5150sick
Under Ground Hustler
Staff member
VU Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
Mod Team Leader
http://www.salisburypost.com/2016/07/07/the-truth-about-e-cigs/
My alter ego posted one hell of a comment directly to the author who decided to make a stupid comment in the comments section:
"This has caused many different states to enact laws banning the sale of flavored e-liquids to diminish the impact that they have on youth."
Could you tell us about these entire states that have flavor bans on eliquid?
I’ll save you some time - There are none.
Did you miss the study where over 60% of teens in the largest yearly survey on smoking and drug use reported not using nicotine at all when they used ecigarettes?
https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-t...ring-future-survey-overview-findings-2015#AC1
On to the "unknown" but actually known safety of vaping.
Did you miss the memo from public health England that vaping is 95% less harmful than tobacco smoking?
How about the one from the 32,000 doctors:
"Royal College of Physicians Says E-Cigarettes Can 'Prevent Almost All the Harm from Smoking"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...armful-than-tobacco-estimates-landmark-review
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0
These are Government agencies and actual Doctors putting out truthful information in the UK.
We use seatbelts to reduce the harm of driving, condoms to reduce the harms of unprotected sex, methadone maintenance and needle exchange programs to reduce the harms of ****** addiction.
Why shouldn't’ we be using this product to reduce the harms of nicotine addiction through cigarette smoking?
England is and their government is on board.
Is 95% safer not safe enough for the CDC?
Shouldn't you be trying to dig deeper to find out why the CDC is lying to us all?
That would make for one hell of a news story wouldn't it?
Let's see if this fuckwit Ian Powers is going to reply or not - 5150
My alter ego posted one hell of a comment directly to the author who decided to make a stupid comment in the comments section:
"This has caused many different states to enact laws banning the sale of flavored e-liquids to diminish the impact that they have on youth."
Could you tell us about these entire states that have flavor bans on eliquid?
I’ll save you some time - There are none.
Did you miss the study where over 60% of teens in the largest yearly survey on smoking and drug use reported not using nicotine at all when they used ecigarettes?
https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-t...ring-future-survey-overview-findings-2015#AC1
On to the "unknown" but actually known safety of vaping.
Did you miss the memo from public health England that vaping is 95% less harmful than tobacco smoking?
How about the one from the 32,000 doctors:
"Royal College of Physicians Says E-Cigarettes Can 'Prevent Almost All the Harm from Smoking"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...armful-than-tobacco-estimates-landmark-review
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0
These are Government agencies and actual Doctors putting out truthful information in the UK.
We use seatbelts to reduce the harm of driving, condoms to reduce the harms of unprotected sex, methadone maintenance and needle exchange programs to reduce the harms of ****** addiction.
Why shouldn't’ we be using this product to reduce the harms of nicotine addiction through cigarette smoking?
England is and their government is on board.
Is 95% safer not safe enough for the CDC?
Shouldn't you be trying to dig deeper to find out why the CDC is lying to us all?
That would make for one hell of a news story wouldn't it?
Let's see if this fuckwit Ian Powers is going to reply or not - 5150
Last edited:
