If you buy something through this post, IGN may get a share of the sale. For more, read our Terms of Use.
After Samsung broke the mold with its 49-inch super ultrawide CHG90 (review), plenty of other manufacturers have rushed to get in on the fun. However, unlike the offerings we’ve reviewed from Samsung and Viotek (review), Philips has opted for a higher resolution, lower refresh rate display in its $1,300 499P9H (See it on Amazon). I tried it out to see if it was worth that heaping pile of cash.
Continue reading…
Continue reading...
After Samsung broke the mold with its 49-inch super ultrawide CHG90 (review), plenty of other manufacturers have rushed to get in on the fun. However, unlike the offerings we’ve reviewed from Samsung and Viotek (review), Philips has opted for a higher resolution, lower refresh rate display in its $1,300 499P9H (See it on Amazon). I tried it out to see if it was worth that heaping pile of cash.
Continue reading…
Continue reading...