Nooooooooope.Anyone faced a problem with 510 connection of rx200? Like not making connection or ohm jumping, or 510 pin pushed down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nooooooooope.Anyone faced a problem with 510 connection of rx200? Like not making connection or ohm jumping, or 510 pin pushed down.
V3 made a great mod even better.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
Except for the amp limit. That's annoyingThe board is the same as the rx
Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
The amp limit is strange. Having a 25 amp limit on the input is a reasonable limit (most people use 20 amp CDR 18650's). Having it on the output side of the chip in a 200 watt mod is the strange part. The chip should be stepping down the voltage and stepping up the current .Except for the amp limit. That's annoying
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The amp limit is strange. Having a 25 amp limit on the input is a reasonable limit (most people use 20 amp CDR 18650's). Having it on the output side of the chip in a 200 watt mod is the strange part. The chip should be stepping down the voltage and stepping up the current .
I have them both, and I like both the RX200, and the Cuboid. Both devices have been upgraded to the latest firmware. I thought the Cuboid's firmware limiting settings to 25 amps was going to be an issue for me. It really isn't a big deal unless your constantly vaping below .15 ohms, and like high wattage. My average build is around .22 ohms, and the Cuboid can push it to about 138 watts. Battery life is definitely better on the RX200 because of the extra battery.The temp control is better on the Cuboid. The Cuboid allows you to set both the temperature, and wattage in TC mode. The Cuboid is smoother in TC than the RX200. The RX200 TC is in no way bad, you just feel it cutting the power on and off to control the temperature. The RX200 is more capable in power mode, just because of the third battery. The RX200 can push a .1 build to 200 watts with no problem. A .1 on a Cuboid is going to 62.5 watts max. The Cuboid does a better job at TC. I like both of these MODS. It would be hard to recommend one over the other without knowing how you're going to primarily use the MOD. I would have no hesitation recommending either of these over a Fuchai. If you're into TC, I would recommend the Cuboid. If you like doing a lot of different builds, and having a lot of push to push them, the RX200 is a better choice. If you like running over 80 watts the RX200 can do it all day. If you only like dealing with two batteries, or only have a 2 bay charger, I would recommend the Cuboid. At under $40, your're not going to be disappointed in either of the two MODs.Guys need your advice, between rx200, and cuboid, the downside for me concerning rx200 that it's TC seems not accurate, and not sure if it's pocket friendly or not. Concerning cuboid downside the amp limit, that it won't give even above 100w with certain ohms. I need battery life, power, a working TC device, and a device i can take anywhere. So what is your recommendations? Thank you.
That is exactly what it does. It will output 50A continuous at maximum and 55A peek.
The temp control is better on the Cuboid. The Cuboid allows you to set both the temperature, and wattage in TC mode.
Definitely an upgrade over my Xtar VC4 which was great until I have to charge 3 batteries at a time and it dropped down to 0.5 amp and took a long time. Just charged my 3 Samsung 3000 mah batts in the blu6 at 1 amp and it only took 1.2 hours.
How do you get to the watts in temp mode on the RX200? We keep thinking it should be there because the firmware is so similar on the two devices.You can change watts and temp degrees separately on the rx 200 in temp mode.
How do you get to the watts in temp mode on the RX200? We keep thinking it should be there because the firmware is so similar on the two devices.
page 2 of the users manualHow do you get to the watts in temp mode on the RX200? We keep thinking it should be there because the firmware is so similar on the two devices.
Yeah, depending on which firmware you have loaded. 4 clicks for the newest firmware and I can't remember the old one... 3 clicks?
Does anyone know the relationship between the Joyetech TCR values and temp sensing? Another way to ask the same question would be; If you lower the TCR value setting for a wire, Is it lowering the degrees per ohm of change, or is it lowering the ohms per degree of change?It was always that way. The only thing changed on the menu (besides fonts) during all of the firmware versions was 3.0 changed the three click TC menu. Now you can scroll through all of the different NI, Ti, SS TC modes plus user changeable M1, M2, M3, TCR values.
Does anyone know the relationship between the Joyetech TCR values and temp sensing?
I haven't played much with the TCR settings. I had found an article on wake and vape explaining TCR using; "The TCR of pure Nickel is approximately 0.006. This means that for every °C hotter a Ni200 wire gets, its resistance rises by (0.006 * <starting resistance>)Ω. So for a coil that starts at 1.0Ω, every degree °C of heating will increase its resistance by 0.006Ω (0.006 *1). For a coil that starts at 0.1Ω, each degree will increase resistance by 0.0006Ω (0.006 * 0.1)". -link below. Your chart is much more useful. Is there anything to be gained by tweaking TCR, for instance the Default SS/vs M1 with custom TCR's , can you tell a difference?Lowering the TCR value tells the mod that the wire changes resistance less with changing temp than before.
That's the reason I just recently started using SS430 instead of 316L in TC. With more resistance change, it should be more accurate. The TCR is so low with 316L, I think it makes it very finicky in TC. So far I have been very happy with SS430 in TC.Lowering the TCR value tells the mod that the wire changes resistance less with changing temp than before.
