I can’t fault Carambrda for what he says when it comes to battery mech safety and knowledge one should have. Even regarding the almost useless info that is displayed on regulated mods ( IMO only two matter... watts and battery meter aka rested voltage read)
He’s always been concise, mostly to the point ( some run on, but that’s just him ramming the point home)
I can see where those sensitive can object to his vernacular, but IMO he’s been right nearly every time.
Do I agree with his way of delivery?
Not always... but I can’t recall where his knowledge didn’t align with mine...
And please believe me and I’ve said it many of times... I’m truly an asshole in person... but I’ve also learned although I’m right... I don’t need to hammer that sentiment.
This goes the same for rebuttals...
There is a time one can concede to those more knowledgeable even if their opinion and what’s worked for them is incorrect.
I for one won’t ever put him on ignore... his knowledge base is just immense; and most of the time when I find myself not agreeing... I check myself and my knowledge against his, and more times than not it’s just a different view of the same result.
Like math... how many variants expressed can give the answer 42... there is more than one and all true.
Like watts law to determine amp draw on a regulated mod...
NonDNA mods I lump into the 85% efficiency, this has been the lowest I’ve come across, probably not the actual lowest.
He would find out the actual efficiency which could be 87%...
Then we can do the equation
I do
Watts divided by battery count divided by 3.2v divided by .85 (non dna)
But!
You’d need to divide by the actual cut off set on the mod... I chose 3.2v for most batteries at that or near that voltage will sag below it, although not always 100% and will give you the weak battery prompt. Then divide by the actual efficiency (dna200/250s are 97%)
In the end like I said... I can’t fault him for he’s been right nearly all the time