Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Bill Maher mocks Middle Americans as less 'affluent and educated,' saying 'they want to be us'
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainme...fluent-and-educated-saying-they-want-to-be-us
Yeah, right Bill. I grew up in and around Philly. I went to one of your vaunted Ivy League schools (University of Pennsylvania, where I met my wife). Neither of us could wait to get out of that shit-hole city. We did manage to escape it in the mid 1980s, but I only as far as the edge of the suburbs. As soon as we were able to afford it roughly 10 years ago, we bought property as far away from your wealthy blue paradise as was reasonably possible. Humans were not meant to live like ants.
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
n7a0yvnboei21.jpg
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So Rubio is trying to up the ante in his little Venezuelan Coup he is running by orchestrating FF poisoning of lawmakers to try to call for direct US involvement. Can't figure out why Trump has not shut down Rubio's little CIA coup there. Instead it looks like Trump is doing it. I guess it is better keeping them occupied by letting them orchestrate a Coup in Venezuela rather than one here at home.

Venezuelan Lawmaker Poisoned in Colombia Setting Up for Venezuela Live Aid Concert – His Assistant Is Killed
 
Last edited:

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
FUN FACTS: If the American electoral system went by popular votes (you know, the will of the people) vs. the electoral college, the last Republican President would have left office 25+ years ago.

Why shouldn't the candidate who more Americans vote for become President??
ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.....
AND BUILD A WALL AROUND THE IDIOTS IN THE RED STATES!!!


 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Sure I do. You wouldn't be acting like such a childish little piss-ant if you had. I am done tolerating your disrespect and lack of common courtesy.

Fuck You SPAMMER!!!
I asked you nicely many fucking times to leave my fucking thread alone but you’re such an ATTENTION WHORE , you can’t resist spreading conspiracy crap to satisfy your loneliness! Don’t talk about respect until you know how to spell it! IDIOT!!


 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Fuck You SPAMMER!!!
I asked you nicely many fucking times to leave my fucking thread alone but you’re such an ATTENTION WHORE , you can’t resist spreading conspiracy crap to satisfy your loneliness! Don’t talk about respect until you know how to spell it! IDIOT!!
:giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle:

I guess I keep forgetting your little safe space is just for you and Crommie to whine about the Bad Orange Man who is destroying your dreams of racial genocide to realize a pure Wakawakalanda land floating on the clouds of Socialism far above the rivers of blood of the evil white MAGA hat wearing racist Nazis & cow farts that live in your head 24-7 as programmed while you and Crommie post an endless string of nonsensical, illiterate, unintelligible, unattributed, baseless assertions and stroke each other off hoping today is the day Mueller will reveal the evidence of Russian Collusion that will give you the justification to begin your purge.

:xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD:
upload_2019-2-24_9-15-48.png
:xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD:

Run back to your safe space and clean Crommies ass after he shits the thread with the latest Trump Conspiracy The Dems, CNN, Colbert, Mahr & the Hollywood morons can dream up to control your mind & get out your 55gal drum of Butt Hurt Salve and apply liberally as you "console" each other. Your gonna have a bumpy ride from here on out as GEOTUS drains your SWAMP, proves Conspiracy Theories are real & lives in your dreams as Crommie & his ilk burn your house to the ground so you can be together forever.

:giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle:

WHO'S YOUR PRESIDENT?

carnivale.jpg
 
Last edited:

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
:giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle:

I guess I keep forgetting your little safe space is just for you and Crommie to whine about the Bad Orange Man who is destroying your dreams of racial genocide to realize a pure Wakawakalanda land floating on the clouds of Socialism far above the rivers of blood of the evil white MAGA hat wearing racist Nazis & cow farts that live in your head 24-7 as programmed while you and Crommie post an endless string of nonsensical, illiterate, unintelligible, unattributed, baseless assertions and stroke each other off hoping today is the day Mueller will reveal the evidence of Russian Collusion that will give you the justification to begin your purge.

:xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD:
View attachment 132425
:xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD::xD:

Run back to your safe space and clean Crommies ass after he shits the thread with the latest Trump Conspiracy The Dems, CNN, Colbert, Mahr & the Hollywood morons can dream up to control your mind & get out your 55gal drum of Butt Hurt Salve and apply liberally as you "console" each other. Your gonna have a bumpy ride from here on out as GEOTUS drains your SWAMP, proves Conspiracy Theories are real & lives in your dreams as Crommie & his ilk burn your house to the ground so you can be together forever.

:giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle:

WHO'S YOUR PRESIDENT?

carnivale.jpg

OK! ATTENTION WHORE....IM YOUR PRESIDENT you DUMB LONELY MOTHERFUCKER!


 

ej1024

VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
In this troubling week, this writer has seen a variety of disturbing news stories. Ok, that’s nothing new, we all know. But there are two that he would like to focus on today.

First, he saw an editorial saying that the U.S. must not abandon Afghanistan. He attempted to make some sense of this series of words, but while each is easily understood, when strung together, they lose all meaning. The U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and has been bombing and terrorizing that nation every day since then. What the U.S.’s goal there is one cannot say; the war is certainly, in the minds of many in the U.S., a forgotten war, although it is all too real for its Afghani victims. As of November, 2018, civilian deaths are conservatively estimated at 80,000. The infrastructure is destroyed, and the air quality has become one of the worst in the world. One would think that the people of Afghanistan would be desperate for the U.S. to ‘abandon’ their country.

With Venezuela currently big in the news, this writer saw a second article, another opinion piece, saying that U.S. President Donald Trump is right on Venezuela. Trump, in usual U.S. fashion, wants to ignore and thwart the will of the people, by declaring an opposition candidate as the legitimate leader of Venezuela. If the consequences were not so dire, this would be a laughable statement, coming from someone who can hardly be seen as the legitimate leader of the United States. There is an old adage that ‘majority rules’, but that doesn’t apply in the U.S. If it did, Trump would be back on his reality television show, where he belongs, and Hillary Clinton would be president of the United States (heaven help us all!).

Why does the U.S. government feel it needs to insert itself into every trouble spot in the world? Is it because of its sterling reputation in solving global problems? Is it because, wherever it chooses to intervene, after just a short time, the opposing forces in whatever nation it has ‘helped’ all join hands and sing Kumbaya around some giant campfire?

And as we consider these trouble spots, it’s certainly worthwhile to note that it is the U.S. that frequently causes these problems in the first place. Already it is being suspected that the U.S. is arming anti-government forces in Venezuela. In Afghanistan, it was the U.S. who armed and trained the Taliban when it was a rag-tag group opposing the Russians during that long and deadly war. When the Russians left, U.S. government officials seemed surprised and puzzled to learn that the people they supported against the Russians weren’t willing to hand over the government to some U.S. puppet. As a result, the U.S. is now engaged in Afghanistan in the longest war in its long and bloody history.

Where else has the U.S. caused untold suffering? Let’s consider Chile, where, under the rabid anti-Communist president, Richard Nixon, the U.S. government overthrew the democratically-elected government of Salvador Allende, and supported the seventeen-year long reign of terror of dictator General Augusto Pinochet.

We could look to Iraq, where the U.S., in the 1963, overthrew the government of Abdel Karim Kassem, and threw its support behind a young, anti-Communist leader named Saddam Hussein. In the decades between that first support and the overthrow of Hussein in 2003, the U.S. ranged from naming Iraq a state sponsor of terrorism, to supporting it with advanced weaponry when Iraq was at war with Iran.

And while we’re speaking of Iran, let’s take a quick look at the U.S.’s violent history there.

In 1953, the U.S. overthrew the democratically-elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and replaced him with the brutal Shah of Iran. Relations between the U.S. and Iran were quite cozy during this time, although the people of Iran suffered horribly. The Shah’s oppressive, barbaric reign ended when the people of Iran overthrew him, and installed a government of their own choosing. The U.S. government has never forgiven Iranians for daring to indulge in the luxury of self-determination, and as of this writing, continues to threaten Iran as it continues with cruel sanctions (illegal under international law, since they violate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)), and even threatening its closest allies with sanctions if they dare comply with the terms of the JCPOA.

Need we even mention Vietnam? Perhaps we should; there were many lessons to be learned from that imperial disaster that, if they had indeed been heeded, would have prevented much of the international suffering that has occurred since then. In the south, the U.S. first selected Bao Dai, who had a long record of collaboration with Vietnam’s previous colonial masters, the French and the Japanese. Later, the U.S. supported Ngo Dinh Diem, a repressive dictator, who provided many rights and privileges to the Catholics in that nation, but not so many to the vast number of Buddhists. Ho Chi Minh, who, despite his education and international travel, never lost his native identity, led Communist North Vietnam, and sought to reunite the nation. But the U.S. was determined that Vietnam not ‘fall’ to Communism, despite the wishes of the Vietnamese people. And so it launched its war, which killed at least 2,000,000 people, decimated the countryside, nearly destroyed the U.S. economy and tore the U.S. apart. Despite all that, the people of Vietnam were victorious.

And now we have the brilliant pundits and politicians telling us that the U.S. must not ‘abandon’ Afghanistan; rather, it should continue to destroy the country. Certainly there are many people left to be killed. And the U.S., we are also told, is right to support an opposition candidate over the democratically-elected one in Venezuela. Will the outcome of either of these disastrous mistakes be as successful as, say, the U.S. intervention in Iraq? Will they bring the same ‘benefits’ to either country that U.S. ‘help’ brought to the people of Chile?

For two centuries, the U.S. has run amok on the world stage, killing millions upon millions of innocent people, causing the torture of millions more, and destroying prospects, hopes and dreams for more people than can be counted. The world will be a more peaceful and just planet when the U.S. is eventually eclipsed in terms of military and the economy by any other nation. This cannot occur soon enough for the people of Afghanistan, Venezuela, and too many other nations to mention here.




 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
In this troubling week, this writer has seen a variety of disturbing news stories. Ok, that’s nothing new, we all know. But there are two that he would like to focus on today.

First, he saw an editorial saying that the U.S. must not abandon Afghanistan. He attempted to make some sense of this series of words, but while each is easily understood, when strung together, they lose all meaning. The U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and has been bombing and terrorizing that nation every day since then. What the U.S.’s goal there is one cannot say; the war is certainly, in the minds of many in the U.S., a forgotten war, although it is all too real for its Afghani victims. As of November, 2018, civilian deaths are conservatively estimated at 80,000. The infrastructure is destroyed, and the air quality has become one of the worst in the world. One would think that the people of Afghanistan would be desperate for the U.S. to ‘abandon’ their country.

With Venezuela currently big in the news, this writer saw a second article, another opinion piece, saying that U.S. President Donald Trump is right on Venezuela. Trump, in usual U.S. fashion, wants to ignore and thwart the will of the people, by declaring an opposition candidate as the legitimate leader of Venezuela. If the consequences were not so dire, this would be a laughable statement, coming from someone who can hardly be seen as the legitimate leader of the United States. There is an old adage that ‘majority rules’, but that doesn’t apply in the U.S. If it did, Trump would be back on his reality television show, where he belongs, and Hillary Clinton would be president of the United States (heaven help us all!).

Why does the U.S. government feel it needs to insert itself into every trouble spot in the world? Is it because of its sterling reputation in solving global problems? Is it because, wherever it chooses to intervene, after just a short time, the opposing forces in whatever nation it has ‘helped’ all join hands and sing Kumbaya around some giant campfire?

And as we consider these trouble spots, it’s certainly worthwhile to note that it is the U.S. that frequently causes these problems in the first place. Already it is being suspected that the U.S. is arming anti-government forces in Venezuela. In Afghanistan, it was the U.S. who armed and trained the Taliban when it was a rag-tag group opposing the Russians during that long and deadly war. When the Russians left, U.S. government officials seemed surprised and puzzled to learn that the people they supported against the Russians weren’t willing to hand over the government to some U.S. puppet. As a result, the U.S. is now engaged in Afghanistan in the longest war in its long and bloody history.

Where else has the U.S. caused untold suffering? Let’s consider Chile, where, under the rabid anti-Communist president, Richard Nixon, the U.S. government overthrew the democratically-elected government of Salvador Allende, and supported the seventeen-year long reign of terror of dictator General Augusto Pinochet.

We could look to Iraq, where the U.S., in the 1963, overthrew the government of Abdel Karim Kassem, and threw its support behind a young, anti-Communist leader named Saddam Hussein. In the decades between that first support and the overthrow of Hussein in 2003, the U.S. ranged from naming Iraq a state sponsor of terrorism, to supporting it with advanced weaponry when Iraq was at war with Iran.

And while we’re speaking of Iran, let’s take a quick look at the U.S.’s violent history there.

In 1953, the U.S. overthrew the democratically-elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and replaced him with the brutal Shah of Iran. Relations between the U.S. and Iran were quite cozy during this time, although the people of Iran suffered horribly. The Shah’s oppressive, barbaric reign ended when the people of Iran overthrew him, and installed a government of their own choosing. The U.S. government has never forgiven Iranians for daring to indulge in the luxury of self-determination, and as of this writing, continues to threaten Iran as it continues with cruel sanctions (illegal under international law, since they violate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)), and even threatening its closest allies with sanctions if they dare comply with the terms of the JCPOA.

Need we even mention Vietnam? Perhaps we should; there were many lessons to be learned from that imperial disaster that, if they had indeed been heeded, would have prevented much of the international suffering that has occurred since then. In the south, the U.S. first selected Bao Dai, who had a long record of collaboration with Vietnam’s previous colonial masters, the French and the Japanese. Later, the U.S. supported Ngo Dinh Diem, a repressive dictator, who provided many rights and privileges to the Catholics in that nation, but not so many to the vast number of Buddhists. Ho Chi Minh, who, despite his education and international travel, never lost his native identity, led Communist North Vietnam, and sought to reunite the nation. But the U.S. was determined that Vietnam not ‘fall’ to Communism, despite the wishes of the Vietnamese people. And so it launched its war, which killed at least 2,000,000 people, decimated the countryside, nearly destroyed the U.S. economy and tore the U.S. apart. Despite all that, the people of Vietnam were victorious.

And now we have the brilliant pundits and politicians telling us that the U.S. must not ‘abandon’ Afghanistan; rather, it should continue to destroy the country. Certainly there are many people left to be killed. And the U.S., we are also told, is right to support an opposition candidate over the democratically-elected one in Venezuela. Will the outcome of either of these disastrous mistakes be as successful as, say, the U.S. intervention in Iraq? Will they bring the same ‘benefits’ to either country that U.S. ‘help’ brought to the people of Chile?

For two centuries, the U.S. has run amok on the world stage, killing millions upon millions of innocent people, causing the torture of millions more, and destroying prospects, hopes and dreams for more people than can be counted. The world will be a more peaceful and just planet when the U.S. is eventually eclipsed in terms of military and the economy by any other nation. This cannot occur soon enough for the people of Afghanistan, Venezuela, and too many other nations to mention here.








commie manifesto.jpg
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
OK! ATTENTION WHORE....IM YOUR PRESIDENT you DUMB LONELY MOTHERFUCKER!
I'm not the asshole papering threads with articles I haven't read cutting & pasting the words without giving the original authors credit & linking back to the source because You lost a meme war w/ @chopdoc when he stepped up & ran toe to toe, meme for meme with you until you ran out of material because the left can't meme & started cutting & pasting excerpts from shit you didn't read ass wipe. You got BTFU!

Every meme, cartoon & article I post contains it's source in the link at the point of attachment that anyone can find. If I was the one seeking attention would I do that? You on the other hand seem to be taking credit for an author's work. All because you were pissed you were being ignored in your own thread as Pulse & I discussed Jussie Smollett & possible / probable connections to The Crafty Beaver & Bathroom Booker. We all know who the attention whore is.

Who's your President Ass Wipe?

d2al9zd5thi21.jpg
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
In this troubling week, this writer has seen a variety of disturbing news stories. Ok, that’s nothing new, we all know. But there are two that he would like to focus on today.

First, he saw an editorial saying that the U.S. must not abandon Afghanistan. He attempted to make some sense of this series of words, but while each is easily understood, when strung together, they lose all meaning. The U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and has been bombing and terrorizing that nation every day since then. What the U.S.’s goal there is one cannot say; the war is certainly, in the minds of many in the U.S., a forgotten war, although it is all too real for its Afghani victims. As of November, 2018, civilian deaths are conservatively estimated at 80,000. The infrastructure is destroyed, and the air quality has become one of the worst in the world. One would think that the people of Afghanistan would be desperate for the U.S. to ‘abandon’ their country.