The way I see it, you would tweak the TCR if you are not getting your expected results at your usual set temperature. Lets say you usually use 450F, but with a certain wire the vape is too hot. You would lower the TCR to make it cooler at the same set temperature. Just another way to adjust, you could also just lower your set temperature.I haven't played much with the TCR settings. I had found an article on wake and vape explaining TCR using; "The TCR of pure Nickel is approximately 0.006. This means that for every °C hotter a Ni200 wire gets, its resistance rises by (0.006 * <starting resistance>)Ω. So for a coil that starts at 1.0Ω, every degree °C of heating will increase its resistance by 0.006Ω (0.006 *1). For a coil that starts at 0.1Ω, each degree will increase resistance by 0.0006Ω (0.006 * 0.1)". -link below. Your chart is much more useful. Is there anything to be gained by tweaking TCR for instance the Default SS/vs M1 with custom TCR's , can you tell a difference?
http://www.wakeandvape.com/blog/temperature-control-and-rdas-in-vapes/
Lets say you usually use 450F, but with a certain wire the vape is too hot. You would lower the TCR to make it cooler at the same set temperature. Just another way to adjust, you could also just lower your set temperature.
That's the reason I just recently started using SS430 instead of 316L in TC. With more resistance change, it should be more accurate. The TCR is so low with 316L, I think it makes it very finicky in TC. So far I have been very happy with SS430 in TC.
Cheers,
Steve
I bought it from Unkamen Supplies. They are located in Missouri. Very good experience with them. I ordered it Tuesday evening, they shipped it Wednesday, it arrived on Friday. Here's the link if your interested.Hey Wings where did you get the SS430 from? Had the same issue as you did with the 316L. Just vaped it in Watts.
Hey Wings where did you get the SS430 from? Had the same issue as you did with the 316L. Just vaped it in Watts.
What tcr are you using on the DNA for it?I bought it from Unkamen Supplies. They are located in Missouri. Very good experience with them. I ordered it Tuesday evening, they shipped it Wednesday, it arrived on Friday. Here's the link if your interested.
Cheers,
Steve
I set up two different profiles. One with a TCR of .00138, the other with the SS430 CSV file I downloaded from Steam Engine. I find the curve to be working just fine.What tcr are you using on the DNA for it?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My Crown Vapes fine on the RX with the SS coils and the 3.0 upgrade.
Grazie!I set up two different profiles. One with a TCR of .00138, the other with the SS430 CSV file I downloaded from Steam Engine. I find the curve to be working just fine.
Cheers,
Steve
Edit Here's a link to the CSV file on Steam Engine.
I have 4 Crowns. I never knew until a few weeks ago that the standard coils are SS. I usually Vape ni200 exclusively. I have been vaping the SS coils on the RX at 60w and around 470f. The taste is really nice and clean with good Vapor production.That is what some others have said too. I would think the temp range would be almost double or worse. So does 400°F setting vape like 400°F? And 500°F setting vape like 500°F? Funny I have a Crown (another one coming tomorrow) and I have never used those prebuilt SS coils yet (just the Ni200). Plus I have two RX mods. I finally got one Crown RBA yesterday (haven't used it yet), one more coming tomorrow, and one more from China that I ordered like a month ago (without tracking).
No problem at all buddy. I edited the post to include instructions how to get the file. I doubt you need them, but on the off chance you might find them helpful, here they are:Grazie!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Has anyone put electrical tape on the screen ribbon like some recommend on the RX200 to get it out of the way of the fire button? I wasn't going to bother unless I started seeing some ribbon cable failures.
I could be wrong, but I thought that was for the early DNA200 versions of the Reuleaux. If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will be along soon to let me know lmao . Just messing around with the last part.Has anyone put electrical tape on the screen ribbon like some recommend on the RX200 to get it out of the way of the fire button? I wasn't going to bother unless I started seeing some ribbon cable failures.
What mod are you using? If the RX200, the firmware 1.08 and 3.00 is supposed to be set for 316L on SS. Before that it was set for 304 SS. If you use something like those Uwell Crown prebuilt 0.25 and 0.50 coils using 316L SS, they use nickel legs and throws off the TCR.
As some may know I did purchase a second RX200 with a Crown Tank. Picked it up at a local vape shop for near VaporDNA pricing. Paid for one battery, got the other two free with two free 30mil bottles of juice and four free beers.
The second RX200 has acted a lot better than the first one did. Now that I feel I have two working right I feel the TC is still a botch job. Does not matter what tank, coils, setting or juice I use. The vape in TC is always dry with at least one pretty big pulse concerning temp.
Go for the RX200 as for a DNA200 you might want to checkout the Lavabox by Volcano.I'm debating in getting the rx200 or the dna200 I can't sleep this is all I think about which fucking one I get?? I'm leaning on the dna200 clearly because I heard how amazing it is and blah blah blah
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
I didn't like the idea of the DNA version chewing up battery wraps as that is just going to lead to a quick battery failure.If you're into TC, crazy builds, custom screens, and tinkering around with escribe then get the DNA. If all those things are not important to you get the RX.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
The RX200 is dead on accurate for TC if you've been told differently from somebody they are either lying or misinformed.Guys need your advice, between rx200, and cuboid, the downside for me concerning rx200 that it's TC seems not accurate, and not sure if it's pocket friendly or not. Concerning cuboid downside the amp limit, that it won't give even above 100w with certain ohms. I need battery life, power, a working TC device, and a device i can take anywhere. So what is your recommendations? Thank you.
Whoa dude what the holy fruitcake is that?Or you could get one of these.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
I only have 1 issue with mine it now has a very small dent on the top due to a fall when I sneezed while removing cells...Damn it.Gotcha. Mine has been fine for two months with nary a glitch. Haven't heard of too many people having issues.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk