BWAHAHAThey do.
And they watch you too
BWAHAHAThey do.
i think some TV's might listen to you now
As long as they don' talk back.....
They do.
BWAHAHA
And they watch you too
Just curious, and if you don't want to say that's sure fine, but did you get injured as a chef?I started out on a Gateway computer help line. Then I started working as a computer programmer. After a few years I got bored with that and apprenticed myself. Eventually I became a master baker and pastry chef. I did that for years till I got injured. Now I'm on disability living off the government.
Just curious, and if you don't want to say that's sure fine, but did you get injured as a chef?
Wow, sorry to hear that. That is awful. My mind went to sharp knives and such, nothing like that.I went into a walk in freezer that had ice on the floor. I slipped and landed directly on my knee pulverizing all the cartilage. After they operated that knee kept buckling and I ended up falling on the other knee. I can barely stand some days.
I cut my hand open once but the surgeon did a fantastic job putting it back together. I was out for a month but was able to go back to work. I was a lot more careful with knives after that!Wow, sorry to hear that. That is awful. My mind went to sharp knives and such, nothing like that.
I'll bet! I would imagine chef's have all kinds of knive horror stories. I don't cook much, or use a knife much for that matter. But one time I was slicing a bagel witha serrated knife, stood it on its side in my palm. Went right through the bagle, and right through half of my hand I leave the sharp stuff to wifey nowI cut my hand open once but the surgeon did a fantastic job putting it back together. I was out for a month but was able to go back to work. I was a lot more careful with knives after that!
I went into a walk in freezer that had ice on the floor. I slipped and landed directly on my knee pulverizing all the cartilage. After they operated that knee kept buckling and I ended up falling on the other knee. I can barely stand some days.
Btw, I remember Gateway. I had an old roomate that worked for them for a while. They were very good to him if I remember correctly. I wonder if they are still around?
Yeah, I know he was really sad when they closed up here. He went to Circuit City, Beef A Roo, and many paper routes just to make what he did there. The guy was nuts. Would work 18 or 19 hours a day, game for 2 or 3, sleep for 1 or 2, then do it all over again. Seven days a week. Never stopped talking about Gateway though.I remember them, too. Ordered and installed hundreds of Gateway personal computers in our company when we were first setting every employee up with a PC. Had plenty of contact with their salespeople and with customer service. They were top-notch for us and I was very, very fond of that company.
Definitely around at least longer than they were here then. It had to be 15-20 years ago the one here closed.I am currently using a computer that says Gateway on the front. Bought about 3 years or so ago at Wally World.
Windoze 8.1 in it. No compalints with the PC.
I have an older one loaded with XP pro down in the Vape Bunker.
Can't remember but I think the name rights got bought out by someone.Definitely around at least longer than they were here then. It had to be 15-20 years ago the one here closed.
Ah, that is interesting. We have two Acer LT's, and love them. Super cheap and have had them for a long time.Can't remember but I think the name rights got bought out by someone.
googled.
Gateway Inc., previously Gateway 2000, was an American computer hardware company based in South Dakota and later California, that developed, manufactured, supported, and marketed a wide range of personal computers, computer monitors, servers, and computer accessories. It was acquired by Acer in October 2007.
Ah, that is interesting. We have two Acer LT's, and love them. Super cheap and have had them for a long time.
I have a Asus LT as well. I have put three hard drives in that thing Luckily I know a guylol! Three of our tablets and two of our laptops are Acer (here at home). I only recently changed to Asus Zenpad tablets.
use only WD drives.I have a Asus LT as well. I have put three hard drives in that thing Luckily I know a guy
No clue what that means.....use only WD drives.
At least no seagates.
Western digital, makers of quality hard drive storage solutions.No clue what that means.....
