I didn't take anything wrong...and yes its proven tiresome as of late
I know I can come off as brash, and speak rather straight forward and know a lot of people can take offense to me calling an item they like shit. But that is just me speaking my mind on rudimentary testing I do.
I talked to someone else about this recently, may of been gismit (Apologies, whom I have talks with, sometimes slip my mind) and he asked similarly what you asked.
Upside to the RDAs of late is they're cheaper than the RSAs I bought before that were equally shit lol Like $140+ range each, only difference with those, they were for squonking and not designed for high wattage vaping.
And I also have a control RSA as I do a Control RDA... in which all other RSAs are stacked up against.
I used to test mech squonks also, mosfet squonks and most of them, silver plated contacts or not, suck... its the nature of the beast though. The 510s are just added voltage loss points and dressing them up with silver contacts only changes the voltage against copper contacts at a minimal and I mean minimal difference, outside of cleaning said contacts.
A few of us in the Bonkers thread, especially myself, loved to always put the Pico Squeeze up against $300+ mech or other mosfet squonkers, and I think only 1 may of had better voltage at the time (18650) lil $27 squonker from China reigned supreme lol
Is the testing I do infallible? Nah, not in the slightest. But my methodology of Using the same exact coils in RDAs, the same mech, and the same battery against my control, only one variance is applicable (RDA) and there is no making up lost voltage.
Its simple yet damning to care of voltage, and reading others saying something hits hard, and you take it for face value... only to get said item and its garbage.
By no means cracking on Gadget... but its relevance is prime...
He said his hits like a truck at 3.26v, wonder how he would feel vaping one of mine at 3.7v+ (.12Ω) If a truck is 88w (3.26v)... 114w (3.7v) must be a semi
