To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

[pulsevape]

So you believe it's impossible for a panel of lawmakers, (whether they're Democrats, Trump brand Republicans, whoever you prefer) to come up (with the help from professional psychiatrists) with an objective standard of "deranged" and "dangerous" that doesn't simply become an excuse to disarm one's political rivals? Now who is being pessimistic?

As Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote...nobody in the USSR ever went to Siberia for political dissent...they were picked up interigated and were deemed a threat to the public, they were all declared mentally unstable...by a panel of psychatrists with degrees summa cum laudde and the whole nine yards. What I believe is you are purposely ignoring the reality we are facing, Today in America the DNC and the American liberals are openly calling for the end of free speech...the reality we are facing is there are many many liberal politicans who would have no problem declaring you unfit to own a firearm if say .....you read the wrong books, watched the wrong youtube channel if you
didn't support abortion
or gay marriage
trans rights
affermative action
if you thought Nelson Mandela was a POS
if you prayed to a Christian God
if you owned a Confederate flag
if you donated money to the Mormon Church
if you home schooled your kids
if you didn't want your kids inoculated
if you thought there was a globalist conspiracy to destroy the nation states
if you thought the SPLC was a terrorist orginization
if you found it odd how many Jews were on the Federal Reserve Board
if you wanted little blond babbies
if you thought White Privledge was total horseshit
if you thought free speech was a good idea
if you were a military Veteran ...ect.

 

[Steve-M]

What I believe is you are purposely ignoring the reality we are facing, Today in America the DNC and the American liberals are openly calling for the end of free speech...the reality we are facing is there are many many liberal politicans who would have no problem declaring you unfit to own a firearm if say ......

I’m ignoring it because it isn’t central to the question of whether certain people should be barred from owning firearms. If it makes you happy, yes, I acknowledge that the left is getting ever more unhinged, and that if the right loses its spine, they can use gun control laws against us. But that doesn’t make laws barring violent felons, **** and ****** addicts, and severely mentally handicapped/ill inherently bad. It just means that we must remain vigilant, because that’s the price of freedom.

 

[Time]

Not particularly, but unless God sends a few angels down to rule over us, judges and licensed psychiatrists are all we've got.


Hard and fast rules tend to have their own drawbacks, i.e. no flexibility to deal with the wide variety of situations the real world presents on a case by case basis. Hefty mandatory minimum sentences for relatively minor drug offenses being an example.

You can't even get shrinks to agree who is legally insane and who is not in a murder trial. The Prosecutor will have an "expert witness", a shrink, that says the defendant is not legally insane and the Defense will have one that says he is. And that's a criminal trial. But you want me to concede that they can come to a reasonable decision for a person that is not even charged with a crime? It's not okay for a person to be wrongfully convicted of a crime and lose his/her rights but it IS okay for that same system to remove the rights of a person that was not even charged with a crime? Dude. Come on now............................

 

[Time]

It just means that we must remain vigilant, because that’s the price of freedom.

Stripping people of their rights, because you are afraid of them, is the opposite of freedom. At least,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,for them.

 

[SteveS45]

I try to limit my responses to this thread but I own many firearms that are Legally Registered with the Federal government and they will have to pry them from my cold dead hands to say I do not have the right to own and possess them. A couple of thousand rounds of ammo to back up my statement.

 

[Steve-M]

You can't even get shrinks to agree who is legally insane and who is not in a murder trial.

Apples and oranges. I'm talking about individuals who have been committed to a mental health institution, and/or diagnosed with a severe mental illness/handicap, not in some devious effort to deny those individuals their rights, but to treat them. In that case, it's not about whose got the best/most experts, but what the records state.

Stripping people of their rights, because you are afraid of them, is the opposite of freedom. At least,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,for them.

It's not a matter of being afraid. It's a matter of understanding that firearms ownership is inextricably tied with a certain level of responsibility. To put it another way, I don't fear my 6 year old son, but he's far from having the maturity required to own a firearm. An adult with the mental capacity of a 6 year old, as determined by a number of psychiatrists / psychologists over his medical history, is no different.

 

[pulsevape]

I’m ignoring it because it isn’t central to the question of whether certain people should be barred from owning firearms. If it makes you happy, yes, I acknowledge that the left is getting ever more unhinged, and that if the right loses its spine, they can use gun control laws against us. But that doesn’t make laws barring violent felons, **** and ****** addicts, and severely mentally handicapped/ill inherently bad. It just means that we must remain vigilant, because that’s the price of freedom.

well those of us who would be put in camps or have our guns taken from us DO find it Central to the question......

 

[Tpat591]

I try to limit my responses to this thread but I own many firearms that are Legally Registered with the Federal government and they will have to pry them from my cold dead hands to say I do not have the right to own and possess them. A couple of thousand rounds of ammo to back up my statement.

And there are people (Psychiatrists) who would gladly testify by the very threatening nature of your statement you are mentally unfit to own those firearms and many more who would gladly lie and say you personally threatened them your weapons must be confiscated for the good of society - to protect the children...

I'm not saying that....But that is where this line of thought inevitably leads...Especially when one examines the all out social media censorship assault currently underway in America & around the globe. David Hogg's hitler youth got half the conservative media's youtube accounts suspended in a deliberate media censorship campaign shortly after Parkland when he didn't like that he wasn't winning the hearts and minds of the people.

 

[Steve-M]

well those of us who would be put in camps or have our guns taken from us DO find it Central to the question......

Yeah, I can't say I'm too worried about getting put into a camp, but maybe I'm just being optimistic. In any case, this discussion is the first I'm hearing of people saying that people with a diagnosed history of paranoid schizophrenics, mental retardation, etc. should have full gun ownership rights. That goes against the positions of most gun rights orgs that I've seen including...

the NRA:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms

Since 1966, the National Rifle Association has urged the federal government to address the problem of mental illness and violence. As we noted then, “the time is at hand to seek means by which society can identify, treat and temporarily isolate such individuals,” because “elimination of the instrument by which these crimes are committed cannot arrest the ravages of a psychotic murderer.”[1]

More recently, the NRA has supported legislation to ensure that appropriate records of those who have been judged mentally incompetent or involuntarily committed to mental institutions be made available for use in firearms transfer background checks. The NRA will support any reasonable step to fix America’s broken mental health system without intruding on the constitutional rights of Americans.

The GOA:
https://www.gunowners.org/red-flag-hearing-texas-senate.htm

Talking Points

Red Flag proposal: this would allow family members and others to file a petition seeking removal of firearms from a person they believe is potentially dangerous.

*The Red Flag proposal is dangerous because it forces people into court of law without any probable cause of a crime having been committed.
*Our justice system is supposed to prosecute and punish people who have broken an actual law, not those who are thought to be likely to commit a crime in the future. Wading into predictive judicial action is very dangerous.
*Any hampering of the ability to keep and bear arms should only come through a criminal conviction or a professional diagnoses of a mental illness. Any other hindrance or barrier can be abused or misapplied.
*A vengeful relative who dislikes guns could report someone’s gun ownership with a personal opinion that they are unfit to own guns.
*This would set a dangerous precedent for lowering thresholds for stripping people of other Constitutional rights.

and the Second Amendment Foundation:
https://www.saf.org/gun-rights-faq/

We believe that the Second Amendment right to self-protection and defense of liberty should be granted to all those eligible including everyone of legal age, and those who are not violent criminals or adjudicated mental incompetents.

I'm an NRA member myself, so I guess I'm not conservative enough for this crew. Enjoy gents.

 

[skt239]

The NRA is a joke and from what I hear, going bankrupt. But every scam eventually goes belly up so it’s not surprising. Why would the govt be worried about guns in the hands of one of the most passive people in history? No one is taking your guns. And what good does putting your meal ticket in camps do for a corporatacy? America is the ideal situation for a country with ruling criminal political class.

 

[hellcatrydr]

This little psycho had a lifelong and well documented history of mental illness
including a stay in the nuthouse.

He never should have been allowed to buy a gun.

In any case, this discussion is the first I'm hearing of people saying that people with a diagnosed history of paranoid schizophrenics, mental retardation, etc.

I think he was illustrating the moonbat hysteria that would come..

.

 

[Tpat591]

Yeah, I can't say I'm too worried about getting put into a camp, but maybe I'm just being optimistic. In any case, this discussion is the first I'm hearing of people saying that people with a diagnosed history of paranoid schizophrenics, mental retardation, etc. should have full gun ownership rights. That goes against the positions of most gun rights orgs that I've seen including...

the NRA:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms


The GOA:
https://www.gunowners.org/red-flag-hearing-texas-senate.htm


and the Second Amendment Foundation:
https://www.saf.org/gun-rights-faq/


I'm an NRA member myself, so I guess I'm not conservative enough for this crew. Enjoy gents.

I think a year or two ago most in this thread would have agreed with you and those esteemed organizations. We in this thread have had our eyes wide open this past year and a half and have watched the powers that be over play their hand time and again to lay bare their true intent. We know there is a deep seated plot to take away the second and the first amendments and we will give no quarter any more.

We have watched over 100 psychologists & psychiatrists diagnose the POTUS as being mentally ill and unfit for service from afar without ever examining him in violation of their own professional ethics for political purposes on multiple occasions when it is clear that is not the case. We have repeated seen sworn public officials in the FBI, CIA, DOJ and Judges on the bench violate their oaths of office to defy, impede, subvert, and attempt to depose a duly elected POTUS in what I consider open acts of treason against the United States of America. We have seen staged school shootings and terrorist attacks repeatedly carried out on the citizenry of our nation for decades to further the goals of eroding our rights, curtailing our freedoms, and the complete removal of our right of privacy and gun ownership by deeply entrenched bad actors in our intelligence communities.

The current push to adjudicate the mental health of gun owners in absentia without examination and without due process to effect a weapons seizure is a step too far. We have seen that corruption exists in all levels of the government and in every profession and more importantly we have seen a marked ramp up in the willingness of nefarious actors within all levels of the Government, professional communities and legal system to willingly abuse their powers for political purpose or the pursuit of personal gain.

We say no more! It will not be tolerated any longer.

 

[hellcatrydr]

Well said Pat.

 

[pulsevape]

The NRA is a joke and from what I hear, going bankrupt. But every scam eventually goes belly up so it’s not surprising. Why would the govt be worried about guns in the hands of one of the most passive people in history? No one is taking your guns. And what good does putting your meal ticket in camps do for a corporatacy? America is the ideal situation for a country with ruling criminal political class.

the elite have a long history of not being able to realize when they've over played their hand...they are always totally surprised when the rabble show up at the palace gates with guillotines.....they too thought their rabble were passive.

 

[pulsevape]

Yeah, I can't say I'm too worried about getting put into a camp, but maybe I'm just being optimistic. In any case, this discussion is the first I'm hearing of people saying that people with a diagnosed history of paranoid schizophrenics, mental retardation, etc. should have full gun ownership rights. That goes against the positions of most gun rights orgs that I've seen including...

the NRA:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms


The GOA:
https://www.gunowners.org/red-flag-hearing-texas-senate.htm


and the Second Amendment Foundation:
https://www.saf.org/gun-rights-faq/


I'm an NRA member myself, so I guess I'm not conservative enough for this crew. Enjoy gents.

bye bye.

 

[Tpat591]

Yeah, I can't say I'm too worried about getting put into a camp, but maybe I'm just being optimistic. In any case, this discussion is the first I'm hearing of people saying that people with a diagnosed history of paranoid schizophrenics, mental retardation, etc. should have full gun ownership rights. That goes against the positions of most gun rights orgs that I've seen including...

the NRA:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms


The GOA:
https://www.gunowners.org/red-flag-hearing-texas-senate.htm


and the Second Amendment Foundation:
https://www.saf.org/gun-rights-faq/


I'm an NRA member myself, so I guess I'm not conservative enough for this crew. Enjoy gents.

Perhaps this will sum it up better than I ever could:

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[PoppaVic]

Solution is easy: charge people to NOT own a firearm. And, then you start letting The People resolve their differences - without this nonsense of catch&release, (prison and parole). Death Is Only The Beginning.

 

[Tpat591]

Parents Fight Back After Atlanta School Replaces ‘Pledge of Allegiance’ With Oath to ‘Global Society’

 

[Tpat591]

Iran takes control of major oil shipping route warning US: You DON'T belong here
OIL prices could soar after Iran claimed it had taken full control of the Persian Gulf, a key oil shipping route in the Middle East.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...ald-Trump-twitter-US-United-States-Washington

 

[Tpat591]

Iran takes US to COURT over sanctions accusing US of plot to destroy economy
IRAN’S relations with the US have sunk to another low as the Islamic Republic is taking America to court over Donald Trump’s sanctions.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...d-trump-sanctions-nuclear-deal-world-court-US

 

[hellcatrydr]

Solution is easy: charge people to NOT own a firearm. And, then you start letting The People resolve their differences - without this nonsense of catch&release, (prison and parole). Death Is Only The Beginning.

Mister yer outta line... you need to say the Oath to Global Society 3 times!

 

[hellcatrydr]

.....School Replaces ‘Pledge of Allegiance’ With Oath to ‘Global Society’

Seriously... get a rope. Get a lotta fvcking ropes.

.

 

[Tpat591]

Seriously... get a rope. Get a lotta fvcking ropes.

.

Gotta start them young - That was the problem with us. By the time they were subjecting us to the EU indoctrination, it was too late - We had too many years of the Pledge of Allegiance and the Star Spangled Banner on TV (along with it's conflicting subliminal messages) twice a day, every day, most of our lives.

You really got to give them credit for perseverance though. You are right, these socialist teachers absolutely will not stop and a rope may be the only realistic answer.

 

[Tpat591]

They actually believe this bullshit huh? Lot of people gonna be in for a rude awakening if the truth ever comes out.

 

[Tpat591]

Now that's funny

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[Tpat591]

 

[SteveS45]

And there are people (Psychiatrists) who would gladly testify by the very threatening nature of your statement you are mentally unfit to own those firearms and many more who would gladly lie and say you personally threatened them your weapons must be confiscated for the good of society - to protect the children...
I'm not saying that....But that is where this line of thought inevitably leads...Especially when one examines the all out social media censorship assault currently underway in America & around the globe. David Hogg's hitler youth got half the conservative media's youtube accounts suspended in a deliberate media censorship campaign shortly after Parkland when he didn't like that he wasn't winning the hearts and minds of the people.

 

[HazyShades]

They actually believe this bullshit huh? Lot of people gonna be in for a rude awakening if the truth ever comes out.

Yeah but last night I read an article on Facebook where Brietbart of all organizations
was eulogizing the songbird.

 

[HazyShades]

Parents Fight Back After Atlanta School Replaces ‘Pledge of Allegiance’ With Oath to ‘Global Society’

Dude!
I was aghast when my son told me at the beginning of this year's summer vacation
that the Miami-Dade County Schools system now requires a mandatory time of community service
in order to graduate kids and issue high school diplomas to them.

Here I waited for the summer recess for most of the school year
so my boy would help me get some stuff done to make ready to sell this house
BUT NO.....
Instead of helping me get this crap done in a timely manner so we can get heck out of this part of Dodge
he's off helping underprivileged kids all summer... "But son, being middle class we're underprivileged...is the school going to hire
somebody to help your dad?"

 

[Rossum]

I try to limit my responses to this thread but I own many firearms that are Legally Registered with the Federal government and they will have to pry them from my cold dead hands to say I do not have the right to own and possess them. A couple of thousand rounds of ammo to back up my statement.

So you own many NFA guns? What are they? Full autos? Short-barreled rifles?

Because there is no Federal registration of ordinary firearms.

 

[pulsevape]

Check this out...... apparently there is a movement on the internet called "verified Hate" that is exposing how mainstream it is to hold racist attitudes towars whites and how twitter endorses it while they shut down conservatives on the flimsiest excuses....and these racists are not fringe loonies but leaders in the Media,Academia,and Hollywood.....it is not unreasonable to assume what is happening in South Africa could happen here in America given the large scope, and the power and influence many of these racists hold.
https://twitter.com/meme_america?lang=en

 

[SMOKIE]

 

[Time]

Apples and oranges. I'm talking about individuals who have been committed to a mental health institution, and/or diagnosed with a severe mental illness/handicap, not in some devious effort to deny those individuals their rights, but to treat them. In that case, it's not about whose got the best/most experts, but what the records state.

And there's the rub. If they are that sick, they are institutionalised. I'm unaware of any mental institution that allows guns. If they are not that sick to be institutionalized, they have been deemed to not be a threat to themselves or the public, by those same psychs that you think should deem them too dangerous to own a gun. Either they are a threat, or they are not.

It's not a matter of being afraid. It's a matter of understanding that firearms ownership is inextricably tied with a certain level of responsibility. To put it another way, I don't fear my 6 year old son, but he's far from having the maturity required to own a firearm. An adult with the mental capacity of a 6 year old, as determined by a number of psychiatrists / psychologists over his medical history, is no different.

It is a matter of being afraid. I don't expect an adult with the mental capacity of a six year old to be running around on their own any more than the six year old. There's that rub again.

We already have laws for people that are deemed a danger to themselves or others. I'm not sure how you can reconcile the difference between psychs that release these people to the public on the grounds that they are not a danger but at the same time expect these same psychs to remove these people's rights on the grounds that they are a danger. Any good attorney, whether for an individual trying to get his rights restored or in a wrongful death suit against the doctor or institution for say, a mentally ill person killing an individual with a knife, will surely ask the psych why a person was released that the doctor claimed was not a threat to himself or others but was felt to be a threat to own a firearm. Those two things do not mesh. The individual was a threat or was not.

You literally have to contradict yourself, as a psych, to make such a determination.

But that is not the worst part. The worse part is arbitrarily stripping the rights of an individual that may not ever harm a person, also known as an innocent person. The second worse part is your "determined by a number of psychiatrists / psychologists over his medical history". Not all mentally ill people are stupid. Many will refuse to ever be evaluated and treated for a mental issue such as depression or anxiety for fear of being stripped of their rights in the future. Smart people will be afraid of going to the doctor. They will not seek treatment. They will not want a medical history lest it be twisted into them losing their rights. That's the opposite of what needs to happen.

Something to think about.

 

[pulsevape]

And there's the rub. If they are that sick, they are institutionalised. I'm unaware of any mental institution that allows guns. If they are not that sick to be institutionalized, they have been deemed to not be a threat to themselves or the public, by those same psychs that you think should deem them too dangerous to own a gun. Either they are a threat, or they are not.




It is a matter of being afraid. I don't expect an adult with the mental capacity of a six year old to be running around on their own any more than the six year old. There's that rub again.

We already have laws for people that are deemed a danger to themselves or others. I'm not sure how you can reconcile the difference between psychs that release these people to the public on the grounds that they are not a danger but at the same time expect these same psychs to remove these people's rights on the grounds that they are a danger. Any good attorney, whether for an individual trying to get his rights restored or in a wrongful death suit against the doctor or institution for say, a mentally ill person killing an individual with a knife, will surely ask the psych why a person was released that the doctor claimed was not a threat to himself or others but was felt to be a threat to own a firearm. Those two things do not mesh. The individual was a threat or was not.

You literally have to contradict yourself, as a psych, to make such a determination.

But that is not the worst part. The worse part is arbitrarily stripping the rights of an individual that may not ever harm a person, also known as an innocent person. The second worse part is your "determined by a number of psychiatrists / psychologists over his medical history". Not all mentally ill people are stupid. Many will refuse to ever be evaluated and treated for a mental issue such as depression or anxiety for fear of being stripped of their rights in the future. Smart people will be afraid of going to the doctor. They will not seek treatment. They will not want a medical history lest it be twisted into them losing their rights. That's the opposite of what needs to happen.

Something to think about.

“In a mad world, only the mad are sane.”

― Akira Kurosawa

 

[Ralph_K]

I try to limit my responses to this thread but I own many firearms that are Legally Registered with the Federal government and they will have to pry them from my cold dead hands to say I do not have the right to own and possess them. A couple of thousand rounds of ammo to back up my statement.

I prefer to illegally register mine

 

[Time]

“In a mad world, only the mad are sane.”

― Akira Kurosawa

Veterans already face this problem.

Lawmakers want VA to restore gun rights stripped from some veterans ...
House passes bill to restore gun rights to Veterans - Guns.com
The VA is restricting veterans' gun rights without due process | TheHill
260,000 Vets Stripped of Their Gun Rights With a Single VA Gun ...

I find it very difficult to recommend a Veteran to go to the VA to seek treatment or help for PTSD, Depression, Dementia, Alzhiemers, TBI and what-not lest they be stripped of their rights.

The slippery slope of mental health and gun control already exists. It's just largely ignored because,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the right thinks it needs a scapegoat to limit the gun debate. Limiting it to mental health gives the libs some removal of rights and let's others keep theirs. As long as they get to keep their guns, fuck those that lose theirs for arbitrary reasons.

 

[Ralph_K]

The NRA is a joke and from what I hear, going bankrupt. But every scam eventually goes belly up so it’s not surprising. Why would the govt be worried about guns in the hands of one of the most passive people in history? No one is taking your guns. And what good does putting your meal ticket in camps do for a corporatacy? America is the ideal situation for a country with ruling criminal political class.

NRA used to be anti second amendment not that their pro second amendment now. NRA had a hand in every gun control law until the 80s

 

[pulsevape]

Veterans already face this problem.

