Become a Patron!
To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?
- Thread starter SMOKIE
- Start date
- Status
Anyone catch Greg Gutfeld's show where he explained the 'real Russian connection' and the ties to Rachel Madcow? Fucking hilarious. As stupid as it was, it truly mimicked the kind of left wing conspiracy nuts only with a different narrative and really put into perspective what complete assclowns the left sound like.
I liked the idea of jailing the mayors of sanctuary cities....being a politician doesn't make you a God, it doesn't make you above the law...why is it only Democrat political hacks and mexicans can ignore the law.
That is what they should be doing. Can't understand why they are pussyfooting around local politicians violating the law. Slap them with obstruction charges & lock them up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.change.org/p/scarsdale-...twitter&utm_campaign=share_twitter_responsive
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
️
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-CIA-disguised-hacking-Russian-activity.html
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hhmm that would be under Obama right......what did he know and when did he know it....
yeah they thought their control of the propoganda mills,white guilt, a vagina, and their ability to steal the DNC nomination was enough to put it in the bag....they never expected wikileaks, or Trump to grab that old pussy.
Wikileaks only provided corroboration for a lot of what we already knew or suspected anyway so While it might have changed a million or so votes, I don't think it changed an awful lot in the outcome anyway beyond Hillary not thinking she needed to risk resorting to wholesale voter fraud to beat Trump from a scrutiny standpoint.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
You just gotta love Pat - He does tell it like it is very eloquently.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just remember the "Russian hack" THING IF TRUE.. never affected the government or governmental entity. . ONLY private businesses... the DNC and RC being Private Political organizations.
They only punked the press and parties.
I'm still not convinced it was the Russians..... Isreal and US are still my number one suspects.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
They only punked the press and parties.
I'm still not convinced it was the Russians..... Isreal and US are still my number one suspects.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
What we actually need to remember is that the hacks only brought factual evidence of criminal acts & collusion of the DNC & MSM to light.
What we have to remember is that we have not yet seen prosecutions based on those facts.
Everything else is bull
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All I know is.. the louder the Dems object the truer whatever the other side says is. With the Repub it's about what they DONT complain about that you worry. If they are quite on a subject they are lying.
At least that's the way it's been since 1976..... when I started paying attention.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
At least that's the way it's been since 1976..... when I started paying attention.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Imagine that.
Confirmed: Susan Rice "Unmasked" Trump Team
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed-susan-rice-unmasked-trump-team
Confirmed: Susan Rice "Unmasked" Trump Team
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed-susan-rice-unmasked-trump-team
I haven't seen one article that says on which dates she was viewing information though we know by rumor it goes way back before nomination.
Two articles I read specifically state this does not vindicate Trumps claim of wiretapping.
Deceitful spin doctors who will do anything to hunt their witch & justify sedition to remove a sitting president.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/24/vladimir-putin-hosts-marine-le-pen-in-moscow?
Putin tells Le Pen Russia has no plans to meddle in French election
Far-right candidate in French presidential election reaffirms support for dropping EU sanctions on Russia after meeting in Moscow
Shaun Walker in Moscow and Kim Willsher in Paris
Friday 24 March 2017 12.03 EDT First published on Friday 24 March 2017 07.49 EDT
Vladimir Putin has received Marine Le Pen in the Kremlin in a surprise move likely to reignite fears in Europe about Russian support for the European far right.
Putin told Le Pen Russia had no intention of meddling in the French presidential elections, though the meeting is likely to send the opposite message.
“We do not want to influence events in any way, but we retain the right to meet with all the different political forces, just like our European and American partners do,” said Putin.
Le Pen travelled to Moscow at the invitation of an MP for meetings in the Russian parliament, and had not been expected to meet Putin. However, after the parliamentary meetings were over the Front National candidate soon appeared in televised pictures from inside the Kremlin.
“Of course, it would be very interesting to share our opinions about how our bilateral relations are doing, and about the situation that is developing in Europe,” Putin told Le Pen. “I know that you represent a European political force that is growing quickly.”
Speaking after their meeting, Le Pen said Putin represented “a sovereign nation” and “new vision”.
“A new world has emerged in the past years. This is Vladimir Putin’s world, Donald Trump’s world in the United States, Mr [Narendra] Modi’s world in India,” she added.
“I think I am probably the one who shares with all these great nations a vision of cooperation and not one of subservience - a hawkish vision that has too often been expressed by the European Union.”
Russian support for Le Pen appears to have similar roots to the well-publicised backing of Donald Trump. There is both the pro-Moscow rhetoric of the candidate, and the broader goal of supporting a “chaos” candidate who would be likely to erode European unity on issues such as sanctions against Russia.
