I missed your questions earlier, being so annoyed by illiterate respondents...
Wow, thanks for the compliment to those of us who misread your horrendously-phrased survey.
I understand you're frustrated, especially since quite a few of us are, IMHO, needlessly paranoid when it comes to anyone purporting to be conducting research of any kind on vaping. It's a tough crowd, I get it - I'm surprised they haven't formed a lynch mob to come after me because I'm a member of the media, which is the only branch of society to many here that's scarier or more detested than academia.
But I've got to interject for a second here on your insinuations that because your language was misleading at best, all the rest of us are stupid. I use words to make a living - people pay me to write thousands of them every week, and have done so for years. I think this qualifies me as an individual generally qualified to read a simple document.
Now, I don't want to come across as thinking I'm perfect or anything - I'm not. I make mistakes, sometimes regrettably stupid little ones on a daily basis. Thankfully I have editors, who are people who help make my writing better before I put it into print. If you don't have access to one, maybe you could ask a friend or fellow student to read what you're writing to see if it makes sense before unleashing it on the world.
But again, I make mistakes. I understand other people make them too. I'll often skim over minor ones without even realizing it when I'm trying not to miss the forest for the trees, so to speak. When you write an entire survey treating smoking as if it's a presently ongoing activity, but preface it with a tiny, vague blurb in an easily-overlooked header mentioning "prior" use (I'm honestly not even sure if it was there before or if you went back in to edit after getting called out), I'm going to assume that you made one mistake and wrote the rest of the page correctly.
If I'm gauging your criticism of the rest of us properly, it seems you think we should have assumed that the first sentence was the only one in your survey worded correctly, and everything else on the page was just one giant fuck-up. I'd have preferred to think that a university student would've been capable of getting at least the majority of their point across in a comprehensible form, but it appears I gave you far too much credit.
That said, I see you've gone in and heavily edited your original survey. I went ahead and completed it, though most of the questions seemed somewhat vague and difficult to place in relation to e-cig use. I hope it helps you out with whatever you're trying to accomplish.