5150sick
Under Ground Hustler
Staff member
VU Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
Mod Team Leader
If i had to guess i'd say it was this study where the purposely dry burned a CE4 Clearo at 5 volts to produce an unvapeable substance then checked that cloud of burntness for formaldehyde but didn't really find ANY formaldehyde at all:
"If we assume that inhaling formaldehyde-releasing agents carries the same risk per unit of formaldehyde as the risk associated with inhaling gaseous formaldehyde,"
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1413069
We all know what happens when we ASSume right?
Which was quickly debunked here:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1502242
But Who Know's?
it's the fucking inquirer for Christ's Sake - 5150
http://business.inquirer.net/210814/increased-cancer-risk-with-electronic-cigarettes
"If we assume that inhaling formaldehyde-releasing agents carries the same risk per unit of formaldehyde as the risk associated with inhaling gaseous formaldehyde,"
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1413069
We all know what happens when we ASSume right?
Which was quickly debunked here:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1502242
But Who Know's?
it's the fucking inquirer for Christ's Sake - 5150
http://business.inquirer.net/210814/increased-cancer-risk-with-electronic-cigarettes
Last edited:
