Just curious .. what are the benefits of using (one) piece of wire for both coils as apposed to wrapping 2 coils separately
Two separate pieces of wire will be a parallel dual build. The net resistance will be one half the resistance of a single coil. In other words, two 1.0Ω coils, fit in parallel (each with it's own ground), you divide the value of a single coil (1.0Ω ÷ 2) = 0.5Ω net resistance.
If you have more than two individual wires, it's still "parallel". but you divide the resistance of one coil by the number of wires, to produce the net. A quad (4 wire) parallel at 0.5Ω is made of four 2.0Ω wires. (2.0Ω ÷ 4) = 0.5Ω.
This is the purpose of RDAs that can use multiple, individual wires, to obtain a lower resistance without an excessive wire mass/density (and the lower heat flux value of thicker wire for a given wattage - like a resistance controlled mech output), as well as a rapid "heat capacity" (time-to-temperature).
A single wire, to make multiple coils is called "series". Regardless of the number of individual coils made from a single wire, the resistance is that of one wire.
Why does it matter? Simple. For a given wire gauge and net resistance, with 'X' wattage, the "heat flux" (radiant coil temperature) will be higher with a single vs. a multiple coil build.
Example: Using a mech mod (where resistance and voltage determine wattage output), a 0.6 Ohm single coil made from 24 gauge wire running at the Ohm's law determined value of 29.4 watts, will have a "warm" heat flux of 213 mW/mm². If we build that as a 24 gauge dual parallel, with 0.6Ω net resistance, the heat flux drops to a dismally cold 53 mW/mm².
To obtain a similar heat flux as our 24 gauge single coil, we need thinner wire... 28 to be specific, at 214 mW/mm²... or, if we have a hi-wattage output regulated mod, we can just crank up the wattage of our 26 gauge dual parallel build to 116-117 watts to obtain the 213 mW/mm² that we had to start with.
I actually wrote an article on this (well three articles actually) The first two are found at the end of the second sigline hyperlink below... and the most recent,
here.