionary mental disorder..for your own good of course....that is what a New York liberal would have done...because you Free are an irredemable deplorable...can you imagine what a president who saw half the population as deplorables beyond redmption would have done to your civil liberties.I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.
You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.
You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?
Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.
1. Can you point to any, and I literally mean any, evidence that Clinton has been nearly as hostile toward the concept of a free press as Trump? She's been critical of her coverage because plenty of dirt has properly been thrown at her dirty deeds, but for every time she's said something negative about the press reporting facts that don't benefit her I can show you ten examples where Trump's done worse. You know that's true.Oh sorry my mistake ..I thought your brain was developed enough to grasp the concept of sarcasam...although you are one dimwitted motherfucker if you think Hilary Clinton would not have shut down the free press and would have evicerated peoples civil liberties, and started wars..It's apparent you are not interested in anything other than your butthurt over Trump winning the election. I'm sorry nothing can help you.your anus is irredeemablly reamed....as Time pointed out you sound like ..like..like a new york liberal over Trump winning ....your are not one whit different than the dipshits in the BLM riots.or the hysterical castrati in the MSM having a total meltdown.......Trump nor the people who voted for him ever thought he was a conservative he never said he was.....IF he doesn't stop the flood of Illegals,IF he signs the TPP, IF he tries and takes people's guns,IF he brings in ten's of thousands of muslims from hostile nations,IF he gets us into wars. .. then I'll fight him..I don't care if he's a conservative I care he is a nationalist and not a globalist.We need Liberals and we need Conservatives, but more importantly we need people that believe in the republic not the New fucking World Order. Though I'm sure you are a very gifted prophet I think I'll allow Trump the chance to prove himself rather than rely on your psychic abilities.
I think it's Time to go back to the stables and milk the stallions. You do better there than you do talking politics.
You think everyone who points out your foolishness is a liberal, spouting leftist propaganda.
You unapologetically, support the New York liberal. You see no fault in what he does. Even when you explain why you liked his SOS pick, you ended up with egg on your face. Odd how he wasn't a establishment republican, yet he is being pimped by them. Guess he WAS part of their gang, after all, eh?
Maybe next you should explain how Trump is gun friendly, so he can come out a few days later raging about guns and how we need to ban them.
Nah. You won't fight him at all. You are a pussy who is fully vested in Trump. You are too scared to admit the liar pulled the wool over your eyes, and the eyes of every other voter too.Oh sorry my mistake ..I thought your brain was developed enough to grasp the concept of sarcasam...although you are one dimwitted motherfucker if you think Hilary Clinton would not have shut down the free press and would have evicerated peoples civil liberties, and started wars..It's apparent you are not interested in anything other than your butthurt over Trump winning the election. I'm sorry nothing can help you.your anus is irredeemablly reamed....as Time pointed out you sound like ..like..like a new york liberal over Trump winning ....your are not one whit different than the dipshits in the BLM riots.or the hysterical castrati in the MSM having a total meltdown.......Trump nor the people who voted for him ever thought he was a conservative he never said he was.....IF he doesn't stop the flood of Illegals,IF he signs the TPP, IF he tries and takes people's guns,IF he brings in ten's of thousands of muslims from hostile nations,IF he gets us into wars. .. then I'll fight him..I don't care if he's a conservative I care he is a nationalist and not a globalist.We need Liberals and we need Conservatives, but more importantly we need people that believe in the republic not the New fucking World Order. Though I'm sure you are a very gifted prophet I think I'll allow Trump the chance to prove himself rather than rely on your psychic abilities.
Cry cry cry. You whine about Trump like the snowflakes. You whine about rich people like the snowflakes. You make up your own shit to whine about like the snowflakes. You whine about Trumps picks like the snowflakes. Everything the snowflakes whine about on CNN, you whine about here.
Look at who pushes the like button on your posts in the forum. The forum snowflakes.
If it walks and talks like a snowflake, it's a fucking snowflake.
Good ol' Steve Bannon, the guy responsible for headlines like these:
"Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy"
"The solution to online harassment is simple: women should just log off"
"Gay rights have made us dumber, it’s time to get back in the closet"
His ex-wife has said he wouldn't allow their child to attend a school in LA because there were Jews there.
He says women who don't like him are "a bunch of dykes."
On his own philosophy: "I’m a Leninist ... Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too."
On the Republican party: "Leadership are all cunts" and "We should just go buck wild." (actually, they kind of are)
He does have a glowing endorsement from David Duke, so there's that.
I could keep digging (the treasure trove of hateful things your #1 go-to as a great appointment choice literally never ends), but the low-hanging fruit seems to suggest he's much more into hating women and Jews than blacks or Muslims (though there's plenty of case to be made on any front).
These are the things that make you like a person. They are also the things that make me dislike a person - I'd prefer to judge someone on their character than their gender, race, or religion. By specifically endorsing someone like Steve Bannon, you're telling me that your character is centered around disrespecting women, encouraging animosity amongst people of different faiths, and fomenting dissent and unhappiness in general among the diverse population of the United States. You think these traits are what makes one a good American, I think that the same are reasons to be embarrassed that people like you call themselves American.
It's no longer the case that I fail to understand where you're coming from. You've made that clear, and thank you for the effort to do so. I simply despise to the core everything you stand for, as I think such hatred, division, and self-serving interests are everything that's wrong with the country. If you believe that my judging people based on their actions rather than their skin color or creed is what's really the problem, you probably feel the same about me. We've reached an impasse here, but at least there's an understanding.
Your side is winning at the moment, I'll grant you that. I wish I could extend congratulations on that front, but I'm the father of a little girl and the world you're hoping to create would form a horrific landscape for her to have to navigate as an adult - I don't want it to be okay for rich men to "grab her by the pussy" or to make her feel that the only way she can feel safe from online bullies is to give in and hide from them, as your heroes seem to suggest is the proper course of action, so I feel compelled instead to speak out as loudly and derisively as I can about everything you apparently hold dear.
Despite various times in my life when I've been eligible, I've never taken a penny of government money. Not one cent. Can you say the same? This would include tax subsidies for farming related to raising your horsies.You and @freemind are on the same page. Which was my point. Freemind has found himself spouting leftist ideology and I think it's funny. Thanks.
Of course you would. That's how liberals buy votes with government money. You wouldn't want people that don't think like you to get any. That is exactly what you're saying with this comment. That people that don't think like you get nothing but people that do get paid.
A blatant lie that doesn't work anymore. The more the left uses it, the less credible they become. Hence, the Trump win.
I'm taking it you admit everything I have to say is true, and that by saying nothing to me in response other than "crybaby" you're gloating about the fact you know your side is lying and yet you're still getting away with it?
Cry cry cry. You whine about Trump like the snowflakes. You whine about rich people like the snowflakes. You make up your own shit to whine about like the snowflakes. You whine about Trumps picks like the snowflakes. Everything the snowflakes whine about on CNN, you whine about here.
Look at who pushes the like button on your posts in the forum. The forum snowflakes.
If it walks and talks like a snowflake, it's a fucking snowflake.
What? I couldn't see that post. I was taking in your political assessment of the SOS not being tied to crony republicans.
You are about as good as the election pollsters. As soon as you open your mouth giving your useless, and false assessment, the truth comes out and eggs your face.
Yet I am a "liberal Bernie supporter" because Trump is a lying, worthless piece of shit.
Like pulse, you and Trump have something in common. Blowers cramp.......
I'm taking it you admit everything I have to say is true, and that by saying nothing to me in response other than "crybaby" you're gloating about the fact you know your side is lying and yet you're still getting away with it?
What? I couldn't see that post. I was taking in your political assessment of the SOS not being tied to crony republicans.
You are about as good as the election pollsters. As soon as you open your mouth giving your useless, and false assessment, the truth comes out and eggs your face.
Yet I am a "liberal Bernie supporter" because Trump is a lying, worthless piece of shit.
Like pulse, you and Trump have something in common. Blowers cramp.......
I'm taking actual quotes and using them as evidence to support the opinion I've formed about an individual, and what his presence in an administration says about said administration. If you search out the articles, for example, that the headlines are lifted from, you'd be aware that the statements are in no way taken out of context.LOL. No, I'm laughing at you twisting shit up to fit your narrative and then crying about it. It didn't deserve a written response.
Not all rich people are what's wrong with this country - I should walk my previous overstatement back a bit. There are plenty of rich people who still believe in a fair and just society. You and your illiterate buddy have devoted plenty of text to hating on some of them...You're a liberal Bernie supporter because you talk like a liberal Bernie supporter. You and Dave and Bernie, "The rich is what's wrong with this country."
Meanwhile, I found Sanders a rather intriguing candidate - I thought he was a bit over the top, and more than a bit of a blowhard, but not someone to be dismissed out of hand.Actually, I found Bernie repulsive as a candidate. I found it scary that a open and avowed socialist, could even get enough support to get considered.
But keep playing your tired line. You should make it part of your signature line. It would go great with your blowers cramp.
I'm taking actual quotes and using them as evidence to support the opinion I've formed about an individual, and what his presence in an administration says about said administration. If you search out the articles, for example, that the headlines are lifted from, you'd be aware that the statements are in no way taken out of context.