Lawmakers want VA to restore gun rights stripped from some veterans ...
House passes bill to restore gun rights to Veterans - Guns.com
The VA is restricting veterans' gun rights without due process | TheHill
260,000 Vets Stripped of Their Gun Rights With a Single VA Gun ...

I find it very difficult to recommend a Veteran to go to the VA to seek treatment or help for PTSD, Depression, Dementia, Alzhiemers, TBI and what-not lest they be stripped of their rights.

The rabbit hole of mental health and gun control already exists. It's just largely ignored because,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the right thinks it needs a scapegoat to limit the gun debate. Limiting it to mental health gives the libs some removal of rights and let's others keep theirs. As long as they get to keep their guns, fuck those that lose theirs for arbitrary reasons.

Obamacare made it a point of forcing doctors to report on anyone who sought treatment for depression or anxoety to disclose if they had guns in their homes....considering almost everyone will struggle with depression at some point in their life this was a de facto effort to disarm as many people as possible, and as you say it had the effect of making people leery about seeking treatment for their problems....unless of course you have Trump derangment syndrome in which case they handed you a box of hollow points and directions to the Senate baseball field.
I even had my daughter bring a form home from school asking whether or not there were guns in her home....I told her to do what any red blooded American would do when asked by the goverment for personal information.....LIE

 

[pulsevape]

another aspect of this whole movement to disarm the people,is London....recently gun-free London surpassed NYC for violent crimes...So here we have one of ,if not the very pinnicale of Socialist experiments in the west, a country who has an aggresive White genocide policiy, whose elites are rabid SJWs, who have a brutal censorship of political dissent , and all these policies are being sold as progressive and enlightened and yet the REALITY is London is a violent disarmed shithole.where knife and acid attacks are as common as Pakistani rape gangs.....some interesting thoughts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=8NKHdLqaRQY

ELVIS IS ALIVE!!!

 

[Tpat591]

Besides who do you think came up with the concept that it is a good idea to allow a middle age Tranny man to use the same bathroom as your eight year old daughter for christ sakes? Do you really thing the Democrats would ever be able to pass a law like that anywhere in America without a host of these professional morons swearing that the concept that there are only two genders was a fallacy? Do you think you would be seeing Tranny Time Book readings in schools if a host of psychiatrists and psychologists didn't sign off on it?

These psychiatrists and psychologists are up to their necks in the conspiracy to destroy America and you want to give them the power to determine if you are allowed to keep your weapons?

 

[Tpat591]

Ben Garrison's Conservative Cartoon Website has been blocked from the Web. He now joins the conservative cartoon twitter website Poltoons in internet Jail.

Apparently some feel he overstepped recently - Unacceptable censorship of free speech!

Correction: After the Website was coming up 404 & later "403 Forbidden Website Domain" for the last 24 - 36 Hours Ben's Website has now returned to the internet but is struggling under heavy DDOS attack at this moment.

 

[pulsevape]

Besides who do you think came up with the concept that it is a good idea to allow a middle age Tranny man to use the same bathroom as your eight year old daughter for christ sakes? Do you really thing the Democrats would ever be able to pass a law like that anywhere in America without a host of these professional morons swearing that the concept that there are only two genders was a fallacy? Do you think you would be seeing Tranny Time Book readings in schools if a host of psychiatrists and psychologists didn't sign off on it?

These psychiatrists and psychologists are up to their necks in the conspiracy to destroy America and you want to give them the power to determine if you are allowed to keep your weapons?

I don't so much know if they believe this horseshit, as they realize that the big paychecks they get and the social recognistion and approval they recieve as "Intelligent" "learned" people would be ripped from them if they did not go along with the narritive.....they are no different than anyone else...do you want to go take a walk down the streets of say LA or San Franciso,or NY with a MAGA hat on...the reality in America is we live in fear of the left we are not free to speak our minds, because the elites have created a narritive where we are being marginalized as dnagerous scum..who should be obliterated.Do you really think you can enter the halls of Academia and say there are just two sexes.....the entire "Minority" facility would call for your resignation and the repeal of whatever degrees you had...Your professional,economic,and social life would be destroyed.

 

[pulsevape]

Ben Garrison's Conservative Cartoon Website has been blocked from the Web. He now joins the conservative cartoon twitter website Poltoons in internet Jail.

View attachment 118719
Apparently some feel he overstepped recently - Unacceptable censorship of free speech!

kids this is getting scary...this is getting Hugo Chavez, Fidel, Stalin ...scary...we cannot have a peacefull society when censorship is allowed...