I sub to both of them, because both of them truly have their merits. Meanwhile, living in the real world, both of them also have their downfalls.
Stefan has great ideas regarding life without governments, but often can be too animated about things he feels strongly about. He has had some rants where I simply say 'ok man, going a bit overboard here', while others would think hes completely out of his mind. But thats what happens when you challenge ideas that have been drilled into our heads, as ultimately moral and generally good.
Thunderfoot has awesome information regarding science and religion, but is a flaming liberal who thinks government is necessary to save humans from themselves.
I give stef the edge here, for being realistic and unafraid to be crazy. Has he lied about his wifes actions on multiple occasions, yes. On the same side of the coin, thunderfoot supports authoritarian control of humans in all ways and promotes it as a general good, so he might as well be lying too.