Well you have always seemed to insist that prohibition was full on wrong. You further express distrust of the government in solving problems. This kind of ties the two aspects together in that it shows the government using prohibition to not solve a problem, at least not one the people saw as a problem, it does show though the gov using one problem to solve one they had. They could experiment and kill people by saying they had no right to help yet still maintaining the right to cause prohibition, ergo, black markets and the problem.
It's kind of along the lines of the vaping regs we've all here faced. A possibility of full on prohibition existed. It still may exist if some have their way. Then, we could wind up with a black market the same as was set up back when booze got prohibited. Figured that would catch your interest a bit along the lines of "see? History does repeat itself." Seems the fascist scum lack ingenuity in the use of the Hegelian dialectic to 1. create problem, 2. stimulate reaction, 3. sell pre-made solution.
i guess when all you have are hammers for tools, every problem becomes a nail. *shrugs*
As for me, well, today I got a fair start upon setting up a mission. Will not discuss it much beyond the fact that it involves me completely re-framing a lot in order to create my own solutions. Got the mission underway today and will be working daily on it, even if only for a hour a day at a time. I will get to a better point. i've got that much secured.