jwill
The Great King of Nothing
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 2 Years
VU Challenge Team
Reddit Exile
VU SWAT
I was saying earlier to the other mods that I should copy/paste it where more people will see it.
But on the front of pseudo science and the fact that even the most highly respected scientific journals will accept a study no matter how stupid.
This is the one I usually use if some dipshit tries to argue with me:
(The BMJ is one of the highly respected scientific journals)
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7429/1459
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge.
Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases; appropriate internet sites and citation lists.
Study selection: Studies showing the effects of using a parachute during free fall.
Main outcome measure Death or major trauma, defined as an injury severity score > 15.
Results We were unable to identify any randomised controlled trials of parachute intervention.
Conclusions As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
I would have hated to have been the unlucky bastard who drew the short straw for this study.