Ok..so some ARE using exact representation with characters used and all...Those i can and will agree should be put to rest and indeed are copyright infringement...My argument was based on the bottles shown at the beginning of this thread and used as the example.
Take away the duplicate/Copy character and art work and its enough to not be ruled infringement. This what ive been going on about..The Name Captain Krunch (as spelled) is not copyrighted.. The colors and even the pic of the cereal (as long as its not a copy of an original print) are not infringement either.
Some went to far and i agree should be put to rest but others not so much.. Its marketing strategy representing what may interest vapors alike, otherwise we dont know what were buying.. Similarity is not infringement within guidelines which some have not crossed.
Ill just wait for an outcome of a court ruling or the people who cant afford to fight it give up or, fight to see what happens.
Take away the duplicate/Copy character and art work and its enough to not be ruled infringement. This what ive been going on about..The Name Captain Krunch (as spelled) is not copyrighted.. The colors and even the pic of the cereal (as long as its not a copy of an original print) are not infringement either.
Some went to far and i agree should be put to rest but others not so much.. Its marketing strategy representing what may interest vapors alike, otherwise we dont know what were buying.. Similarity is not infringement within guidelines which some have not crossed.
Ill just wait for an outcome of a court ruling or the people who cant afford to fight it give up or, fight to see what happens.