Not all rich people are what's wrong with this country - I should walk my previous overstatement back a bit. There are plenty of rich people who still believe in a fair and just society. You and your illiterate buddy have devoted plenty of text to hating on some of them...
Despite various times in my life when I've been eligible, I've never taken a penny of government money. Not one cent. Can you say the same? This would include tax subsidies for farming related to raising your horsies.
God you're a stupid cunt...and fucking lazy to boot...You just quoted a Hilary speech damn near word for word...why don't you get off your lazy ass and at least try and reword your plagerisim so it isn't so tansparent..what rock you been under..all these allegations directed toward Bannon have been blown out of the water. you are floundering the paradigm you've embraced is going down in flames and like all liberals now you are trying to blame other people for the total rejection of your ideas, by malignng them with your zombie like roll call of "ists" and "phobes" that have becomes to trite and threadbare they have become a national joke..and lost you all the election...I doubt you are even human...you mouth every propoganda talking point of the Hilary campaign word for word then you drag your little girl into this post Obama apocolypse scenario like that dumb fucking journalist who wrote a column on what to tell his daughter about Trump winning.....are you sure you even have a life...Your daughter doesn't have to worry about Trump molesting her...she has to worry about being raised by a dishonorble and dishonest hysterical castrati who has a meltdown when people have differing political views and attempts to shut down free speech and thought by throwing out the word "RACIST" every time the world slaps his stupid face in the mouth with reality.Good ol' Steve Bannon, the guy responsible for headlines like these:
"Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy"
"The solution to online harassment is simple: women should just log off"
"Gay rights have made us dumber, it’s time to get back in the closet"
His ex-wife has said he wouldn't allow their child to attend a school in LA because there were Jews there.
He says women who don't like him are "a bunch of dykes."
On his own philosophy: "I’m a Leninist ... Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too."
On the Republican party: "Leadership are all cunts" and "We should just go buck wild." (actually, they kind of are)
He does have a glowing endorsement from David Duke, so there's that.
I could keep digging (the treasure trove of hateful things your #1 go-to as a great appointment choice literally never ends), but the low-hanging fruit seems to suggest he's much more into hating women and Jews than blacks or Muslims (though there's plenty of case to be made on any front).
These are the things that make you like a person. They are also the things that make me dislike a person - I'd prefer to judge someone on their character than their gender, race, or religion. By specifically endorsing someone like Steve Bannon, you're telling me that your character is centered around disrespecting women, encouraging animosity amongst people of different faiths, and fomenting dissent and unhappiness in general among the diverse population of the United States. You think these traits are what makes one a good American, I think that the same are reasons to be embarrassed that people like you call themselves American.
It's no longer the case that I fail to understand where you're coming from. You've made that clear, and thank you for the effort to do so. I simply despise to the core everything you stand for, as I think such hatred, division, and self-serving interests are everything that's wrong with the country. If you believe that my judging people based on their actions rather than their skin color or creed is what's really the problem, you probably feel the same about me. We've reached an impasse here, but at least there's an understanding.
Your side is winning at the moment, I'll grant you that. I wish I could extend congratulations on that front, but I'm the father of a little girl and the world you're hoping to create would form a horrific landscape for her to have to navigate as an adult - I don't want it to be okay for rich men to "grab her by the pussy" or to make her feel that the only way she can feel safe from online bullies is to give in and hide from them, as your heroes seem to suggest is the proper course of action, so I feel compelled instead to speak out as loudly and derisively as I can about everything you apparently hold dear.
1. Can you point to any, and I literally mean any, evidence that Clinton has been nearly as hostile toward the concept of a free press as Trump? She's been critical of her coverage because plenty of dirt has properly been thrown at her dirty deeds, but for every time she's said something negative about the press reporting facts that don't benefit her I can show you ten examples where Trump's done worse. You know that's true.
2. What is "the hysterical castrati in the MSM?" I'm not joking, I literally don't know what this is and I'm interested.
3. I hope to see you, or at least some people like you, at the anti-TPP protests in the coming weeks/months. I've had no one to interview but hippie granola types, and I'd really like a broader coalition including some conservatives to come out and give more balance to my reporting on this issue. The fact is they just don't seem to exist here in San Diego, even though we're the last conservative stronghold of the state...
you didn't build that.Despite various times in my life when I've been eligible, I've never taken a penny of government money. Not one cent. Can you say the same? This would include tax subsidies for farming related to raising your horsies.
I think I've provided fairly sufficient proof regarding the character of Bannon. Perhaps the more some people hear the truth, the more sand they try to stuff in their ears to make it all go away. I can't personally be responsible for the irresponsibility of others, nor will I stop saying things that are true yet uncomfortable simply because others with small minds fight reality by pretending it doesn't exist.
