TFV4 triple coils -vs- quad coils

[philsubOhms]

Can anyone tell me if the quad coils are worth buying, i have only used the triple coils, and i notice with those they take awhile to break in, and you have to use them at least at 70 watts and up. i hear the quad coils chuck way more clouds then triple coils. just trying to convince myself if the quad coils are worth snagging. I usually am a 60 watt - 100 watt vaper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Teresa P]

I really like both and to me, the difference is minimal. I run either at around 80-82w and get huge clouds with both, flavor is equally tremendous. If I were you, I'd buy one ( I've seen sites that sell them individually ), and judge for myself.

 

[raymo2u]

I hted the Triple coilhead...I let 2 sit in a tub of my liquid and then put them in and it still somehow gave a few dry hits the first hits I took and then they were destroyed....The quads are the only heads I will buy as none Ive used has issues and vaped amazingly. I use the TF-R2 and TF-RCA the most now though...I dont mind regular coils but my coils just seem much more efficient.
Even the Smok Clapton Coils arent as good as making your own like these:

 

[OneBadWolf]

I've used both the triple and the quad coils, the biggest difference I've found is that the quad has much much more airflow. The triples are fairly easy to rebuild. Personally, I have had no break in problem with the triples.

That being said, like the above poster I usually use the dual RBA and more recently the Clapton RBA. The Clapton RBA is my new favorite. I currently am running a 4mm 22 gauge spaced 304 SS coil on it, and cannot even percieve a difference between it and the Clapton wire. The sweet spot seems to be about 43-48 watts, roughly half of the tri, quad or dual RBA. On my X Cube 2, I go the better part of 2 days before switching batts, and the Clapton RBA is dirt simple and super fast to re-wick. The standard single RBA is a bit shit IMO, and I converted mine to a vertical RBA