Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
LMFAO - how did i miss this beauty of a "post"


Whatever you want to say triggered one.

You act like i care that you blocked me. I find it very VERY amusing. Tell yourself whatever you have to in order to feel better... no skin off my back.


Look at who is projecting here.


LoL BRING IT! Clearly you do not have any of my information, and i know 100% fact you cannot have all my information EVEN if you have a "friend" in the government...(btw you dont know who you are talking to either :D ) If you had any of my information you would know better :p


No i am dealing with a peacock fluffing up feathers trying to be big and scary.


Again you do not know anything. Want to talk about ignorance.... the garbage you have spewed out in this post alone is enough to laugh at for a week.


Note the guys you are arguing with have been on my nuts since i posted in this thread... Their opinion of me matters as much as your opinion matters.



Because you need a safe space, cannot control when you reply to someone who you claim is being a troll. Call me what you want, just because i think your opinions are ludicrous and delusional conspiracy theories does not make me a troll.

Im sure you have already ignored me, so let one of your minions inform you that i have responded to your ridiculous post... Talk about a joke. All talk, that is all you are.
Jesus wept.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
It isn't amazing. You make your ignorance known every time you post.
Do you actually know what a fallacy is? LOL
Bet your boyfriend told you to use it 'cause it's a big word.

You've now served your bit of usefulness..Run along, back in the killfile

He does know what a "fallacy" is, he just spelled it wrong. He meant "phallically". He has Penis envy. :huh::huh:
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I beg to both agree and disagree.
I understand that we have the right to assemble but I also know that at this point in time
that right will only accomplish getting media attention.

You also know that defending said right from black clad activists is not our job
it is the job of law enforcement. You also know that it seems law enforcement
is not doing or is being prevented from doing their job.
Have you asked yourself why?

You know as does pulsevape that the DNC was shown by O'Keefe to be paying thugs to disrupt
Trump rallies and it follows that the same people being paid are still being payed to disrupt
conservative political events. You may recall
that I FORWARDED THE VIDEO TO Shawn Hannity...so I don't need PV reminding me of that.

You may recall that I also posted about the ads to hire "crisis actors" being paid for b organizations funded by Soros.
You need not remind me that Antifa ETC are a paid organized effort to undermine our Republic.

I now remind you what the purpose of said paid agitation is/was.
Was it to instigate revolt? To violate our right to assemble? To stifle our free speech?
NO.
The purpose was to turn it around and blame Trump and his supporters.

Now ask whether you really think those black clad antifa social warriors are going to take any of our freedom
or actually just inconvenience a few people who feel the need to attend a pep rally...
The mayors, governors, police, ETC all know if the (armed) right wing decides to fight those antifa dudes
we would win.
But does anybody care whether we would win or lose a few street fights?
No.
What they care about is that if there's enough people fighting in the streets
DISOBEYING the law, ARMED, they are all subject to being labeled enemy combatants
and being arrested and held w/o benefit of trial or other constitutional guarantees and rights.

I know you @Time understand the above and think you as opposed to some of our colleagues
don't need to be an armchair or any type of warrior to know you still have nuts...

As far as being AFRAID...
While it seems some keyboard warriors have decided to confuse my common sense
and INTELLIGENCE for cowardice nothing could be further from the truth.

I am not afraid for myself..I'm afraid for the old men running their fingers.
I'm afraid for the big mouths who think running their mouth will cause an armed
SWAT guy from standing down and think about the Bill of Rights.
I'm afraid for the United States of America because I *know* that we have enemies way more dangerous than antifa
or BLM who are setting us up so they can steal our freedom.

If over a hundred years worth of underhanded nefarious interference in the affairs of sovereign nations
hasn't given some of y'all a clue that we're not playing a game where all the good tin soldiers wearing blue uniforms
line up with their muskets in front of a bunch of other soldiers dressed in red and shoot it out
while some guys in funny hats miles away from the skirmish decide who dies next
then I'm indeed wasting my time trying to make the point that cowardice and valor or patriotism has little to do with any of this other
than those things being qualities for the puppet masters to exploit.

I understand your point, I just don't agree.

Either people stand up to the leftist thugs, or they don't. If they don't, like any bully, the leftist terrorists will continue. That's not acceptable.

Sure, doing something might bring some backlash. It's a worth the risk. Fuck them punks. Besides, most people actually forget or don't know that when those who are considered right wing wack jobs clash with the government, the so called wack jobs usually win in court. Ruby Ridge, Waco, and more recently the Bundy's Oregon ordeal, all won in court.

And relax a bit. I didn't use the word "afraid" as in "scared". It was used in a different context like, I'm afraid you misunderstood what I meant when I used the word afraid. LOL.


  • worried that something undesirable will occur or be done.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I understand your point, I just don't agree.

Either people stand up to the leftist thugs, or they don't. If they don't, like any bully, the leftist terrorists will continue. That's not acceptable.

Sure, doing something might bring some backlash. It's a worth the risk. Fuck them punks. Besides, most people actually forget or don't know that when those who are considered right wing wack jobs clash with the government, the so called wack jobs usually win in court. Ruby Ridge, Waco, and more recently the Bundy's Oregon ordeal, all won in court.

And relax a bit. I didn't use the word "afraid" as in "scared". It was used in a different context like, I'm afraid you misunderstood what I meant when I used the word afraid. LOL.


  • worried that something undesirable will occur or be done.

Only time will tell (no pun intended) whether my caution is correct.
I understand your point also and would agree if not for that
now-a-days when a kid stands up to a bully in school the kid gets in worse trouble than the bully
and the bully might get counseling.
Applied to the bigger world, everybody gets in trouble...but nothing gets solved.

There are legal remedies to acts like blocking events and assaulting the people attending.
I realize that the cops aren't doing jack..so one should take the complaint higher.

I also know, as I've painfully elaborated on that
the powers that be are itching for an excuse to declare martial law.

Finally, perhaps my age has made me more cautious. Where I once
ran to a fight in order to defend my rights and/or honor
I now stop to weigh the pros and cons of engagement and have come to the conclusion
that there's little to inspire me to not turn around and walk away laughing
and even less to motivate me into going to a pep rally in the first place.

Of course, should I encounter sticks and stones while in the course of going about my daily business
then...Fear not my friend. "Today is as good a day to die as any."
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Only time will tell (no pun intended) whether my caution is correct.
I understand your point also and would agree if not for that
now-a-days when a kid stands up to a bully in school the kid gets in worse trouble than the bully
and the bully might get counseling.
Applied to the bigger world, everybody gets in trouble...but nothing gets solved.

There are legal remedies to acts like blocking events and assaulting the people attending.
I realize that the cops aren't doing jack..so one should take the complaint higher.

I also know, as I've painfully elaborated on that
the powers that be are itching for an excuse to declare martial law.

Finally, perhaps my age has made me more cautious. Where I once
ran to a fight in order to defend my rights and/or honor
I now stop to weigh the pros and cons of engagement and have come to the conclusion
that there's little to inspire me to not turn around and walk away laughing
and even less to motivate me into going to a pep rally in the first place.

Of course, should I encounter sticks and stones while in the course of going about my daily business
then...Fear not my friend. "Today is as good a day to die as any."
Yeah ideally 'd like to see Jeff Sessions sue the Mayor of Berkeley for not providing equal protecton, and have him sue the University of Berkeley for violating students civil liberties...this way violence could be avoided, but really think about it....not a single politician in the state of California has even condemed what is going on much less propose something be done about it...
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Only time will tell (no pun intended) whether my caution is correct.
I understand your point also and would agree if not for that
now-a-days when a kid stands up to a bully in school the kid gets in worse trouble than the bully
and the bully might get counseling.
Applied to the bigger world, everybody gets in trouble...but nothing gets solved.

There are legal remedies to acts like blocking events and assaulting the people attending.
I realize that the cops aren't doing jack..so one should take the complaint higher.

I also know, as I've painfully elaborated on that
the powers that be are itching for an excuse to declare martial law.

Finally, perhaps my age has made me more cautious. Where I once
ran to a fight in order to defend my rights and/or honor
I now stop to weigh the pros and cons of engagement and have come to the conclusion
that there's little to inspire me to not turn around and walk away laughing
and even less to motivate me into going to a pep rally in the first place.

Of course, should I encounter sticks and stones while in the course of going about my daily business
then...Fear not my friend. "Today is as good a day to die as any."

There is no rule of law thus there is no law and law enforcement picks and chooses when to enforce or not enforce. They are choosing to enforce for the left not against the left. There are no dead leftist terrorists from any of the violent "protests" but there are dead protesters of the right.

There are no legal remedies when law enforcement only acts against one side.

I've often wondered when the "right" is going to get over their love affair for law enforcement that continually exert unlawful "justice" against them and their interests. If law enforcement does not uphold the constitution when it should but kills for unfounded reasons as determined many times in court, then fuck them too. They can be treated the same way as the leftist terrorists.
 

Dead Gummy Worm

Silver Contributor
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
ECF Refugee
He does know what a "fallacy" is, he just spelled it wrong. He meant "phallically". He has Penis envy. :huh::huh:
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. As your lil nut swinger says "stop projecting"
 

Dead Gummy Worm

Silver Contributor
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
ECF Refugee
Jesus wept.
At what, how many times that wanabe claimed to be able to do something he CANNOT? or at his internet toughguy attitude trying to scare me with his internet skills is like an ant trying to scare a foot of a human being....
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
There is no rule of law thus there is no law and law enforcement picks and chooses when to enforce or not enforce. They are choosing to enforce for the left not against the left. There are no dead leftist terrorists from any of the violent "protests" but there are dead protesters of the right.

There are no legal remedies when law enforcement only acts against one side.

I've often wondered when the "right" is going to get over their love affair for law enforcement that continually exert unlawful "justice" against them and their interests. If law enforcement does not uphold the constitution when it should but kills for unfounded reasons as determined many times in court, then fuck them too. They can be treated the same way as the leftist terrorists.
Sometimes I think Pat Buchanan has it right....that the divisions are too wide to be bridged...and that Balkanization of ethnic and cultural groups is not only inevitable but preferable...and perhaps that is why the globalist used the DNC in 1965 to push for the invasion of illiterate poor third worlders through "immigration reform" ,,,to divide the country so that it would cease to be as powerfull on the world conciousness than it has been...
 

