Become a Patron!

Did Cali just do an "about-face" on the TobaccoFreeCA "StillBlowingSmoke" campaign?

MikeSully

Bronze Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Member For 2 Years
I am not totally sure what to make of this switch yet..... Feeling the heat on their bad stewardship of $75 million public dollars to keep people smoking?

From their facebook page yesterday....


"Yes! The research and studies have all signs pointing to e-cigarettes being less harmful than traditional cigarettes.

Traditional cigarettes are burned, or are “combustible”. That means tar, carbon monoxide, and other chemicals associated with burning are inhaled. These are highly toxic to the body. There are approximately 600 ingredients in cigarettes. When burned, they create more than 7,000 chemicals. At least 69 of these chemicals are known to cause cancer, and many are poisonous. (http://www.lung.org/stop-smoking/about-smoking/facts-figures/whats-in-a-cigarette.html). We have never seen traditional cigarettes produce a positive health effect on our bodies, which is why traditional cigarettes are the #1 cause of preventable death in the US and quitting is the quickest path to achieving optimal health (http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/).

Switching completely from traditional cigarettes to only e-cigarettes, a person will inhale fewer toxic chemicals to get the same dose of nicotine. And we think that’s a really good thing! Many of you have commented how much better you feel already from switching from traditional cigarettes to e-cigarettes. Of course you do - you’re not inhaling 7,000 chemicals in your body!

All of this is good news. And to many of you, it’s old news. Those in the cessation treatment profession would agree, quitting traditional tobacco is a process. It is a personal journey that people pursue differently and use different quitting methods. (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes-prevention/risk/tobacco/withdrawal-fact-sheet).

So yes, studies suggest e-cigarettes are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, but that doesn’t make them “safe”. "
 

Sully

Silver Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
Member For 5 Years
Hey Brother! Great to see some positive! My question, is Tobacco Free CA part of the California Dept of Public Health? Specifically, CDPH is the one waging war on vapor! I'd be curious to understand the connection between the two. Thanks for posting! :)
 

MikeSully

Bronze Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Member For 2 Years
Im not sure if they are one and the same but the tobaccofreeca facebook and website touts the stillblowingsmoke and cpdh openly and often. Makes me think they're directly connected if not the same. i did wonder the same thing though. I cant help but wait for tomorrows post to start with the word "BUT....". Let's hope not.
 

5150sick

Under Ground Hustler
Staff member
VU Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
Mod Team Leader
Yes the Tobacco Free CA is part of the California Dept of Public Health.

They are funded by your tax dollars and the 1998 master settlement agreement.

Cali is one of the states that decided it was smart to take a lump sum of money up front instead of just getting huge payments from Big Tobacco from 1998 until 2025.

They blew 100% of the money selling high risk tobacco bonds.

The Greedy politicians of California chose this for their future. *I guess they figured "Hey it's 1998 I won't be around to get fucked in 15 years"



Find out how bad your state fucked you over here:
(Notice the ones at the top which are "most fucked" are the same ones that are anti-vaping. Vaping converted Smokers do not help the repay high risk bonds)


http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/tbcbonds-statemap
 

VU Sponsors

Top