Become a Patron!
Vero dna200
- Thread starter Mroutlaw
- Start date
I didn't but I was looking at this one. http://www.eciggity.com/reuleaux-by-jaybo-design-wismec/
At first look I thought it was cute now when I see it.. I think of a High performance pleasuring device for the Genitalia..
Its bulky exactly the direction I am trying to move away from..
You have exotic taste for your genitalia pleasuring devices lolAt first look I thought it was cute now when I see it.. I think of a High performance pleasuring device for the Genitalia..
Its bulky exactly the direction I am trying to move away from..
Yes it is bulky. Hard to get 3 18650's in a device without some type of bulk.
Its cool though but I will wait
I hear ya on that. I try not to be an early adopter beta tester in general. I have been in the past, but for mainstream vape gear it doesn't hurt to wait and see.
f1r3b1rd
https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
That jaybo/wismec is the first dna200 other than the shark that I actually like for its appearance. Supposedly its about tue same form factor as the boxer just a tad "girthier."
It has me seriously considering canceling the cloudmaker
It has me seriously considering canceling the cloudmaker
Hmmm I want it and dont. Jesus Christ man! stop making me want to buy shit you cost me mucho monies this week @f1r3b1rd
f1r3b1rd
https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
You know you don't need any influence
f1r3b1rd
https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
Well that went to the dark side
Lmao
No one seems to have answered your question. I'm wondering if it has something to do with Busardo's review of DNA200 mods. They even have a picture of him on the link to the Vero.
Short and sweet, the mod ranked towards the bottom (or maybe at the bottom, can't remember) with some discussion that the location of the fire button was almost impossible to use comfortably.
You actually listen to what he says?
If you want to know the intricate details of a device, Busardo is the best reviewer out there. He will break down the device and tell you every specification of it with extensive testing. I know his videos are long, but they are generally on point. I've been vaping for over 5 years, and when I started , he was one of the very few out there who was honest. Too many of the big reviewers out there now sugar coat the devices, probably because they are afraid that they won't get them for free.
I watch a lot of the bigger guys for basic details about a device, but when I want to know specification, its busardo who I turn to. He will tell you the honest truth. Take the hcigar vt200. I've seen about 5 major reviewers feature that mod, and Busardo was the only one to mention that the battery in is doesn't seem to actually be 1300mah. Thats something I want to know. My next choice would be vapefagan. At least he takes apart the mods and looks to see how something is built
f1r3b1rd
https://cookingwithlegs.com/
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
VU Challenge Team
Member For 5 Years
VU Patreon
Like any reviewer busardo is wrong at times...
None of them are infallible.
Busardo also had a poor understanding of tc mod's up until he had some time with the sxmini m. I emailed with him a few times about certain atomizers that are notoriously bad matches for tc-his favorite being one of them-the kf4.
Point is taking any one reviewer as gospel is never a good idea, and taking any of them too seriously is equally bad.
Now, as to his honesty, well, numbers don't lie, and he may be honest, but he is also very biased on some things.
Take his review of the erlkoenigin, he couldn't get the wicking right so it sucked, or the billow2, he didn't use the inner chamber, so it sucked(a little birdie emailed him so he went back on that one) but those are just two examples of why I only watch him for the numbers and take his OPINION with a grain pf salt.
None of them are infallible.
Busardo also had a poor understanding of tc mod's up until he had some time with the sxmini m. I emailed with him a few times about certain atomizers that are notoriously bad matches for tc-his favorite being one of them-the kf4.
Point is taking any one reviewer as gospel is never a good idea, and taking any of them too seriously is equally bad.
Now, as to his honesty, well, numbers don't lie, and he may be honest, but he is also very biased on some things.
Take his review of the erlkoenigin, he couldn't get the wicking right so it sucked, or the billow2, he didn't use the inner chamber, so it sucked(a little birdie emailed him so he went back on that one) but those are just two examples of why I only watch him for the numbers and take his OPINION with a grain pf salt.
I absolutely agree. When I say he's honest, I'm talking about on the technical side. I've seen him review tanks, the lemo as one example and he said it leaked, but he was filling it wrong. A lot of reviewers just get up there and say this is awesome and it works well.
Generally, I don't don't make my decision based on people's opinion. I watch them to see what the device offers and if it's a mod, the technical aspects of it then make my decision. IMHO opinions are too subjective, especially in vaping. Take Rip Trippers or Twisted360. Kinda hard to listen to their opinion on how well a tank produces flavor or taste when I vape at about half the wattage they do.
I agree wholeheartedly. I cited him in my previous post because it was pure information and not opinion. Either the mod maker fills in the necessary fields, they're blank, or maybe contain Evolv's presets. Not much opinion there.
You cited specific instances and I accept every one. It's good information to know - simply more tools to use in applying the filters we all need to use.
