Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Let's us The People, all call an outright General Strike. Let our so called leaders come to our square for negotiations. We The People will not have any leader. We The People will also not have any serfs, slaves. We are ALL ONE and there's no division due to colors, genders, religions, politics. We're all also fed up with how our leaders act in our name yet seldom if ever ask our permission. Yes, General Strike it is. No more war. Period and full stop.


We are going to have to have a repeat of 1861. Democrats wouldnt chill out then either.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Are they leaving for lucrative pay off jobs or are they leaving from the stank she put on the office. makes a wonder.
They ain't going down with her crooked ass. Kim Foxx set up this office to protect criminal trafficking networks & their associates by slapping them on the wrists when they got caught & cutting them loose. Who wants to be known as the Chief Ethics Officer or the Head of the Conviction Integrity Unit in a prosecutor's office ripe with corruption? This latest Director of External Affairs is an interest job title in a Prosecutors office & one could only imagine her responsibility would be to liaise with Federal Agencies. One can easily assume they know their past duties will catch up with them if they stay & they are beating feet to hope that the Feds won't come after them since they already quit. Granted that is all speculation, but I doubt it is far off the mark.

I think we will begin to see a repeating pattern throughout many federal & eventually State agencies moving forward. People jumping ship who are trying to protect themselves from prosecution or while secretly turning evidence to protect themselves months before sweeping housecleaning raids & indictments which are all kept very low key.
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
esqi6oha6ht21.png
 

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Our troops should be on the Mexican side of the border to stop migrants from entering with the support of the Mexican Govt IMHO.

Group of Armed Mexican Soldiers Disarm, Detain US Soldiers on Texas Side of Border


Why they allowed themselves to be disarmed is beyond me. You know it made the cartels nervous they were on the other side of the wall & that is the only reason that this happened.
There is going to be an "incident" - or multiple - damned soon. US troops or "Militia", (which, iirc, are perfectly legit to make a 'citizens arrest'). I would expect another major antigun push, and yet more hand-wringing/humanitarian/evil-orange-man shit to cascade, too.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
This is not a surprise, and no one seems to take these fucknuts to court about it - because it certainly is discrimination.
Yeah between those fuckwits & BOA & Citibank actually freezing the accounts of conservatives if they can be accused as loosely affiliated with a group the Southern Poverty Law Center has defined as a hate group (includes the Alt-Right - a term they apply to anyone supporting Trump) on a take-down request from Media Matters things have gone way over the line. No one should have to sue them. Republican Lawmakers should have criminalized the practice on the first reported incidents of it.
 

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I agree. Unless you are commiting felonious (or traitorous) acts with you accounts, I fail to see how it could even remotely be possible to deny "banking" and access to your funds.

Further, nowdays it's almost impossible to interact with society and employers w/o a bank-account: you never get paid cash (unless it's under the table or you are military), and you still need to hide it somewhere.

Of course, if you want to treat conservatives as traitors and felons, fine: send up that batsignal and we can play your moronic Game Of Thrones, folks.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years

The Lyrics could use an update. Love it when lefties literally meme themselves.
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I agree. Unless you are commiting felonious (or traitorous) acts with you accounts, I fail to see how it could even remotely be possible to deny "banking" and access to your funds.

Further, nowdays it's almost impossible to interact with society and employers w/o a bank-account: you never get paid cash (unless it's under the table or you are military), and you still need to hide it somewhere.

Of course, if you want to treat conservatives as traitors and felons, fine: send up that batsignal and we can play your moronic Game Of Thrones, folks.
A take-down request from anyone in an actual law enforcement agency & only with a legally executed writ from a sitting Judge should be the only way that anything like that should ever be contemplated in the financial services industry. Period. Anything other than that is a crime.
 
Last edited:

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I wouldn't trust the fuzz or courts in this way: either you have a goddamned case and they belong in prison, or not.

We've been waaaay,, WAAAAAYYY too tolerant of judges, lawyers and cops - local, state or fed.
 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
There is going to be an "incident" - or multiple - damned soon. US troops or "Militia", (which, iirc, are perfectly legit to make a 'citizens arrest'). I would expect another major antigun push, and yet more hand-wringing/humanitarian/evil-orange-man shit to cascade, too.


The cartel is having a bitch of a time getting their drugs across the border and before long there is going to be a battle down there. The cartel might hit the militia with a vengeance to warn the military they too will get hit, which will be a huge mistake but druggies are not always that smart. .
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The cartel is having a bitch of a time getting their drugs across the border and before long there is going to be a battle down there. The cartel might hit the militia with a vengeance to warn the military they too will get hit, which will be a huge mistake but druggies are not always that smart. .
I'm sure they have already bought a used TBM from somewhere & the tunnel(s) will be complete before the wall is.
 

MyMagicMist

Diamond Contributor
ECF Refugee
Member For 5 Years
Our troops should be on the Mexican side of the border to stop migrants from entering with the support of the Mexican Govt IMHO.

Group of Armed Mexican Soldiers Disarm, Detain US Soldiers on Texas Side of Border


Why they allowed themselves to be disarmed is beyond me. You know it made the cartels nervous they were on the other side of the wall & that is the only reason that this happened.

I think if and it is one of these odd and tricky ifs too. If we're still following international law & Geneva Convention, the soldiers had no choice but to allow themselves disarmed, at least for the show of it or good faith. Acting as an American soldier you still need to comply to host country/nation laws when you visit. Consider the International uproar, "Armed American Soldiers Invade Mexico!" So, I am speculating whoever the immediate team/s leader on site was, they chose to allow being disarmed in order to avoid such optics as it is called.

Our troops should be on the Mexican side of the border

They were right after Obama took office. There was a green light for a battalion of SF Rangers to go in and tackle the cartel issue/s in the best feasible manner the on site command structure decided upon. There was a fall back to an infiltration and decoy strategy used in 'Nam I believe it was called Operation Phoenix, until the civilian casualties began outweighing the cartel ones. The Rangers played dress up as cartel men A and shoot up cartel me B, run off, don cartel C's garb, shoot up cartel A, wash, rinse and repeat until either your team kills 'em all or they implode upon one another killing themselves out.

I know this from having open clear text coded talk with a few buddies that were either Rangers from Army side or Rangers from Navy & SEAL side. I was told two days before Obama hit office, "an op in Mexico is on a table". As I said once the cartel started using civilians as bullet proofing, the ops stopped, soldiers withdrew only offering covering support fire & direly accurate at that. They got staged for 3 month until someone redeployed them, scrubbed any idea of trying to route Mexico of all cartels. Some offered views that possibly the CIA folk got to the cartels, wised them up and used the last ditch strategy of dead civilians to get the op stopped. That was never accused openly, never denied openly, never confirmed openly either, ... just suspected. CIA does use drug money after all. That's been known, as common knowledge, since late 1970's to early 1980's.

We also do not have operatives in other places in the world where folks would least expect. That however well it's .. "look, it's Jack Webb!" *turns, looks and runs off*

Sorry, it was Mr. Webb. He had coffee. I have no coffee. See the problem? *grins* So, yeah you might want to understand there is a metric ton of poop going on all the time but it is not always brought out in the open. I mean it would be silly at best for me to say to you here in public, "gee, I think I'll go rob the Ripley branch of the Credit Union", then go do so and wonder why a S.W.A.T team shows up at my apartment door. Silly I tell you, silly like you actually robbing the Ripley Kroger's instead and getting away with it because you called the SWAT team on me. I have no intention what so ever of robbing any entity this morning. I might hassle Mr. Webb's spirit to get some coffee, though.

To offer another example, my wife's grandfather one day out of the blue asks me, "Barn, ya growing any wacky xxxx down in the creek bottom you not told me about?" I looked him up and down, took a deep sigh, shook my head and replied. "Well, if I've not yet told you about it, ... why would expect me to tell you about it now?"

He laughed. "Ah, so you do."

I chuckled and said back, "you planted it if you find it."

He went serious. "Well that other fella he tried and got his butt dusted for his troubles."

I shook my head at that as well. "And I'm supposed to be as dumb as him, put it right here under your nose, if I do it?"

He grinned and winked. He also threatened to shoot me as we walked through the bottom and he carried a loaded weapon behind me. My answer to that put him off his game too, I never missed a stride. "Better only take you one shot but I don't figure you're a man to shoot somebody in the back." Still kept on walking even hearing the hammer cocked.

I don't get scared too easily, possibly a detriment, though that'll be something I don't change.

Speaking on change. Check this out. Then, consider having robot bosses.

 
Last edited:

MyMagicMist

Diamond Contributor
ECF Refugee
Member For 5 Years
Easter Sunday explosions at multiple churches and hotels rock Sri Lanka, death tolls rises past 200


https://www.foxnews.com/world/easte...MBcph7-I939BPoeg4boRHH1OQMifUsZ00BJ_q7iEUNxdY


Looks like the peace loving muslims are at it again.


Defense Minister Ruwan Wijewardena, who described the attacks as a terrorist incident and blamed religious extremists ...

No one immediately claimed responsibility for Sunday’s blasts.

I think it was the folks that worship bombs. Wait a minute, that doesn't read properly, I worship bombs. No never mind, I actually worship no thing, no idea, no entity. But I am not a devotee of nihilism. I am an apathetic agnostic. Well, to me that says thugs or pharisees and possibly even both. Yep, folks that worship death. Funny. What are people that worship life called?

I think, let all of us reserve anger and indignation for the genuine culprits before we slap around a wide brush. Romans used to sack whole towns painting them red with such wide brushes, the red in this case was blood. Romans also used the poison the well tactic. "If I alone cannot have the well, no one shall." I'm merely stating verified fact of doctrines, stratagems. Yep, I looked it up in way too many places. See all that vapor coming from my "hills"? That's my singular brain cell asploding. :) "All your vape are belong to me!"

Ugh! Um, Erm ... Argh! :zombie:

Translation from grumpy self language, if required, ... "Hey yo, I'm a gonna ..."*flashes two fingers* Run 'er slow, eh. *hugs*
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
How about you take that money & invest it in helping the homeless find a pathway to housing as well as physical, economic & social recovery?

Seattle Elites Hire PR Firm For Damage Control On Homeless, ******, & Now HIV Epidemics
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Can I bid for Crucifixion? I mean, OK, a slow-hanging is ok, but - yeah.. we need the televised screaming and wailing.
Sure there will be plenty of televised screaming and wailing as they climb the gallows & the rope is placed, but if you insist, I'm ok with shortening the rope just enough to prevent their necks from immediately snapping so they can spend their last 5 minutes contemplating the error of their ways as you enjoy watching them writhe & wriggle in agony until the twitching stops. Fair enough?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top