jojosvapes
Drippopotamus
VU Donator
Bronze Contributor
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
ECF Refugee
Reddit Exile
So I have seen a number of threads (online in general not VU) and videos of people claiming that temp control saves battery power or it uses more and everything seemed to be subjective without any real science / numbers to support this.
Some people would say they used the puff counter and got more or less in temp control- again subjective as the duration for each puff is an unknown variable.
Toying around with Escribe I did some monitoring comparing WATT vs Temp Control.
Now I can only say this is for my mod, coil setup etc but I do think the general concept of the data it logged is solid at showing that Temp Control does consume less power over the cycle of a draw.
I did a number of test at different watts, temps and the watts setting in temp. The only consistent I tried to keep was the same amount of vapor production in both modes. Once the vapor production was matched I used these examples.
Oddly enough even if I cranked the temp up higher the trend lines on the graph continued to drop below the wattage line (FYI the wattage setting for my temp control is also set to 100 watts).
Not trying to prove any point or say anyone is wrong as we all have different setups, preferences, and dislikes—but this would suggest that technically temp control does appear to consume less power than wattage mode when vapor production levels are equivalent.
The graph continued to show the same pattern as the image below (First three puffs are wattage, last three are temp control). I thought it was something that was neat / fun to mess with and wanted to share the findings. If this is an old / duplicate post its not intended.
I would be interested if anyone had some other ideas on different data points to collect / test to compare the differences. Not so much to compare just power but to show more specific data difference in the two Happy Vapes everyone.
Some people would say they used the puff counter and got more or less in temp control- again subjective as the duration for each puff is an unknown variable.
Toying around with Escribe I did some monitoring comparing WATT vs Temp Control.
Now I can only say this is for my mod, coil setup etc but I do think the general concept of the data it logged is solid at showing that Temp Control does consume less power over the cycle of a draw.
I did a number of test at different watts, temps and the watts setting in temp. The only consistent I tried to keep was the same amount of vapor production in both modes. Once the vapor production was matched I used these examples.
Oddly enough even if I cranked the temp up higher the trend lines on the graph continued to drop below the wattage line (FYI the wattage setting for my temp control is also set to 100 watts).
Not trying to prove any point or say anyone is wrong as we all have different setups, preferences, and dislikes—but this would suggest that technically temp control does appear to consume less power than wattage mode when vapor production levels are equivalent.
The graph continued to show the same pattern as the image below (First three puffs are wattage, last three are temp control). I thought it was something that was neat / fun to mess with and wanted to share the findings. If this is an old / duplicate post its not intended.
I would be interested if anyone had some other ideas on different data points to collect / test to compare the differences. Not so much to compare just power but to show more specific data difference in the two Happy Vapes everyone.
Last edited: