thing is, with my flavorings i have and the juices.. they all come out clean.. acetoin or not.. nothing is being traced.. down to the lowest level..
Me too-- I am looking forward to heat testing! My web research skills leave a lot to be desired, so if you know of any sites I should be watching for info & further research on this topic, I would be really grateful!
i can understand lirruping
they are working on bringing flavors out, they know they have only a few with acetoin, but.. i think they are doing more work with testing and other such things.. give them a bit of time, and i think the company will shine.. they are rather small, but good people trying to do their best..
the one thing that tickles me is that they do use outside labs for testing and consult with people that have been around..
it is a few of the creams.. but like i said, they are working on things..
Not to start a whole big thing--and I mean it sincerely--but I can't help but notice you said that they "know they only have a few with acetoin..." If they knew that, I wish they would instruct their customer service personnel to answer direct questions from potential customers with the truth! This sort of thing--any vendor's unwillingness to be frank and open about the information they do have--is what gets a bee in my bonnet.
I believe they are good people. I believe many (if not most) small-ish juice companies got into doing what they do for the same reasons most of us stopped smoking and started vaping. I also believe that at some level, what kind of people they are and their best intentions are all beside the point.
I think I am so sensitive to this issue in part because for nearly 30 years, through illness, financial exigency--come what may--I found a way to PAY cigarette companies to lie to me (or at least conceal information as well as their big bucks would allow) and to poison me. I am tired of feeling like a slave and tired of having no recourse, tired of being lied to. So my patience is a little thin.
On the other hand, I think it's actually really important that the "vaping community" include vendors--that there not be a huge division over this kind of stuff. Or is that the same hand? Yes, I think that's part of my first point: when juice vendors dance around the truth or outright lie because they feel they are covering their asses, they misunderstand the real situation, which is: we are all in the same boat.
Ok, well.. derp. So much for "no big thing".
Smoky,
I was excited when I heard they had come out with DIY flavorings and were having that sale because they advertised as D & AP free & I was just ordering my first DIY supplies. They also claimed they were the only ones in "the industry" to provide that absence, which I am pretty sure is not the case (FA?) but I thought, "eh-- it's marketing. no harm no foul--whatever".
Also, I was interested because my first-ever purchase of e-liquid (only six months ago!) was from them--through a B&M in Watertown, MA which sold only NicVape, Firebrand, and NicQuid. The store owners said they carried only these juices because each of the three companies had a certified ... "clean room", I believe it was. Just curious--did they have you do any special procedures, like wearing a mask or a jumpsuit, when you toured their facility?
I got something called American Tobacco--this was back when I thought I was going to be vaping tobacco flavors pretty much exclusively, har!--and their banana flavor. i thought both of them were great. I only later learned how unusual it is to come across a banana flavored juice that actually tastes like fruit, and not that stuff I use to spray on my bike chain. So, I was/am holding out some hope for them as well. If you think of it, please ask them to get going on releasing that banana flavor!
Works every time!Pictures smoky kicking her PC with her boots, then scrubbing it clean from boot marks....
[/QUOTE=Smoky Blue] they test each batch, and if it does not pass, they incinerate it.. no lie, i saw the equipment for that..
One of the files you are including is from March with a blacked out manufacturer. I'm assuming that is from their old line.you have to make sure you are using capitols and right numbers..
i flubbed a few times too..
here are the files..
Aw..shucks. No, you!You rock @lirruping
Aw..shucks. No, you!
@RocketPuppy, I was going to send you a message as a follow-up to your OP--the very useful evolving vendor list & abbreviations, etc., but I will post the question here instead, since it's somewhat related to the discussion. (If anyone knows where it might be better placed, please let me know).
I was on the AEMSA site and came across this:
"The e-liquid flavor supply chain is complex. Most U.S. e-liquid manufactures buy flavors components from the same, industry standard 10 companies (“End Flavor Suppliers”). But there are various companies within the supply chain moving flavor products (e.g., wholesaler to wholesaler) between the source manufacturer and the End Flavor Supplier. Some of these companies may be “compounders” who combine flavors, after source manufacture, to create new or combined/compounded flavors. When an End Flavor Supplier claims that its products are diacetyl- and/or acetyl propionyl-“free,” they may be relying on claims from the source manufacturer, and may not be aware of possible mid-supply-chain “compounding”.
I am not particularly in-the-know about this stuff, but I wasn't even aware there was a supply-chain that existed pre-"end flavor supplier"--let alone that it was so opaque, possibly even to the EFSs themselves. I find this disconcerting. I guess I was imagining that most of these companies--or the main ones at least--were producing their flavors in-house, using relatively basic and regular (in the sense of reliably the same) chemical components bought from laboratory supply outfits.
The AEMSA page goes on to talk about how critical it is that end product (e-liquids) be tested by vendors. This seems sensible to me, but I see no discussion yet about investigating in the other direction, i.e., looking back up the "flavor supply chain". Even as an e-liquid consumer (and especially as an almost-DIY'er) I am interested in learning more about this--pinning down the flavor supply chain--and I would think it would be something juice vendors would definitely want to pursue for all kinds of reasons. If this chain could be made fully transparent and reliably documented, would the need for continuous end-product testing (that is currently so bogging down the industry) be greatly diminished?
My questions run like this: where to begin? Is anyone working on the project of making the flavor supply chain less shadowy and vague? How can I find out more? (I guess I need to make an inquiry to AEMSA about it to start with, now that I think of it.)
Do others think it an important direction for the industry broadly to work in? Or is it just easier (and safer) to test the end result in every single case? The latter seems like it would be cost-prohibitive for most juice companies out there, whereas investigating the supply chain pre-End Flavor Supplier--while probably not quickly or easily accomplished--costs man-hours rather than money. And any information that is uncovered can be of potential use to the entire community, rather than a single company.
Despite possible appearances to the contrary, I don't want to hijack this thread, so if it feels off-topic AND is a topic of interest to more than just myself, maybe it should go elsewhere. All of this is me just thinking out-loud...so to speak...err, type. You know what I mean. Off to bed with me!
To note - some manufacturers are under strict NDA's that prevent them from revealing the true root manufacturer of a flavoring.Good questions, @lirruping.. Here is one of mine.. Should a vendor be required to "out" their source? Would that hurt or help said vendor? If vendor is doing testing on their different creations, with proof of it? Where does it stop and i agree, how far up the chain do you say this is enough, or more needed.. ??
Lots of questions..
Aw..shucks. No, you!
@RocketPuppy, I was going to send you a message as a follow-up to your OP--the very useful evolving vendor list & abbreviations, etc., but I will post the question here instead, since it's somewhat related to the discussion. (If anyone knows where it might be better placed, please let me know).
......
My questions run like this: where to begin? Is anyone working on the project of making the flavor supply chain less shadowy and vague? How can I find out more? (I guess I need to make an inquiry to AEMSA about it to start with, now that I think of it.)
!
This meant as a manufacturer we would have to test each and every batch of flavoring that we purchased, in of itself this is an obtainable process, but what happens when it fails the test? The manufacture would most likely be stuck with unusable product! As a manufacture this poses many issues to items like production cost and production times.
this is an exert from an article I wrote for vapor digest last month - http://vapordigest.com/vapor-digest-issue-3/ pg 32
Why independent testing?
The flavoring the vaping industry was created on where always and still are created for food manufacturing. In the food-manufacturing world there are different standards than what we need for the vaping industry. For example any product that has less than 1% Diacetyl can be labeled as “Diacetyl Free”. To put that in perspective 1% is 1000 ug/ml or 200 times greater that the levels that are in my opinion acceptable for our vaping products.
The other reason for independent testing is the nature of the food flavoring industry itself. Generally there are two types of providers:
1- Root manufactures – This provider is the actual manufacturer of the flavoring ingredients. They create flavors for major food manufacturing operations such as coca cola and general mills. They focus on major mass manufacturing. There is another important fact…. Most do not want anything to do with the vaping industry. Root manufactures are generally very protective of the processes and ingredients that are used to create their products, bind purchasers to very strict Non-Disclosure Agreements and they do not test to levels that are needed for this industry. They view it as an immature and risky industry.
2 – Compounders – They provider supply the majority of our industry. A compounder purchases root material and mixes it to create the products the industry uses. This presents some challenges for the compounders in the fact they often do not know exactly what is in the ingredients they use and that to insure that they meet the DA/AP limits this industry needs outside 3rd party testing is needed to verify the levels. This often does not happen.
Inconsistency Batch to Batch
As Manufactures we face another issue with traditional flavoring providers as illustrated by what NicVape underwent to address the DA/AP issue:
NicVape was alerted in January 2014 that some of the flavorings NicVape used could potentially contain diacetyl despite the supplier indications. In response, NicVape began to test every flavoring used in production. We performed this testing in January of 2014. We began testing our root flavorings in the order of most likely to contain diacetyl or acetyl propionyl to least likely. Diacetyl and acetyl propionyl was detected in 38 of 69 flavors at levels ranging from non-detected (ND) to 6423 µg/ml. Those items where immediately discontinued.
We approached our flavoring providers and asked them to remove diacetyl and acetyl propionyl from their products. If the flavoring manufacturers were not amenable to the change, NicVape found new manufacturers that would adhere to NicVape and AMESA diacetyl standards.
Subsequent to approaching our providers and in some cases, finding new ones, NicVape again tested all of our flavorings for diacetyl and acetyl propionyl in March 2014. Diacetyl and acetyl propionyl was detected in 4 flavorings. To complicate the issue we found that diacetyl or acetyl propionyl in a flavoring could vary from batch to batch, indicating that the supply chain as we knew it was unreliable.
