I hear ya, W2k was solid. Otherwise known as NT5. ;-)
I run Mint with Cinnamon on my old laptop, but it rarely gets used.
Yep. NT4, server and workstation, were pretty decent at their respective roles, albeit a pain to get setup. After Microsoft ripped off Novell and released server 2000 with active directory, and eventually got the client side pointed in the right direction with SP2 (what a debacle that first release was), it became most of what everybody wished NT could be. I ran 2KSP4 on my beloved
FRANKENBOX looooong after XP was around.
It was stable, fast and compatible with everything I cared about. I could tweak that OS down to a grand total of 16 running processes, which was perfect for the benchmark wars of the time. Like stripping a car of everything not absolutely essential for it to run when converting it into a dragster.
2000 I think will always be my favorite Windows OS. 95c was OK for the home user, as was 98SE (also known as 95d
) ME was a Hindenburg level disaster, XP wound up being alright and had a decent 13 year run. Vista was a horrible prematurely released Windows 7.
7, being what Vista should have been, was/is still a pretty respectable OS overall, but everything since then has seen Microsoft become openly guilty of most of what their virulent detractors have been accusing them of for years.
Make no mistake about it. All this "Microsoft "account" and "cloud everything" from them, while yes, providing some convenience, is ALL about getting the OS (and thereby everything else) off the local machine and into their server farms where they can most effectively control piracy. Their vision of the future is a world full of Citrix style client terminals with EVERYthing else on their servers.
Doubt that?
Google "Microsoft palladium"
They've been trying it for years, but palladium was too flagrant and abrupt in the early 2000s, so they wised up and instead are using the boiling frog method of getting people accustomed to having their stuff on Microsoft's servers. It's not that they want people's data. They couldn't care less about anybody's documents, pictures and music. They want ironfisted control over software that WE are paying THEM for. It's the principle of the thing. They are NOT doin it to me.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled thread LOL!