A lot also depends on your own personal definition of "crappy". Successful datacenter companies like Backblaze have been very well aware of Seagate's relatively high drive failure rates for ages, but it didn't stop them from buying more Seagate drives anyhow so, the potential risk of permanent data loss caused by multiple drive failures comes first and foremost from having an inferior data backup strategy, not the actual drive's annual failure rate (AFR).Western digital, makers of quality hard drive storage solutions.
Seagate.... makers of cheap crappy hard drives that whine and die.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Thank you for reminding me why I do not make use of my college education in computer networking, programming and repair.A lot also depends on your own personal definition of "crappy". Successful datacenter companies like Backblaze have been very well aware of Seagate's relatively high drive failure rates for ages, but it didn't stop them from buying more Seagate drives anyhow so, the potential risk of permanent data loss caused by multiple drive failures comes first and foremost from having an inferior data backup strategy, not the actual drive's annual failure rate (AFR).
Granted, not all data is critical enough to everyone for it to be worth the extra cost, time, and effort spent on making real backup copies so, yes of course keeping every one of all of the drives up and running 24/7 in a NAS can be an excellent choice to consider because, yes of course there's still always the option to let the data volume rebuild itself by using some certain types of data redundancy options (be it in RAID configuration or otherwise). But not all data needs to be accessible 24/7. That is, not to me it doesn't. Each time when I know beforehand I won't be accessing a certain drive for at least a little while, I just force it to sleep, and, if the drive in question is the type of cheap green desktop drive that automatically goes to sleep in such a cheap way that it gives me no power management setting that would have allowed me to make it stay awake, I just work my way around that problem via software if necessary so it still doesn't bother me one bit... I can't watch 500 movie titles at once, and, I certainly can't listen to 20,000 music albums at once.
And data companies have parallel data so none is lost...A lot also depends on your own personal definition of "crappy". Successful datacenter companies like Backblaze have been very well aware of Seagate's relatively high drive failure rates for ages, but it didn't stop them from buying more Seagate drives anyhow so, the potential risk of permanent data loss caused by multiple drive failures comes first and foremost from having an inferior data backup strategy, not the actual drive's annual failure rate (AFR).
Granted, not all data is critical enough to everyone for it to be worth the extra cost, time, and effort spent on making real backup copies so, yes of course keeping every one of all of the drives up and running 24/7 in a NAS can be an excellent choice to consider because, yes of course there's still always the option to let the data volume rebuild itself by using some certain types of data redundancy options (be it in RAID configuration or otherwise). But not all data needs to be accessible 24/7. That is, not to me it doesn't. Each time when I know beforehand I won't be accessing a certain drive for at least a little while, I just force it to sleep, and, if the drive in question is the type of cheap green desktop drive that automatically goes to sleep in such a cheap way that it gives me no power management setting that would have allowed me to make it stay awake, I just work my way around that problem via software if necessary so it still doesn't bother me one bit... I can't watch 500 movie titles at once, and, I certainly can't listen to 20,000 music albums at once.
That's why I haven't bought Western Digital over the past decade. I don't need NAS or RAID for anything I do, so they're simply too expensive by comparison. My oldest drive that I haven't decommissioned yet is a 10-year old USB 2.0 WD Elements 1TB, whereas my newest one is still only an 8TB Seagate Barracuda (ST8000DM004) that I snagged off of Amazon for a shin more than a few years ago... I own well over a dozen external drives. Of all the laptops I ever had, the only one that had a WD inside was the one that crashed, and, out of a dozen or so Seagate drives I only had one Seagate crash─it was the 3TB infamous model number that had an exceptional very high failure rate as was later confirmed by Backblaze back then. I believe it's called luck of the draw because every brand has had the occasional bad model, and, eventually, all drives fail so in the end the money is still better spent towards adding more drives as opposed to keep praying for the so-called "non-crappy" ones to pay off well enough to justify their hefty price premium.And data companies have parallel data so none is lost...
Your personal computer does not. At least for the vast majority of us. Very few of us have NAS or RAID array storage, etc.
