Vapers who don't live outside forums don't live in reality. To think an Internet personality has any weight concerning public policy and regulations is as silly as thinking K. kardashian has any, as well. The federal government isn't going to ban fatty foods, just because she has a huge ass from eating it...
As trollish as this statement is, I share that sentiment. I think people who are deeply integrated into social circles on the internet tend to overestimate the importance of the happenings on the internet that pertain to real-world things. It's not as relevant as people seem to think it is. If it was, then people would either know about it, or at least be able to acknowledge the resultant changes that they see in the world and maybe even how they live their lives.
I'm reminded of the whole SJW craze and the mobs of internet activists who think that what they're saying and doing about very big, real-world problems via the internet is affecting things in a big and meaningful way.
All that the internet does is bring people with similar viewpoints together. It's merely the shadow of the things happening around us.
And that's the thing. 9 out of 10 people on the street, if asked about these huge internet movements, wouldn't know a thing about them and probably wouldn't see anything of the changes they claim to be bringing.
The people working against us on the internet will look to the internet for things to use against us... ...on the internet. This only affects people who actually follow these things on the internet, i.e., the ones who have already made up their minds and become invested enough in the issue to take the time...
The ones in the real world wouldn't write an article or do a report on rip trippers, as most people wouldn't recognize him. The public reaction to it would be minimal. They would be better off interviewing local families and experts. They'll instead write a story about a mech mod exploding, a new study or survey done, new legislation being pushed... ...things that the unindicted public can immediately grok and see as legitimate. They couldn't give one, let alone two fucks about youtube drama because they know that the only people who do are the ones who already follow it online.
Legislators are looking at studies and monetary figures, not youtube videos or even public opinion.
That's what I think. I'm trying to keep it all in perspective, here.