AC & DC are so much the same but different. Two amps A/C will kill a person. Yet D/C is safe. (to a point). Westinghouse & Edison & Tesla really went at it. Ask a kid where power comes from, I bet they say the wall.
Yes, sort of. No. Sort of. Yes, it takes less AC current than DC current to kill a person, but there are other factors that determine. If the path is directly through the heart, it only takes a 30 mA AC, and about 1/2 A DC. (
http://www.brighthubengineering.com/power-plants/89792-ac-and-dc-shock-comparison/ ). But, anyone who has ever been shocked will tell you, DC is more painful. It burns (think lightning strike).
In the War of the Currents, Edison played up the fact that it takes less current AC to be lethal than DC. Where he fell short in his argument is that the current required to supply a desired voltage any distance became exponentially higher the further you were transmitting it. The advantage AC provided was that the voltage could be stepped up thousands of times higher than needed and stepped down to the desire voltage at the destination. As a result, AC current would be severe magnitudes lower than DC for any significant distance. So AC is relatively safer. (And poses a lower fire risk)
Westinghouse was mainly a locomotive guy, but brought Tesla on when he branched into electrical. The easy thing to remember about any debate about Tesla vs. Anybody...Tesla was right. Marconi was a thief. Edison was a first class asshole.
Sorry if I derail the thread. All things electrical have always been a bit of a passion for me...and yes, Tesla is one person that I have always admired.