I wish it was only about liquid. I could live with that.
Fact is FSPTC says it's about hardware. Fact is PACT says it's about shipping. These laws were not written with ecigs in mind. The government has given me no reason to believe they won't use those laws to say the regulation extends to hardware and that "non-combusted" applies to shipping ecig stuff.
Actually my comment mentions cigars. I bring up the excuses they give to exempt $10 cigars because kids can't afford them but want to include $100 ecigs because kids will afford them.
I'm curious what you want people to comment on. If the proposal isn't bad why shouldn't vapers just accept it?
Fact is FSPTC says it's about hardware. Fact is PACT says it's about shipping. These laws were not written with ecigs in mind. The government has given me no reason to believe they won't use those laws to say the regulation extends to hardware and that "non-combusted" applies to shipping ecig stuff.
Actually my comment mentions cigars. I bring up the excuses they give to exempt $10 cigars because kids can't afford them but want to include $100 ecigs because kids will afford them.
I'm curious what you want people to comment on. If the proposal isn't bad why shouldn't vapers just accept it?