Another Shark Attack: Orange County woman claims deceptive advertising against e-liquid sellers

[5150sick]

This time the Sharks attack Cuttwood for not telling people about Diacetyl/Ap
Problem is it wasn't deceptive as Cuttwood never claimed that stff WASN'T in their Eliquid.

I want to copy/paste something from a Facebook post over the 5pawns thing


The lawsuit is frivolous but people have been deceived.

But in an unregulated industry if you are lied to or someone takes your money and doesn't ship you the product (see the dozens of "group buys" that have gone all wrong in the past 3 years) you are just beat.

it's up to you to do the research yourself in an unregulated industry.

A vendor can piss in a bottle and call it eliquid.
All you could do is call them out and try to make sure no one else buys a bottle of piss.

This is why there are 5 million juice vendors and 85% of them have a shit product.

Because unregulated means:

1) Put shit in a bottle and sell it QUICK.! get in, get money, get out To a lot of fly by night "juice vendors"

OR

2) it means sell a great, clean, wonderful tasting, stand up product to a select few that wish to become leaders of a future regulated industry

http://legalnewsline.com/stories/51...eceptive-advertising-against-e-liquid-sellers

 

[stevegmu]

Non disclosure can be just as bad as false claims... I see many, many of these class action suits in the near future, while some vendors will cling to DA/AP until the end, as they can't make good e-liquids without it... I think Nikoticket will be up soon...

 

[5150sick]

All they need to do is put:
"this product may contain diacelyl/AP"
Put it directly under the prop 65 warning


This would end all the frivolous lawsuits
How much would a sticker like that cost it you bought them by the tens of thousands? Maybe 3 cents per sticker.
So then instead of getting $22.00 for a $2 bottle of eliquid they will be getting $22.00 for a $2.03 bottle of eliquid.

 

[stevegmu]

All they need to do is put:
"this product may contain diacelyl/AP"
Put it directly under the prop 65 warning


This would end all the frivolous lawsuits
How much would a sticker like that cost it you bought them by the tens of thousands? Maybe 3 cents per sticker.
So then instead of getting $22.00 for a $2 bottle of eliquid they will be getting $22.00 for a $2.03 bottle of eliquid.

They may lose sales if they warn their customers...

 

[5150sick]

They may lose sales if they warn their customers...

They may lose millions in lawyer fees if they don't

 

[pulsevape]

unscrupulos vendors will sell rat poision to make a quick buck,and fold their tent and move onto the next scam.....how many douchebag B&M owners have you met that don't know shit about vaping,they just get a boatload of chinese shit and dump it on ignorant noobs....and unsrupulous parasites are going to go ambulance chasing over spilling hot coffee in their laps...