God you're a stupid cunt...and fucking lazy to boot...You just quoted a Hilary speech damn near word for word...why don't you get off your lazy ass and at least try and reword your plagerisim so it isn't so tansparent..what rock you been under..all these allegations directed toward Bannon have been blown out of the water. you are floundering the paradigm you've embraced is going down in flames and like all liberals now you are trying to blame other people for the total rejection of your ideas, by malignng them with your zombie like roll call of "ists" and "phobes" that have becomes to trite and threadbare they have become a national joke..and lost you all the election...I doubt you are even human...you mouth every propoganda talking point of the Hilary campaign word for word then you drag your little girl into this post Obama apocolypse scenario like that dumb fucking journalist who wrote a column on what to tell his daughter about Trump winning.....are you sure you even have a life...Your daughter doesn't have to worry about Trump molesting her...she has to worry about being raised by a dishonarble and dishonest hysterical castrati who has a meltdown when people have differing political views and attempts to shut down free speech and thought by throwing out the word "RACIST" every time the world slaps his stupid face in the mouth with reality.
He forgot to add the MSM's most popular "evidence" that Breitbart is anti-jew. "Bill Kristol: Republican spoiler - Renegade Jew"
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...bill-kristol-republican-spoiler-renegade-jew/
Milo didn't write that one, another jew did. David Horowitz.
Nor does he mention another Breitbart headline, "The Establishment Conservatives Guide to the Alt Right"
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/
Written by, "a gay man of Jewish descent and a mixed-ethnic half-Pakistani". Milo and Allum Bokhari.
He then claims he did not take the headlines out of context, which is a lie. Authors and their style in the points they are making are context. I certainly don't take lines from Lisa Lamponelli and say that they are proof that all liberals are racist or even that Lisa herself is a racist. Her jokes are racist but the context is both her and her style of comedy and the context is the fucking joke. Certainly, Lisa's racist jokes don't make the Comedy Channel CEO a racist. Liberals are the masters of taking shit out of context. Repeating a headline that appears anti gay or anti jew but not bothering to mention that the author/s are gay and/or jew is taking it out of context and is the definition of intellectual dishonesty.
But, this is nothing new. I did a search awhile back for many of the past conservative candidates for Pres. Example, "Romney is a racist". There were stories about everyone I plugged into google depicting them as racist, most of which was extremely tenuous. It doesn't matter what is said, how politically correct, they use words like "dog whistle" to twist it to suit their agenda. People got tired of it. We don't worry about what we say being twisted anymore because no matter how it's said, liberals will twist it. That's what they do.
Yeah even the ADL had to come clean and apologize to Bannon .But dipshits like Dave will grasp at any straw any lie to save the DNC.
“The Anti-Defamation League has engaged in the most partisan libelous smear campaign imaginable against Stephen Bannon based on their own political prejudices and bias. One would expect ADL to actually look at the record prior to defaming someone who has proven to not only not be an anti-Semite, but to be a true friend of Israel. After four days of obscene character assassination of Bannon and Breitbart News, ADL has been forced to admit that there is no evidence that Bannon has ever made any anti-Semitic comments. This should provide a cautionary tale for the media that all too often engages in ready, fire, aim narratives unsupported by facts when talking about people they disagree with.
“Everyone in the media who reported this without first checking and ADL in particular owe Stephen Bannon and Breitbart News a front-page apology for their reckless political smear job.
- See more at: http://getliberty.org/2016/11/adl-b...atements-made-by-bannon/#sthash.OsBi08nU.dpuf
Yep, using that logic..Obama is supported by known pedophiles. like Terry Bean....so I guess........Well I'll just let Dave make the connection.B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but, David Duke! Dave said, "David Duke"! That proves it. Because, you know, if a racist supports you, you are a racist. Just like if a child molester supports you, you are a child molester. If a rapist supports you, you are a rapist. That's just science.
There are no stories on Breitbart written by David Duke. But just saying the name "David Duke" in your post about Bannon makes David Duke part of Breitbart. That's just science. Everybody knows that.
Well then I'm proud to say that my tax dollars go to giving you free money from the government. Literally, I am. It makes me sad that you think you deserve free stuff from the government and no one else does, but if you need my money more than I do I'm glad there are makers like me out there to take care of the takers like you.No. I'm a disabled veteran. You got a problem with that?
Well then I'm proud to say that my tax dollars go to giving you free money from the government. Literally, I am. It makes me sad that you think you deserve free stuff from the government and no one else does, but if you need my money more than I do I'm glad there are makers like me out there to take care of the takers like you.