Become a Patron!

Where we stand now { CNN }

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Wow...when you look at it like that...it seems they have no intention o telling the truth,
 

5150sick

Under Ground Hustler
Staff member
VU Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
Mod Team Leader
Moved to bad.
This is a fucking hack job of a shitty propaganda piece.
Not one good study is mentioned and all interviewed are ANTZ.



"there are no data regarding the long-term cancer risk associated with low-level exposure to the detected carcinogens. Similar to cancer risk, there are no published data describing the long-term lung function or cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes."

They say it like it's a bad thing.



Here is the study the two ANTZ (Bradley Drummond and Donna Upson) quote:


http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-391FR#

annalsats.201311-391fr_f1.jpeg


If they used THIS ^^^ as their vaping device then no wonder they got shitty results.

Screenshot (7).png

Even with the shittiest gas station cigilike the could possibly find the results aren't even bad.

If you look on the right at "Average Ratio" that number is how many time LESS that chemical was found in the Ecig compared to a tobacco cigarette - 5150
 

VU Sponsors

Top