*sigh* It's time to write a book, as EJ would call it.
Again, I know what your theory is and where it came from. I don't have a problem with the globalist agenda part. That's been around for many years. Now-a-days, it's called things like "the banker wars" "the banker elite", "shadow government" and what not. All wars are banker wars is a common catch phrase on zerohedge. But it used to be called "The New World Order", "Agenda 21" and other things. These are all the same thing, with different names. Globalisation. I prefer the word globalisation. It's simpler and broad enough to encompass all the other names. Globalisation is real. It's openly talked about now.
Globalisation has been around most of my life. The major policy changes over the years have centered around it. "Free trade" agreements. Immigration. I remember the the discussions from the 80's and 90's about such things and the political elite talking about helping third world countries become more modern and efficient. The talk was about their "standard of living". I distinctly remember discussing this, long before the internet existed in any meaningful way, and coming to the conclusion that in order for poor countries standard of living to be on par with ours, not only would poor countries standard of living would have to go up, ours would have to go down.That has happened.
Globalism has been on a slow roll for most, if not all, of my life. The issues have been piecemeal. Free Trade, Immigration, Foriegn aid, and of course the latest issue that must be "fixed" to stay on the road of globalism is global warming. Non of this is new. There may be new names for the conspiracy, but the goal is the same.
What I don't agree with you about is the "they" want violence part. All evidence to the contrary. They do not want the violence, the violence is a product of the people no longer accepting the globalist agenda. The agenda that has been playing out for many years is now coming to roost with the consequences of that agenda. The US's high standard of living is going down, as it was supposed to. People are feeling the loss of freedoms. Most people think they have a problem with a specific problem like immigration that pisses them off but it's the entirety of globalisation that is their problem. The trend towards globalisation was bound to fail and it was and is bound to lead to bloodshed. We are not seeing a plan by the elite to have violence, we are seeing the results of a lifetime agenda of globalisation that is failing. The elite does not want it. It means they failed. We can see this in other first world countries also. The easiest example is brexit.
As globalisation fails, there will be a power vacuum. Power vacuums always lead to violence. What you see as a planned elite agenda, the violence, I see as a failed or failing globalist agenda. "They" wanted to sneak globalism by us, not try to force it. Of course they will fight the failure of their agenda, but they are just trying to hold on. Nationalism is setting in, in every country. The anti-globalism.