Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?

  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.
G>O>M

G>O>M

Member For 1 Year
pulsevape said:
I bet that really impresses the chicks stuck on the sheep farms dipshit,
Click to expand...


not really we are pretty gregarious so most have done similar themselves

the politeness im beginning to expect

and ya dont have ta like it .. that was acknowledged in the first post
ya just have to think about it

and i will stop myself doing a personal observation at that point
 
T

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Rossum said:
The FedGov is supposed to be limited in its powers to doing only those things explicitly authorized by the Constitution. I think the ruling in this case is correct, because the law in question cited the Commerce Clause as its authorization. The Commerce Clause has already been abused beyond any standard of sanity since Wickard v. Filburn, and it's about time a court decided that something, anything, actually does not affect interstate commerce.

Now if you want to ban genital mutilation of minors, I'm all for it. But do it at the state level, or find some justification other than the Commerce Clause, and make it equally applicable to minors of both sexes.
Click to expand...
The "Doctor" in question was "performing a service" in commerce which could be considered a crime against humanity. Seems it would apply to regulate said commerce under federal law.

While I am all for limiting the Federal governments powers in test cases, I would hope we could apply a standard of humanity in picking and choosing when we do so. At the very least, strip the operating license of the doctor in question rather than strike down the law until state measures are in place to properly address the issue. Then try the child abuse in a separate proceeding.
 
Last edited:
T

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Rossum said:
Yep. I'm still trying to understand how this is in any way a concern of the US. It didn't happen on US soil, and the "victim" wasn't a US citizen.
Click to expand...
Gotta ask yourself why there is so much interest in the Press in pushing for sanctions against Saudi for this when they did nothing to help the families of 3,000 Americans killed in the 9-11 attacks seek sanctions and reparations for their loss.

It lays bare their complicity with Deep State Intelligence communities working against the strategic & economic interests of the United States.
 
Rossum

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Tpat591 said:
The "Doctor" in question was "performing a service" in commerce which could be considered a crime against humanity. Seems it would apply to regulate said commerce under federal law.
Click to expand...
The Commerce Clause only applies to interstate commerce. Then there's also the question whether the so-called "doctor" was paid? If not, I would contend that no "commerce" occurred.

Tpat591 said:
While I am all for limiting the Federal governments powers in test cases, I would hope we could apply a standard of humanity in picking and choosing when we do so.
Click to expand...
Be careful. That slope you're standing on is very slippery.

Tpat591 said:
At the very least, strip the operating license of the doctor in question rather than strike down the law until state measures are in place to properly address the issue. Then try the child abuse in a separate proceeding.
Click to expand...
By all means. But I'm pretty sure both medical licensing and child abuse are State issues, not Federal.
 
T

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
6LcUMKK7oK6dQVUPFe2PqBT-VsFHx6UAbYqya3QMoGo.jpg
 
SMOKIE

SMOKIE

THE MODFATHER
Staff member
VU Senior Leadership
VU Senior Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
VU Live Leadership
Show Host
Reviewer
Vape Media
VU Live Host
Member For 5 Years
46454596_2156374311041922_1345262866109825024_n.jpg
 
T

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
pulsevape said:
and nobody find this the least bit strange......none of the pussyhat wearing dipshits spewing White hate and screaming at the sky find it at all odd their Party is running ex- spooks for congress.They don't stop to think about it.
Click to expand...

B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Putin was KGB!

That Putin accusation seems a little less sincere after they elect a bunch of ex-spooks.
 
T

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
G>O>M said:
some people have passports

..... with stamps on them

i have spent over 20 years outside my country
about 3 of those was within the 10 years i was in the services

chances are i have seen a bit more than just my own
Click to expand...

I have an apple tree in my yard. For some reason, I don't see how that qualifies me to give advice to an apple orchard farmer. ;)
 
G>O>M

G>O>M

Member For 1 Year
your comparing apples with oranges

but never mind
if i carry on it will evolve into a troll slagging match
so ok
you think like ya been told to
and i will think

c ya
out
 
T

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
G>O>M said:
your comparing apples with oranges

but never mind
if i carry on it will evolve into a troll slagging match
so ok
you think like ya been told to
and i will think

c ya
out
Click to expand...

Well, despite your protests you seem to have gotten the message. Bye. :wave:
 
T

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
She does make it fun & She MAKES you want to believe...


Silver Certificates? Is POTUS having them secretly printed now just as Kennedy & Jackson did?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top