Become a Patron!

FDA PMTA Deadline MIGHT BE Postponed Until September :)

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
Sounds like there's a great chance that the FDA might postpone the May 12, 2020 PMTA deadline, stating they are basically overwhelmed with COVID-19 crisis.

In other words, the FDA is spread too thin. ( :finger: )

They've asked the court to allow a 120-day postponement and the plaintiff (American Academy of Pediatrics) supposedly does not intend to oppose it.

From VTA...

BREAKING NEWS:
FDA SEEKS PMTA DEADLINE EXTENSION CITING COVID-19
March 30, 2020
https://vaportechnology.org/wp-cont...st-for-Extension-of-PMTA-Deadline-3-30-20.pdf

Today, the FDA submitted a letter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, in American Academy of Pediatrics, et al. v. FDA, et al., asking Judge Grimm to extend the May 12, 2020 court-ordered PMTA deadline by 120-days to September 9, 2020 “in light of the global outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a new coronavirus.”

FDA explained in its submission that “the global coronavirus outbreak poses unforeseen challenges and has made the May 12 deadline a public health risk to those who cannot comply with the deadline through telework.” In addition, FDA explained that telework also will complicate and delay FDA’s review of applications.

In deciding to request a 120-day extension, FDA noted that it had received requests from numerous trade associations and companies, including consultants involved in the PMTA process, for extensions “between 8 weeks and 180 days, with the majority of requests for 180 days.” VTA was one of those entities that submitted a request to FDA and did so on March 20, 2020 outlining the basis and necessity for deadline extensions for large manufacturers and small manufacturers.

At this point in time, no one can predict the length and severity of the COVID-19 commercial shutdown. FDA explicitly recognized this point in the Second Declaration of Mitchell Zeller which accompanied the letter to the Court. In his Declaration, Director Zeller testified: “It is not clear at this point what the precise impact of the COVID-19 outbreak will be on the scope of FDA’s ability to complete application reviews within the 12-month period of time once applications are filed.” That is precisely why VTA requested a new deadline of November 2020 (or at least 180 days from business resumption) for large manufacturers, and a new deadline of February 2021 (or at least 270 days from business resumption) for small manufacturers. To that end, VTA explained that “the question of whether these deadline changes are sufficient or ultimately realistic can and must be re-evaluated in the coming months as more information comes to light about the length and severity of the commercial shutdown due to COVID-19.”

Moreover, VTA also encouraged FDA to utilize the additional time to implement PMTA process modifications that will ensure the survival of small businesses and a diverse array of the vapor products on which former smokers now rely.

In its letter to the District Court, FDA notes that the plaintiffs (American Academy of Pediatrics, et al.) will not oppose the FDA’s request, though the plaintiffs have requested the opportunity to “express their misgivings about the extension on the record.” In order to rule, Judge Grimm still will have to have the case remanded to him by the Fourth Circuit and then he would need to make his decision on whether or not to grant the FDA’s request.

However, given the strong case made by the FDA, the obvious insurmountable obstacles created by the coronavirus, and the apparent lack of opposition by the plaintiffs, a ruling extending the deadline is reasonably likely though still not certain.
We will continue to monitor the situation and will keep you apprised.
 
Last edited:

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
Well, I guess no one cares. I guess we're all stocked up here on VU :giggle:
 

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
Update from the VTA:

"FDA SEEKS PMTA DEADLINE EXTENSION; COURT ISSUES INDICATIVE RULING
This week, the FDA submitted a letter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, in American Academy of Pediatrics, et al. v. FDA, et al., asking Judge Grimm to extend the May 12, 2020 court-ordered PMTA deadline by 120-days to September 9, 2020 “in light of the global outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a new coronavirus.”

In deciding to request a 120-day extension, the FDA noted that it had received requests from numerous trade associations and companies, including consultants involved in the PMTA process, for extensions “between 8 weeks and 180 days, with the majority of requests for 180 days.” VTA was one of those trade associations that submitted a request to the FDA and did so on March 20, 2020 outlining the basis and necessity for deadline extensions for large manufacturers and small manufacturers. VTA also encouraged the FDA to utilize the additional time to implement PMTA process modifications that will ensure the survival of small businesses and a diverse array of the vapor products on which former smokers now rely.

The District Court initially set a briefing schedule to allow the Plaintiffs time to present their arguments (even though they did not object to the FDA’s request) that ran dangerously close to the May 12, 2020 deadline. However, the Plaintiffs filed their written statement early and, today, the District Court issued an “Indicative Ruling” stating that if the case is remanded to the District Court from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (where the case currently resides), the District Court would extend the May 12, 2020 PMTA deadline to September 9, 2020.

This is an important development and with the understanding that no official order has yet extended the deadline, we presume that if the Court of Appeals remands the case promptly, the District Court will convert the Indicative Ruling into a former order extending the deadline. However, until that time, the deadline remains May 12, 2020. Upon the entry of the final order, we anticipate that the FDA will update its January 2020 guidance as indicated. We will keep you apprised of developments."
 

SnapDragon NY

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
VU SWAT
Last edited:

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
How many vape shops will still be operating by September with the essential only business thing?
But it does give mail order outfits time to order more stuff to be sold before September.

And most care but just see this as a short extension not a hope of any change for the better of what is coming.
 

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
The bad news is that the House Oversight Committee is urging the FDA to ban vape because somehow they know (lol) that vaping causes complications in COVID-19 patients. But they have no plans to ban tobacco.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oversight-committee-fda-ban-e-cigarettes-vaping-coronavirus-risks

Because they don't seem to be wanting to ban tobacco, just vape, I don't see how this ban could legally be put into effect. Ban all smoking tobacco and vaping? Yeah, I can see that but still would never bet on it.

Also, there may be evidence that smoking, and possibly vaping, actually does not cause further complications/challenges/higher mortality in CVD-19 patients.

https://www.qeios.com/read/article/560

But there isn't enough data to say for sure.
 

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
And most care but just see this as a short extension not a hope of any change for the better of what is coming.

Right, but an extension is still good news for those who need more time to stock up.

However, with so many people losing their income, and the economic situation not seeming to be getting better any time soon, it may not really be much of a help, tbh. And I can see online vape retailers not ordering as much inventory due to slowed sales.
 
Last edited:

eSMOKA

Silver Contributor
Member For 5 Years
I had already posted this info on Tuesday on the good news thread-

Oops, sorry. I don't usually visit many places outside the general section. Those other sections seem to be pretty well dead for the most part.
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
The bad news is that the House Oversight Committee is urging the FDA to ban vape because somehow they know (lol) that vaping causes complications in COVID-19 patients. But they have no plans to ban tobacco.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oversight-committee-fda-ban-e-cigarettes-vaping-coronavirus-risks

Because they don't seem to be wanting to ban tobacco, just vape, I don't see how this ban could legally be put into effect. Ban all smoking tobacco and vaping? Yeah, I can see that but still would never bet on it.

Also, there may be evidence that smoking, and possibly vaping, actually does not cause further complications/challenges/higher mortality in CVD-19 patients.

https://www.qeios.com/read/article/560

But there isn't enough data to say for sure.
I figure that smokers who have damaged their lungs to the point of COPD and such are very susceptible to the effects of Covid 19.
however if a smoker and lungs still in decent shape then probably not much different from non smoker.

Just my opinion though.
 

VU Sponsors

Top