Do really think this is targeted at american corruption? I think its more to go after russian, turkish and china money in the country.
dead men tell no tales.....wtf is going on.Las Vegas Police Captain Suddenly Goes Missing
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-suddenly-goes-missing-considered-endangered/
From a list of CEOs announcing they are stepping down or being replaced that was in CBTS.Schmidt... Peribere... Why are these significant Pat?
and what is CBTS...From a list of CEOs announcing they are stepping down or being replaced that was in CBTS.
That thing I PM a group of you about a few timesand what is CBTS...
and why do you think they are stepping down....satanic globalsit pedo ring...threatened with exposure?You are right though I should have just posted the list
View attachment 99195
View attachment 99193View attachment 99194
Speculation not confirmation at this point, but you are on the right wave but it is possible there is a range of frequencies.and why do you think they are stepping down....satanic globalsit pedo ring...threatened with exposure?
as someone who does not take that much of an interest in the comings and goings of CEOs I'm not sure I would know if there has been a rash of CEOs resigning......there does seem to be a rash of political elite retiring or resigning though.Speculation not confirmation at this point, but you are on the right range but it is possible there is a range of frequencies.
There was a demand to Q that there be more transparency in draining swamp. In Response Q pointed out Eric Smidt CEO of Google was stepping down asked if coincidence and asked if anyone noticed any others recently stepping down.
This is list the anons are researching & throwing together for confirmation by Q which will confirm them by numbers who was leaving in a less than normal manner. There are innocents in it I'm sure as plug for swamp was only pulled not all that long ago. Nature of offenses are unknown & doubt there will be a distinction of that in the confirmation when & if it happens.
Does seem to curiously be a recent rash of CEOs running for cover though & I for one do not believe this is a coincidence.
You will never convince me the establishment didn't cheat in Alabama. Can't believe Trump would ever let it pass by unchallenged.
Yeah it is amazing how you never hear a peep out of them again after the day after the election. It was such obvious bullshit. No way it swayed the outcome - If anything that whole thing gave Roy more votes in Alabama. Not a doubt in my mind it backfired on Jones.They did cheat, but it was very much out in the open.
Have you heard any more about sexual assault? No, because it doesn't matter anymore. Mission accomplished.
I'm still a little fuzzy on what this means and why it's significant.Distilled list of CEOs
Q drops info in cryptic future incomplete format that you understand later. He is one saying to research the ceos & confirmed that list & told CBTS to keep it updated as more fall. They have not publicly played out but there are numerous confirmation signs that have occurred that it is quite probably genuine (sealed Federal Indictments, Ankle Monitors/Boots, cryptic confirmations in Trump Tweets & hidden messages in his speeches)I'm still a little fuzzy on what this means and why it's significant.
Also, a couple days ago, this Q fella(?) posted that 'assets in this country had been seized in the early am hours, pursuant to the EO.
But if that were true... by now, at least some news sites would have reported it.
It would be huuge news if Trump had really seized any foreign owned assets. NO possible way that could be kept quiet.
I'm dyin to see these as credible but so far (in my few weeks Pat experience w/ chan)
the ones I've read and remember have not panned out to be true from what I've seen....
I wanna believe!!!
Your right..... the scandal did give Moore SOME votes..... Is WHY He only last by the small margin he did.. Fact Is Jones gained more than Moore.... and Moore lost more vote than Jones. .. scandal swung the vote by about 5 points..... MOORE was a bad candidate and was very close too loosing without the allegations.Yeah it is amazing how you never hear a peep out of them again after the day after the election. It was such obvious bullshit. No way it swayed the outcome - If anything that whole thing gave Roy more votes in Alabama. Not a doubt in my mind it backfired on Jones.
They resorted to outright fraud to steal it. Now we just need to prove it and no in in Alabama seems to be calling for a recount.
I don't think it was that tight at all. I think Moore had a very comfortable 10% margin going in and probably picked up at least another 3% - 8% over that from the scandal.Your right..... the scandal did give Moore SOME votes..... Is WHY He only last by the small margin he did.. Fact Is Jones gained more than Moore.... and Moore lost more vote than Jones. .. scandal swung the vote by about 5 points..... MOORE was a bad candidate and was very close too loosing without the allegations.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk