Welll... Speaking from a strictly theoretical perspective (strong background in electricity, electrical engineering and software design, and a touch of physics)...
Just was VW yielded an improvement over VV because the driver could dynamically adjust for coil changes in terms of power expended, TC can, theoretically, yield even more consistent results, because the goal is a consistent amount of energy applied to the wick in terms of heat (energy).
Whether designers and manufacturers successfully execute is another question. As is whether the difference between VW and TC is appreciable. It may not be.
Jim
Yes, that is the goal, and a good one to me. Besides the obvious felt comfort of controlling temp, it is also useful in limiting damaging temps to juice, flavor, or equipment. Simply allowing the heating circuit to do what it can, TC is just another step to give the vape you want.
On the physics side.... The heating system is simple. Energy input in the form of watts is the driver. Taking any limitations of the wick out of the equation, 100w will change "X" quantity of liquid to gas at a given temp and pressure. All that matters is the boiling point of the liquid. In a closed system, all heat input would go to changing state, not temp. But we don't have a closed system.
Given all involved, the ideal would be to add as much heat to produce all the vapor you want at boiling temp. Boiling point alone is much to hot to breath, but not with all the air included. So a bit more heat to warm that for comfort. That would be ideal and TC gives the best opportunity to control that.
Hopefully others may have an answer...