This meant as a manufacturer we would have to test each and every batch of flavoring that we purchased, in of itself this is an obtainable process, but what happens when it fails the test? The manufacture would most likely be stuck with unusable product! As a manufacture this poses many issues to items like production cost and production times.
end exert
this is an exert from an article I wrote for vapor digest last month - http://vapordigest.com/vapor-digest-issue-3/ pg 32
Why independent testing?
The flavoring the vaping industry was created on where always and still are created for food manufacturing. In the food-manufacturing world there are different standards than what we need for the vaping industry. For example any product that has less than 1% Diacetyl can be labeled as “Diacetyl Free”. To put that in perspective 1% is 1000 ug/ml or 200 times greater that the levels that are in my opinion acceptable for our vaping products.
The other reason for independent testing is the nature of the food flavoring industry itself. Generally there are two types of providers:
1- Root manufactures – This provider is the actual manufacturer of the flavoring ingredients. They create flavors for major food manufacturing operations such as coca cola and general mills. They focus on major mass manufacturing. There is another important fact…. Most do not want anything to do with the vaping industry. Root manufactures are generally very protective of the processes and ingredients that are used to create their products, bind purchasers to very strict Non-Disclosure Agreements and they do not test to levels that are needed for this industry. They view it as an immature and risky industry.
2 – Compounders – They provider supply the majority of our industry. A compounder purchases root material and mixes it to create the products the industry uses. This presents some challenges for the compounders in the fact they often do not know exactly what is in the ingredients they use and that to insure that they meet the DA/AP limits this industry needs outside 3rd party testing is needed to verify the levels. This often does not happen.
Inconsistency Batch to Batch
As Manufactures we face another issue with traditional flavoring providers as illustrated by what NicVape underwent to address the DA/AP issue:
NicVape was alerted in January 2014 that some of the flavorings NicVape used could potentially contain diacetyl despite the supplier indications. In response, NicVape began to test every flavoring used in production. We performed this testing in January of 2014. We began testing our root flavorings in the order of most likely to contain diacetyl or acetyl propionyl to least likely. Diacetyl and acetyl propionyl was detected in 38 of 69 flavors at levels ranging from non-detected (ND) to 6423 µg/ml. Those items where immediately discontinued.
We approached our flavoring providers and asked them to remove diacetyl and acetyl propionyl from their products. If the flavoring manufacturers were not amenable to the change, NicVape found new manufacturers that would adhere to NicVape and AMESA diacetyl standards.
Subsequent to approaching our providers and in some cases, finding new ones, NicVape again tested all of our flavorings for diacetyl and acetyl propionyl in March 2014. Diacetyl and acetyl propionyl was detected in 4 flavorings. To complicate the issue we found that diacetyl or acetyl propionyl in a flavoring could vary from batch to batch, indicating that the supply chain as we knew it was unreliable.
This meant as a manufacturer we would have to test each and every batch of flavoring that we purchased, in of itself this is an obtainable process, but what happens when it fails the test? The manufacture would most likely be stuck with unusable product! As a manufacture this poses many issues to items like production cost and production times.
end exert
@RocketPuppy I would be more than happy to discuss it with you when you have time
@Linc Williams, btw, the first link in your Vape Digest article--the one that's supposed to go to "Independent Toxicologist R. Patrick Rainey's study on the use of diacetyl and acetyl propionyl in e-liquid--this one here:
https://drive.google.com/fle/d/0B0JrO25MOsG5VjBBd0d4SlVNOXM/edit?usp=sharing
is broken. If you have a working link could you sling it up here when you get a chance?
A couple of clarifying questions re your article & some comments:
"...any product that has less than 1% Diacetyl can be labeled as “Diacetyl Free”. "
>You're talking about food additive regulations here, right?
>.
J
>Aren't there also relatively new diacetyl inhalation regs developed by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)--and created in response to the popcorn lung air-in-the-workplace exposure issue? From what I can recall of the Russ Wishtart interview with Dr. Farsalinos, he indicates that even these inhalation exposure regs are hard to translate to vaping safety since they are based on--well, not vaping, but on particles in the air over a period of time of normal breathing in a diacetyl contaminated work environment. (Reminds me of Sifl & Olly's chicken-flavored air-conditioning..in case anyone is old enough to remember that )
"To put that in perspective 1% is 1000 ug/ml or 200 times greater that the levels that are in my opinion acceptable for our vaping products."
> Your opinion of acceptable levels for liquids is based on what? Current AEMSA standards and/or a particular body of research? Can you say a little about how you got to your understanding of acceptable levels for your vaping products? And by "our vaping products" (in the article) do you mean NicVape's liquids or "our vaping products" as in "what we should be aiming for as a community/industry?"
.