This particular risk is also not the only risk involved with using these types of batteries. Maybe if you were humble enough you'd know about that.
I actually do despite your seeming to want to deny that. It's fine too, you don't know me, I don't you. we both could read a lot of different things about one another in our texts, things which may or may not be true, we'd not know because we're ignorant of one another. Ignorance is curable, it's called learning, asking, getting experience.
So far you've seemed to not desire that path. Instead you draw up your assumptions of me and what I write. Then, you assail. All I did was ask why you chose that. i'm not alone in seeing it as you directing an attack at one person in particular. It was pointed out to you as well. You still missed offering a logical answer. I can only observe that I've noted a lot of arrogant people do similar. Human beings and as a human being we're all keen to draw inferences, patterns. I dislike arrogant people, especially if they have no cause for the arrogance.
Will grant that is likely something negative in my persona, I need to address. At the same time not sure I'm desiring to change myself simply to be a lackey of sorts. Does not suit me to patronize anyone, let alone myself.
Also yet another mistake of yours is that I never said listen to Mooch first and only,
You misread. I never stated you said that. What I stated was it
seems you defer to Mooch and Mooch only, and you held him to Godhood status. Yes, I summarized what I stated there. That's not deception. It is only summary and is indeed the crux and exactness of what I said.
Reading you
seem to place such high significance on a singular source, I did presume that was your only source. That to me did seem rather dull at best, lacking any indication of choosing to learn. Learning often requires multiple sources, I think we can agree on that. So, if that presumption was an error it was one of perception of what you presented. That still falls into being your choice.
I don't see Mooch contradicts himself about anything whatsoever in the post you linked
Well, he in that post stated that 20 Amp batteries were in my own words, rather suitable. Then, he later on, as in some other date in the past recent month or so rails on how 20 Amp batteries are a scourge. He now "endorses" only 25 Amp batteries. To me that reads as contradiction. I also see contradiction in the phrase, .. "In the beginning there was the Word, ..". It is not merely in Mooch's altering of opinion that I see contradiction. i'm rather strange like that, I comprehend contradiction too easily I think. Again though, not changing myself to be defined by anyone but myself, thanks.
I disagree with you, yes I do. Not in the advice you give exactly. I disagree with you in your choice of how you create a seeming tornado of drama by apparent trolling, verbal and literary assault of other people as your means of conveying that advice. I disagree with you that your advice is Holy Writ from On High. I disagree with you that you seem to think, I think my advice is Holy Writ. I don't. Take my advice or leave it. I don't try patronizing people deliberately. Like you I think people need to take initiative to learn. Unlike you, at least seemingly, I don't have a need to put other people down to look good or feel good, over advice, gee .. c'mon, really?
So you showing up all full of damned torpedoes careening in my direction, and I ask "hey, what's the idea", and you giving no reason ... yes, that I can and do hold disagreeing. I might even tell you to go un-fuck yourself because in my estimation you are not worth a fuck. Note, I said might, not that I did or do yet. I learn, that's my choice. you've not brought any lessons despite touting otherwise, save for me noting I need to not presume. I did wait to do that though.
You seemed to me to not have desire to learn. You shut the conversation down by reigning Hell on me. This is not the first we've crossed paths. You continue doing that with me. I can only perceive it that you do have a particular problem with me. Ergo, I asked, you didn't answer except to say you were being sarcastic perhaps so didn't attack others. Okay? How does sarcasm manage that? Not following your logic there. I admit being dense at times, but c'mon don't patronize me either. But, ... You do and you attack. Again, your choice. My choice then is to write you off as the class of person I've no great interest in knowing, in learning from.
I've seen enough hate to know it well. Thanks, I pass. Rather be more productive with love.
Editing rationale: Cleared up some minor grammar, added a word or two i had skipped typing in. Flow of consciousness writing, conversational tone often evades me in that area. No deception in the editing, sorry. 
️ Cloud Chasing