The reason that I asked is that since 4 members of the panel were removed, any and all work that they performed on the deeming regulations should also be kicked to the curb. I would expect that CASAA champion the effort to have that happen. What good is kicking 4 members of a panel to the curb, if the material work that they did while on the panel is left in place? The 4 new members should have the opportunity to provide their input on the deeming regulation, and therefore the process should start over from scratch using a clean sheet of paper with the new panel in place.
I was not disputing the fact that it actually happened.
I just read the second link provided... Health disparities? WTF... If there were proof that vaping improves the health of minorities, she would side with vaping, but if it only helps improves the health of non minorities, she would go against it? That's a load of crap. If it can be proven to help any portion of the population, she should support it. I think she should be disqualified based on the fact t hat she is biased towards only a segment of the population, and we need someone whose focus is on the whole of the population. Grrrrr...