Critical Thinking 101: Source Evaluation

[5150sick]

http://casaa.org/research-studies/critical-thinking-101-source-evaluation/

This one should be simple but is often missed by vaping advocates.

If some Doctor writes a 100% biased article that sounds like it was written by Stan Glantz and that Doctor is a fucking foot Doctor then he/she has no business speaking to ANYONE ANYWHERE about vaping to start with.

This should immediately be brought to the attention of readers in the comment section.

To word it oppositely, Why would anyone go to Stan Glantz for questions about an ingrown toenail? - 5150

 

[Rabbit Slayer]

Why would anyone go to Stan Glantz for questions about an ingrown toenail? - 5150

I see nothing in Stan's history that makes him an expert of matters of the pulmonary system...but I'm pretty sure he would be able to treat an ingrown toenail

 

[5150sick]

I see nothing in Stan's history that makes him an expert of matters of the pulmonary system...but I'm pretty sure he would be able to treat an ingrown toenail

Or at the very least preform an oil change on your car?

"Glantz obtained a BSc in aerospace engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 1969, an MSc in applied mechanics from Stanford University in 1970, and in 1973, a PhD from Stanford in applied mechanics "