blatant corruption is ignored ,while the DNC and the GOP play "Get Smart" chasing Natasha and Boris .....Shouldn't be surprised I guess - lock up all these criminals already - enough is enough
Obama library snatches Susan Rice unmasking docs – for 5 years!
Trump's own National Security Council blocks access to possible spying evidence
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/obama-library-nabs-susan-rice-unmasking-docs-for-5-years/
This is all their faults and ours for letting them spin it that way! They are not presidential notes they are evidence!!!!Shouldn't be surprised I guess - lock up all these criminals already - enough is enough
Obama library snatches Susan Rice unmasking docs – for 5 years!
Trump's own National Security Council blocks access to possible spying evidence
http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/obama-library-nabs-susan-rice-unmasking-docs-for-5-years/
http://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/06/clint-eastwood-dead-death-hoax-how-old-is/Clint Eastwood rides off into sunset. Godspeed.
Isn't this like the third time people are saying he passed?
Thought I remembered something like that. Thanks for the update.http://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/06/clint-eastwood-dead-death-hoax-how-old-is/
Clint Eastwood Death Hoax Hits Twitter
A Clint Eastwood death hoax has hit Twitter. An apparent fake news site that is meant to look like CNN reported that the 87-year-old actor died after suffering a heart attack. The site claims that someone called 911 to report an “unresponsive male” at Eastwood’s home.
The actor, who just celebrated his birthday three weeks ago, is believed to be alive and well.
The site, called CNN-Global News, spelled Los Angeles incorrectly (“Las Angeles”) in its first line of reporting. At the bottom of the article, the site uploaded a variety of celebrity tweets, claiming that these were reactions to Eastwood’s passing.
The first one claims to belong to actor Tom Hanks. It reads, “I am lost for words. Some people you just assume with be with you forever. #ClintEastwood.” The date on the tweet is June 19, 2017. However, if you look at Hanks’ Twitter account, his last tweet was posted on June 15, 2017, and has nothing to do with anyone’s death.
The next tweet listed claims to be from Leonardo DiCaprio’s account. It reads, “The world just lost a remarkable savant. I will miss our all night conversations, sipping whiskey and smoking cigars until the sun came up.” Although Leo has been tweeting today, his posts have been focused on saving the ocean.
It appears as though the tweets posted by CNN-Global News have been fabricated in an effort to help validate and spread the rumors. A quick search of these celebrity Twitter pages, however, helps to debunk the story.
This is not the first time that Eastwood has fallen victim to an internet death hoax. Just last month, fake news that the actor “died of natural causes” at his home in Brentwood surfaced. That particular article referred to Eastwood as a “conservative icon” and talks about Eastwood’s “hatred for snowflakes.” Popular death-hoax-debunking site, Snopes, was quick to report that Eastwood did not die last month. It’s only a matter of time before the site posts an update to cover today’s bogus trend.
I understand that Arleigh Burke class ships have a somewhat reduced radar cross-section, but "like a rowboat"? Color me skeptical.Tough to blame the container ship for not seeing a destroyer with the Fitzgerlad's radar signature designed to make it appear like a rowboat
What poor conditions? It was night time, but my understanding is that the weather clear.until they were right on top of it in poor conditions.
You seem to be contradicting yourself here. If they can see other traffic within 150 miles (sounds high to me, 'cause that's way, way, way over the horizon) then they'd have far more than a "short time" to react.Since they are playing at War tactics, the way the Fitzgerald would remain stealthy is to secure her radars so she was not emitting any EMF frequencies that would give away her position and rely on passive systems like passive sonar & LIDAR to track vessels in the immediate area. Both systems should have given them ample warning of a conflict within 150 miles, but with conditions being what they were, if the attention of only two crewmembers was diverted for any reason even for a short time it could have easily caused the disaster.
You got me - that was an exaggeration. Supposed to appear approximately size of "a small pleasure craft" according to reports I read in Popular Science years ago.I understand that Arleigh Burke class ships have a somewhat reduced radar cross-section, but "like a rowboat"? Color me skeptical.
Initial reports in Fox News Report I read mentioned poor visibility conditions. (I wasn't there, so don't know.)What poor conditions? It was night time, but my understanding is that the weather clear.
I was referring to a combination of passive SONAR & LIDAR. Passive SONAR can easily detect & provide relatively accurate positions/ranging of vessels way, way, way over the horizon while at EMCON. As range closes to LOS, LIDAR is employed to more accurately paint a position for targeting/verification purposes.You seem to be contradicting yourself here. If they can see other traffic within 150 miles (sounds high to me, 'cause that's way, way, way over the horizon) then they'd have far more than a "short time" to react.
it blocks the people's access, it blocks access through the freedom of information act...it allows the political class to cover their own lies.It does seem like a sneaky move pushing Lynch's documents to the obummer liberry. Not sure it makes too much difference though, it blocks foia access but I don't think it blocks congressional subpoena or POTUS request.
Fixed that for ya!It does seem like asneakymoveBlatantly Criminal Obstruction of Justice and a Violation of National Security Handling of Classified Material pushing Lynch's documents to the obummer liberry. Not sure it makes too much difference though, it blocks foia access but I don't think it blocks congressional subpoena or POTUS request.
Poor woman..So imagined this headline differently.
View attachment 84936