That's why I haven't bought Western Digital over the past decade. I don't need NAS or RAID for anything I do, so they're simply too expensive by comparison. My oldest drive that I haven't decommissioned yet is a 10-year old USB 2.0 WD Elements 1TB, whereas my newest one is still only an 8TB Seagate Barracuda (ST8000DM004) that I snagged off of Amazon for a shin more than a few years ago... I own well over a dozen external drives. Of all the laptops I ever had, the only one that had a WD inside was the one that crashed, and, out of a dozen or so Seagate drives I only had one Seagate crash─it was the 3TB infamous model number that had an exceptional very high failure rate as was later confirmed by Backblaze back then. I believe it's called luck of the draw because every brand has had the occasional bad model, and, eventually, all drives fail so in the end the money is still better spent towards adding more drives as opposed to keep praying for the so-called "non-crappy" ones to pay off well enough to justify their hefty price premium.
I remember when 12 inch platters held an amazing 1 MB.1Tb for $45.
Sure doesn't seem like it was all that long ago we upgraded an AS/400 with 1 Gb of mirrored EMC2 DASD, which filled up a cabinet the size of a porta-potty, took an EMC service rep all day to install, and cost $40,000.00.
I remember the joy when I upgraded my Apple II+ to 64KI remember when 12 inch platters held an amazing 1 MB.
And first started out with magnetic core memory.
Remember punched tapes?
I have been looking at 1 TB drives to add a second drive to my main desktop PC.
will just mirror the first drive to it as a backup.
Well they had to keep up with CommodoreI remember the joy when I upgraded my Apple II+ to 64K
Are you using Windows? Does your system have an SSD?Hmm been looking at 1 TB drives on Amazon the WD Blue and Seagate Barracuda are the same price. $45. 1 TB is as big as I want as they still take forever to fill or copy esp if in a USB situation.
I had one of them too, traded it for a fish tank, sorry I did not get into the amiga line till the end.Well they had to keep up with Commodore
NO SSD just a WD blue drive in there. It is a Gatrway PC.Are you using Windows? Does your system have an SSD?
I did not do Amiga but had a C128 ran CPM on it.I had one of them too, traded it for a fish tank, sorry I did not get into the amiga line till the end.
If the new one is to replace the system drive in the Gateway, an SSD is the single best upgrade.NO SSD just a WD blue drive in there. It is a Gatrway PC.
Not sure if my hardware/bios would support the latest HDD or SSD throughput.If the new one is to replace the system drive in the Gateway, an SSD is the single best upgrade.
There's no way I would ever go back to a hdd for anything,, but back-up or storage if I needed a lot of space.
I may not have a need for a faster puter, but I hate waiting for it to finish booting.Not sure if my hardware/bios would support the latest HDD or SSD throughput.
Also not sure about long term life of SSD's. They use memory which has a limited number of read/write cycles and do all kinds of manipulations to work around this problem.
And the final straw is they cost much more than a good HDD and I have no need for faster HDD anyway.
Now if I did video rendering and such much....
I also play no video games which often require mo power!
I just saw that ^.I have been looking at 1 TB drives to add a second drive to my main desktop PC.
will just mirror the first drive to it as a backup.
It would support it as long as the bios has AHCI setting. Throughput? HDD is slowest part of the PC. HDD can't transfer data fast enough to utilize the rest of the PC's ability as it is. It's like sipping through a straw instead of just gulping it down. The capability is there, but it's using a straw.Not sure if my hardware/bios would support the latest HDD or SSD throughput.
Also not sure about long term life of SSD's. They use memory which has a limited number of read/write cycles and do all kinds of manipulations to work around this problem.
And the final straw is they cost much more than a good HDD and I have no need for faster HDD anyway.
Now if I did video rendering and such much....
I also play no video games which often require mo power!
