the problem is as a fellow reviewer (well actually 3 of us in the convo because
@Deucesjack does reviews as well) The most important thing we can do is inform correctly. If we spout out nonsense that everyone knows is wrong you lose credibility and without credibility why would anyone watch a review? I surely wouldn't watch any reviews from someone who isn't credible.
It's fine for you to like sigelei and it's fine for you to say they last a long time. because they do, they are well built for sure. But the chips performance is very bad. I personally tested and reviewed the fuchai 213 plus and it performs like ass. There is no other way to say it. The numbers don't lie and they are also facts and not opinions. it's factual that the 213 performs poorly at high watts and in temp control mode. it's not open for debate, it's not an opinion. it's factual. I spent hours testing it and then recording my video to inform people as such. so for someone to come in who clearly hasn't done the proper testing to call me wrong just makes you sound really uninformed. And the worst part is because as a fellow reviewer, there is always the possibility we make a mistake. we are human after all. But we have to be able to learn from our mistakes. we owe it to our subscribers to be honest and reliable. If we make a mistake own it and learn from it. I'm more then willing to myself to make sure I provide the most accurate data. You are factually wrong in the scenario and the fact you defend it instead of listening and learning leads me to believe you are not a reliable reviewer. So after this thread my question is how can you expect people to take you seriously when you are saying a mod is great that most of the members here know already isn't?