Le Pen has publicly backed the Russian annexation of Crimea and frequently expressed admiration for Putin.
A Russian hackers’ collective released emails that appeared to show Le Pen had received a loan from a Russian bank in 2014 in return for taking pro-Moscow positions in public.
Le Pen has denied those allegations, but makes no secret of the fact that the Front National has taken loans from foreign banks because French financial institutions refuse to fund the presidential campaign.
On Friday Le Pen said the subject of Russian financial backing for her party had not come up in her meeting with Putin. She did, however, reaffirm her position that if elected she would seek a swift removal of EU sanctions on Russia.
Earlier in the day she had called on Russia and France to work together to save the world from “globalisation and Islamic fundamentalism”, two of her campaign issues. “I’m a totally free woman,” she said. “I don’t want to be under the yoke of the US … I don’t want to be under the yoke of Russia.
“We are in a period where conspiracy theories appear to be very much in fashion. As soon as something goes wrong, it’s Russia’s fault. This makes me smile.”
Last year, Le Canard Enchaîné, the French satirical newspaper, reported that Mike Turner, a Republican on the US House of Representatives’ permanent select committee on intelligence, had urged American intelligence agencies to look into Le Pen’s Russia connections.
James Clapper, the then director of national intelligence, wrote in a letter dated 28 November that the Front National “publicly acknowledged that it had received a $9.8m loan from a Russian bank with links to the Kremlin, allegedly brokered by a sanctioned Russian Duma deputy, according to French press reports”.
The Front National treasurer, Wallerand de Saint-Just, has insisted Le Pen’s visit is not a campaign fundraising exercise. His comments came as party members admitted they were still short of millions to run the campaign.
Opinion polls suggest Le Pen and the independent centrist Emmanuel Macron will go through from the first-round presidential vote on 23 April to the second round run-off on 7 May.
Putin also has a good relationship with the rightwing Les Républicains candidate François Fillon, who also looks favourably on Moscow.
Putin tells Le Pen Russia has no plans to meddle in French election
Far-right candidate in French presidential election reaffirms support for dropping EU sanctions on Russia after meeting in Moscow
Shaun Walker in Moscow and Kim Willsher in Paris
Friday 24 March 2017 12.03 EDT First published on Friday 24 March 2017 07.49 EDT
Vladimir Putin has received Marine Le Pen in the Kremlin in a surprise move likely to reignite fears in Europe about Russian support for the European far right.
Putin told Le Pen Russia had no intention of meddling in the French presidential elections, though the meeting is likely to send the opposite message.
“We do not want to influence events in any way, but we retain the right to meet with all the different political forces, just like our European and American partners do,” said Putin.
Le Pen travelled to Moscow at the invitation of an MP for meetings in the Russian parliament, and had not been expected to meet Putin. However, after the parliamentary meetings were over the Front National candidate soon appeared in televised pictures from inside the Kremlin.
“Of course, it would be very interesting to share our opinions about how our bilateral relations are doing, and about the situation that is developing in Europe,” Putin told Le Pen. “I know that you represent a European political force that is growing quickly.”
Speaking after their meeting, Le Pen said Putin represented “a sovereign nation” and “new vision”.
“A new world has emerged in the past years. This is Vladimir Putin’s world, Donald Trump’s world in the United States, Mr [Narendra] Modi’s world in India,” she added.
“I think I am probably the one who shares with all these great nations a vision of cooperation and not one of subservience - a hawkish vision that has too often been expressed by the European Union.”
Russian support for Le Pen appears to have similar roots to the well-publicised backing of Donald Trump. There is both the pro-Moscow rhetoric of the candidate, and the broader goal of supporting a “chaos” candidate who would be likely to erode European unity on issues such as sanctions against Russia.
Le Pen has publicly backed the Russian annexation of Crimea and frequently expressed admiration for Putin.
A Russian hackers’ collective released emails that appeared to show Le Pen had received a loan from a Russian bank in 2014 in return for taking pro-Moscow positions in public.
Le Pen has denied those allegations, but makes no secret of the fact that the Front National has taken loans from foreign banks because French financial institutions refuse to fund the presidential campaign.
On Friday Le Pen said the subject of Russian financial backing for her party had not come up in her meeting with Putin. She did, however, reaffirm her position that if elected she would seek a swift removal of EU sanctions on Russia.
Earlier in the day she had called on Russia and France to work together to save the world from “globalisation and Islamic fundamentalism”, two of her campaign issues. “I’m a totally free woman,” she said. “I don’t want to be under the yoke of the US … I don’t want to be under the yoke of Russia.
“We are in a period where conspiracy theories appear to be very much in fashion. As soon as something goes wrong, it’s Russia’s fault. This makes me smile.”
Last year, Le Canard Enchaîné, the French satirical newspaper, reported that Mike Turner, a Republican on the US House of Representatives’ permanent select committee on intelligence, had urged American intelligence agencies to look into Le Pen’s Russia connections.
James Clapper, the then director of national intelligence, wrote in a letter dated 28 November that the Front National “publicly acknowledged that it had received a $9.8m loan from a Russian bank with links to the Kremlin, allegedly brokered by a sanctioned Russian Duma deputy, according to French press reports”.
The Front National treasurer, Wallerand de Saint-Just, has insisted Le Pen’s visit is not a campaign fundraising exercise. His comments came as party members admitted they were still short of millions to run the campaign.
Opinion polls suggest Le Pen and the independent centrist Emmanuel Macron will go through from the first-round presidential vote on 23 April to the second round run-off on 7 May.
Putin also has a good relationship with the rightwing Les Républicains candidate François Fillon, who also looks favourably on Moscow.
I wasn't expecting this to be this big. It doesn't surprise me, but still.
(through his spokesperson Kevin Lewis) "neither Barack Obama nor any White House official under Obama ever ordered surveillance of any U.S. citizen."
They can split hairs all they like, unmasking names to gain intelligence IS ordering surveillance.
I'm beginning to see that the whole Russian "Collusion" meme is not just a matter of the Dims not being able to handle the election loss. It's a cover. They thought they were going to win and nobody would ever know about the spying on Trump team for political gain. When they lost, they had to find a reason to have spied on the Trump team. "Incidental" collection of Russian communications is a cover. The problem they have is that the "unmasking" did not just happen with Russian communications.
This is nothing less than the Obama Administration using government intelligence agencies to spy on political opponents. Nothing less.
Last edited:
The I7 have been spying on each other's politicians and providing that intel back for plausible deniability for years. Judge Napolitano hit the nail on the head a month ago that the British were providing the CIA intel on Trump the entire run up to the primary election & beyond.
CIA floated Russian hacking as a way to discredit & remove Trump in event he would not play ball. Mattis has bombed all bridges & roads connecting northern & southern Syria to prepare to create a southern protected safe zone so it looks like Trump has either sold out to Deep State or is playing along long enough to survive until Sessions is ready to proceed to drain the swamp.
I'd like to think it is the latter due to all the rhetoric, but it could be the former. Turkey, Russia, & most of NATO appear to be gearing up for a major conflict & that ain't a good sign at all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
While I agree the CIA is trying to grenade any relationship with Russia, it looks to me that Trump is still focused on ISIS not Assad. Just last week they were trying to bash the Trump Admin for dropping the "Assad must go" theme. Bombing roads and bridges connecting northern and southern Syria prevents ISIS movements between Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq while the fight in Mosul continues. I wouldn't want ISIS to have a supply line.
I check this map fairly often, http://syria.liveuamap.com/
Some of the bridges bombed had no strategic necessity to be bombed unless the value of doing so was to deny Syrian & Russian troops from operations in the south as I understood reports.
The theory is that the ultimate goal is a partitioning of the country
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The theory is that the ultimate goal is a partitioning of the country
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She now says she knows nothing about it ? Hmm not like Susan Rice to tell lies to the public is it ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gorsich does not appear so conservative or objectionable to the Democrats and they would be foolish to Filibuster and force a rule change for Supreme Court nominees at this point. You would think they would not allow the Nuclear Option to be imposed at this time. It should be saved for a later appointment that may prove more objectionable in the future IMHO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So why in the hell is the left so pissed off. Can't handle the truth, or can't handle the fact that Trump was the one bringing it?
NSA and CIA are my number one and two suspects.
makes watergate look pathetic by comparison
I think the DNC is trying to deflect the nation's attention away from the fact they lost not just this election but they have been effectively booted out of relevancy they lost a tremendous amount of power during the riegn of Barry I..they stole the nomination and Hilary's and Obama are corrupt to the core..they are trying their damnedest to turn the country to hate Trump...they don't have a vision to offer america except hatred for Trump....we are on the verge of unmasking the shadow goverment that controls the world and if Trump keeps going the elite stand to lose their power...and now with Le Pen's strong showing in France the whole house of cards could come tumbeling down.The left is the mask for the global elite.
And the media is trying to hide it. Cernovich, that reported the story yesterday, said he got it from people at Bloomberg and NYTimes that would not report it.
After all Barrak Hussien used the IRS to target his political enemies,it only stands to reason that his administration would use the CIA to do the same.
- Status