You tried powder coating a mod? Seems like it would hold up well.I've had a variety of different jobs throughout my life. Roofer, plant maintenance, landscaping, painter, line cook, waiter, salesman, assistant chef, carpenter, meat cutter, hanging cable, pretty much whatever paid the bills and supported a bad drinking/drug problem.
Now 46 years old, clean and sober I have had the same job for the last 5 years as a Powder Coater. And trust me, I am glad I no longer live life in the "fast lane"!
Sent from my LGL722DL using Tapatalk
I just saw that ^.
It would support it as long as the bios has AHCI setting. Throughput? HDD is slowest part of the PC. HDD can't transfer data fast enough to utilize the rest of the PC's ability as it is. It's like sipping through a straw instead of just gulping it down. The capability is there, but it's using a straw.
Before Multi Level Cell was SLC-single level cell. SSD's became popular for mainstream use when MLC technology came around and made it affordable. $ pr GB still more expensive than HDD, but low enough to make it worth it due to it's performance. Manufacturers made / consumers used 60 - 120GB drives for the OS and programs, and changed the path for everything else to send it to a secondary HDD. I wrote an article for how to set up Windows to to do that, and all the tricks to ensure SSD health and longevity, because without being on the market long enough, the worry was limited read/write cycles.
These day I don't use all the tricks in Windows and Windows registry edits, as they've proven to last as long as a HDD.
Video rendering, video games, anything like that, that requires loading large amounts of data would benefit, but a ram disk would be better. As far as playing a movie/video, just keeping them on HDD is best since they use a lot of space and won't playback any better on a faster drive.
As far as video games or things that require more power, that would be a cpu upgrade since SSD would only load it to memory faster and if like earlier, if it was already on memory, aka ram disk....
Most have no real NEED for faster. Sure makes the computing experience a lot better. Everyone I've ever known that didn't need faster and went from HDD to SSD has said they will never go back,,,everyone.
There's a little more to swapping C to a different drive.
Since your merely looking to mirror a back up,...If you're using something new enough to have SATA connectors you should be able to load a driver for most any HDD. Before HDD install, best to load driver to a thumb/flash drive/disc first, then to PC.
My whole post here refers to Windows. You too?
I am running Windoze 8.1 and I keep it clean and it boots pretty darned fast for me.I may not have a need for a faster puter, but I hate waiting for it to finish booting.
Probably Sata 3.0,,,,and 6.0 has been out for that long. Your good to go with a back up HDD. Windows originally comes with a package of drivers so your probably ok there, just good to go to manuf site for the one you choose and dl/install prior just to take the guesswork out that it has the correct one, and not a possible generic one that would probably work but.....Yep Windoze 8.1 on the machine in question.
I keep it clean as possible to to make it work as fast as it will.
And Sata drive interface. Not sure what version 1,2, 3? Prolly not 3 as the machine is at least 5 or 5 years old.
I also am stuck with DSL internet. And browsing is mostly what I do with this machine.
So why would I need a lot of speed?
Do you have a good recommendation for drive mirroring/bitcopy software?Probably Sata 3.0,,,,and 6.0 has been out for that long. Your good to go with a back up HDD. Windows originally comes with a package of drivers so your probably ok there, just good to go to manuf site for the one you choose and dl/install prior just to take the guesswork out that it has the correct one, and not a possible generic one that would probably work but.....
I hear ya on internet, but your probably not using all of DHL's speed with a HDD. But anyways...
...The speed would be in the boot up and shut down, and interaction you have with Windows, snappier, faster responses, whether your browsing, surfing, online > or not.
You don't need speed to function unless you get it, then you'll need it .
Kind of a moot point anyways, unless you want to change drive that has the OS, and that's a task. Not hard, but certainly more than getting a back up drive.
You know? I wouldn't mirror a single drive being used for the OS and all the rest on a PC. I would just back up all the rest and if something happens to the current drive, just reinstall Windows if your able to save the drive. If not you could probably install W on a new drive without buying the OS.
A fresh install also improves performance.