With Venezuela currently big in the news, this writer saw a second article, another opinion piece, saying that U.S. President Donald Trump is right on Venezuela. Trump, in usual U.S. fashion, wants to ignore and thwart the will of the people, by declaring an opposition candidate as the legitimate leader of Venezuela. If the consequences were not so dire, this would be a laughable statement, coming from someone who can hardly be seen as the legitimate leader of the United States. There is an old adage that ‘majority rules’, but that doesn’t apply in the U.S. If it did, Trump would be back on his reality television show, where he belongs, and Hillary Clinton would be president of the United States (heaven help us all!).

Why does the U.S. government feel it needs to insert itself into every trouble spot in the world? Is it because of its sterling reputation in solving global problems? Is it because, wherever it chooses to intervene, after just a short time, the opposing forces in whatever nation it has ‘helped’ all join hands and sing Kumbaya around some giant campfire?

And as we consider these trouble spots, it’s certainly worthwhile to note that it is the U.S. that frequently causes these problems in the first place. Already it is being suspected that the U.S. is arming anti-government forces in Venezuela. In Afghanistan, it was the U.S. who armed and trained the Taliban when it was a rag-tag group opposing the Russians during that long and deadly war. When the Russians left, U.S. government officials seemed surprised and puzzled to learn that the people they supported against the Russians weren’t willing to hand over the government to some U.S. puppet. As a result, the U.S. is now engaged in Afghanistan in the longest war in its long and bloody history.

Where else has the U.S. caused untold suffering? Let’s consider Chile, where, under the rabid anti-Communist president, Richard Nixon, the U.S. government overthrew the democratically-elected government of Salvador Allende, and supported the seventeen-year long reign of terror of dictator General Augusto Pinochet.

We could look to Iraq, where the U.S., in the 1963, overthrew the government of Abdel Karim Kassem, and threw its support behind a young, anti-Communist leader named Saddam Hussein. In the decades between that first support and the overthrow of Hussein in 2003, the U.S. ranged from naming Iraq a state sponsor of terrorism, to supporting it with advanced weaponry when Iraq was at war with Iran.

And while we’re speaking of Iran, let’s take a quick look at the U.S.’s violent history there.

In 1953, the U.S. overthrew the democratically-elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and replaced him with the brutal Shah of Iran. Relations between the U.S. and Iran were quite cozy during this time, although the people of Iran suffered horribly. The Shah’s oppressive, barbaric reign ended when the people of Iran overthrew him, and installed a government of their own choosing. The U.S. government has never forgiven Iranians for daring to indulge in the luxury of self-determination, and as of this writing, continues to threaten Iran as it continues with cruel sanctions (illegal under international law, since they violate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)), and even threatening its closest allies with sanctions if they dare comply with the terms of the JCPOA.

Need we even mention Vietnam? Perhaps we should; there were many lessons to be learned from that imperial disaster that, if they had indeed been heeded, would have prevented much of the international suffering that has occurred since then. In the south, the U.S. first selected Bao Dai, who had a long record of collaboration with Vietnam’s previous colonial masters, the French and the Japanese. Later, the U.S. supported Ngo Dinh Diem, a repressive dictator, who provided many rights and privileges to the Catholics in that nation, but not so many to the vast number of Buddhists. Ho Chi Minh, who, despite his education and international travel, never lost his native identity, led Communist North Vietnam, and sought to reunite the nation. But the U.S. was determined that Vietnam not ‘fall’ to Communism, despite the wishes of the Vietnamese people. And so it launched its war, which killed at least 2,000,000 people, decimated the countryside, nearly destroyed the U.S. economy and tore the U.S. apart. Despite all that, the people of Vietnam were victorious.

And now we have the brilliant pundits and politicians telling us that the U.S. must not ‘abandon’ Afghanistan; rather, it should continue to destroy the country. Certainly there are many people left to be killed. And the U.S., we are also told, is right to support an opposition candidate over the democratically-elected one in Venezuela. Will the outcome of either of these disastrous mistakes be as successful as, say, the U.S. intervention in Iraq? Will they bring the same ‘benefits’ to either country that U.S. ‘help’ brought to the people of Chile?

For two centuries, the U.S. has run amok on the world stage, killing millions upon millions of innocent people, causing the torture of millions more, and destroying prospects, hopes and dreams for more people than can be counted. The world will be a more peaceful and just planet when the U.S. is eventually eclipsed in terms of military and the economy by any other nation. This cannot occur soon enough for the people of Afghanistan, Venezuela, and too many other nations to mention here.
Strange those trucks that your article states were filled with weapons Trump was arming the rebels with didn't blow up when they were burned at the border to keep the food from getting to the starving subjects of socialism in Venezuela. Did it ever occur to you you are cutting & pasting words from an article trying to blame your president for their own actions as socialism fails on it's own because a socialist dictator stole an election?

I guess you would have to read what you clipped & understand it in order to ask yourself the question.


Venezuelans Now Regret Giving Up Their Guns – This is What Happens to a Disarmed Populace
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2...4PxxAAuvBo8r_2RlX_DC7z_Oll8Ob0zn6zsQPHuU0o5hw
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm not the asshole papering threads with articles I haven't read cutting & pasting the words without giving the original authors credit & linking back to the source because You lost a meme war w/ @chopdoc when he stepped up & ran toe to toe, meme for meme with you until you ran out of material because the left can't meme & started cutting & pasting excerpts from shit you didn't read ass wipe. You got BTFU!

Every meme, cartoon & article I post contains it's source in the link at the point of attachment that anyone can find. If I was the one seeking attention would I do that? You on the other hand seem to be taking credit for an author's work. All because you were pissed you were being ignored in your own thread as Pulse & I discussed Jussie Smollett & possible / probable connections to The Crafty Beaver & Bathroom Booker. We all know who the attention whore is.

Who's your President Ass Wipe?

d2al9zd5thi21.jpg
ignore the stupid cunt.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
An Anon is asking: So does it not seem odd that a Cabal News Anchor who did such a bang up job shaping the Narrative in reporting on multiple False Flags such as Thousand Oaks & The California Wildfires to be treated with such indignity in recent & extremely graphic reporting of the nature of his death. Was he throwing caution to the wind and actually doing real reporting in investigating leads & exposing those behind these events or investigating the wrong people in upcoming bombshell stories? Was he possibly talking to authorities about his role in these events or others?

KTLA Anchor Chris Burrous Died from Overdose on Crystal **** During Wild Tryst
https://theblast.com/ktla-anchor-chris-burrous-died-overdose-crystal-****-anus/

Anchor Chris Burrous Died From ‘**** Toxicity’ After Inserting Drug In His Anus
Autopsy reveals disturbing details about his overdose in seedy hotel room.
https://radaronline.com/exclusives/...y-****-toxicity-inserting-drug-anus-overdose/

This recent reporting seems more like he is being made into an example to others of what can happen if they decide to do honest reporting on certain individuals or decide to cooperate with authorities. Something seems real odd about this when there are more discreet ways of handling the subject for a loyal servant.
 
Last edited:

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Forget if I posted with all the paperhanging going on here

AOC's Latest Nanny-State Proclamation: Americans Must "Eat Fewer Hamburgers" To Stop Climate Change

"It’s not to say we’re gonna force everybody to go vegan or anything crazy like that." But it’s to say, "Listen, we gotta address factory farming. Maybe we shouldn’t be eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch, and dinner."
She's right you know; eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch, and dinner is just plain wrong.
  • Bacon for breakfast.
  • A cheeseburger for lunch.
  • Steak for dinner.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Yeah this asshole is definitely up to his neck in pulling the strings in the Situation in Venezuela just as he is up to his neck in censoring conservatives on the internet through the Atlantic Council

Marco Rubio Tweets Thinly-Veiled Death Threat At Venezuela's Maduro

The esteemed senator from Florida is calling for the anal rape and murder of Maduro.



Maduro's Days "Numbered" Pompeo Warns; Guaido To "Formally" Request US "Liberation"

Opposition leader seeks outside help for "the liberation of our homeland"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top