Dead Gummy Worm

Silver Contributor
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
ECF Refugee
tank-driver-fail-rollover.jpg
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He-He-He...
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...st-punish-universities-indulging-student-mob?
Congress needs to mandate larger penalties for public universities that indulge the student-radical mob.
by David French April 24, 2017
Congress needs to mandate larger penalties for public universities that indulge the student-radical mob. The courts have failed. The culture is failing. Unless Congress acts, we may lose not only free speech on college campuses, but free speech in America. In the memorable phrase of my friend, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education president Greg Lukianoff, college students are “unlearning liberty,” carrying the virus of censorship and oppression beyond the university and into the nation. The courts are failing not because the underlying legal doctrines are flawed but because the remedies for censorship are completely inadequate. As of right now, there is a far greater financial incentive for a university to keep its sidewalks shoveled in the winter than to protect one of our nation’s founding liberties. If a student slips and breaks an arm, they stand to win much larger damages in court than a professor denied a promotion because of his speech or a student group thrown off campus merely because it’s Christian. As it is, students and professors can launch exhausting legal cases, fight the university tooth-and-nail through years of depositions, motions, trials, and appeals, and at the end of the ordeal win an injunction and attorneys’ fees. In one memorable case, I fought a university for more than seven years and won a week-long jury trial, only for my client to be awarded a total (including attorneys’ fees) of far, far less than $1 million. Universities are some of the richest institutions in American life. These dollar amounts are utterly meaningless to their bottom lines. It’s worth achieving individual justice in individual cases, but even the strongest precedent ends up providing only a minimal deterrent effect, especially when compared to the overwhelming cultural pressure for more censorship, more thought control, and less tolerance of even the most reasonable dissenting voices on campus. The New York Times today published an op-ed that provided a public window into the kinds of free-speech arguments that dominate campus discourse. The piece, by Ulrich Baer, a vice provost at New York University, argues that restricting speech that “invalidate the humanity of some people” is a “public good.” It’s necessary to translate Left-speak to understand what it means to “invalidate the humanity of some people.” In real terms, it doesn’t mean belonging to the KKK, it means nothing more than merely disagreeing with racial and sexual identity politics. So, if you’re Heather Mac Donald and believe that radical anti-police rhetoric and actions from Black Lives Matters is actually costing black lives, then you’re (in the words of activists at Claremont Pomona college) questioning “the right of Black people to exist.” If you’re Charles Murray, and you’ve come to campus to discuss the class divisions that are causing America to “come apart,” a mob can and will shut you down. Here’s Baer, with words that should chill every American heart: The idea of freedom of speech does not mean a blanket permission to say anything anybody thinks. It means balancing the inherent value of a given view with the obligation to ensure that other members of a given community can participate in discourse as fully recognized members of that community. Free-speech protections — not only but especially in universities, which aim to educate students in how to belong to various communities — should not mean that someone’s humanity, or their right to participate in political speech as political agents, can be freely attacked, demeaned or questioned. In other words, campus radicals will let you speak only when they deem your speech is worthy. And if they don’t? Then, the mob isn’t a mob, it’s a collection of idealists “keeping watch over the soul of our republic.” Enough. We cannot count on campus administrators to protect free speech. They’re so terrified of the radicals that they’re more prone to apologize for free speech, arguably our nation’s most essential liberty, than they are to defend it. Witness Berkeley bowing before the mob time and again. Witness the groveling apology from the chairman of Middlebury’s political-science department to the campus community. A mob attacked and wounded a member of the faculty, and this man actually said that his decision to offer a “symbolic department co-sponsorship” of the event at which that attack occurred contributed to a “feeling of voicelessness” that “many” allegedly experience on campus. Their voices seemed plenty loud when they violently shut down Murray’s speech. If we can’t count on courts or colleges to protect free speech, then it’s time for Congress to step up. There’s a remarkably simple solution to the problem of free speech, at least on public university campuses: Adjust the incentives. Make it costlier to censor than to protect the Constitution. At public universities, campus censors have the freedom to speak, but they do not have the freedom to oppress. All it would take is a law holding that if a court of final jurisdiction finds that a public university has violated the constitutional rights of a student or faculty member, then the university will pay liquidated damages to the plaintiff in the amount of no less than $5 million. It will also forfeit 25 percent of its federal funding in that current fiscal year. If a university is a repeat offender at any point in the five years following, it will forfeit 100 percent of its federal funding in that fiscal year. Here’s what will happen: Universities will respond with all the energy and fury of a person experiencing an electric shock. The rule of law will be restored, and our essential liberties will be protected anew. Does all this sound draconian? It’s not. The primary task of any public official in the United States is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It doesn’t matter how well you perform your secondary role, whether it’s governing a state, distributing drivers’ licenses, or even teaching biology — if you fail in the primary task of preserving our constitutional republic, you have no business calling yourself a public servant. Furthermore, such a strong political statement in favor of free speech will have a potent cultural effect. Private universities that choose to maintain totalitarian enclaves will face powerful market pressures from more-free and less-expensive public universities, and the contrast between liberty and oppression will be made clear for all to see. (It’s worth noting, too, that private universities are not immune from civil law. Mob violence is just as unlawful on private property as it is on a public campus, and law enforcement cannot and must not stand aside when radicals riot.) At public universities, campus censors have the freedom to speak, but they do not have the freedom to oppress. Constitutional protections are meaningless if the law can’t provide an adequate remedy for their infringement. It’s time to change the calculus. It’s time to crush campus censorship. — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney. READ MORE The Battle of Berkeley Prosecute the Rioters: Sedition Law Must Be Enforced If We Can’t Unite Against Rioting, We Can’t Unite at All
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
This is a fascinating article in the sense I'm surprised anyone would publish it...it's really worth reading...It tells the story of how the elite and upper middle class of france is betraying the working class french, to muslims all for the price of cheap labor....how globalization has decimated the working class of France and profited the upper middle class and the muslim immigrants and the french working class are the ones suffering from globalization, and why it is the working class of france that support Le Pen and the upper middle class who support leftist/globalist agenda.It is all to familiar of America. as well.This movment was clearly seen just recently when the DNC nominated their new Chairman, and many of the candidates to chair the DNC openly said that here was no place for Whites in the DNC leadership...in other words the upper middle class college educated have betrayed and villifyed the white working class over immigrants because they, the upper middle class are profiting from globalization...at the expense of their own nation..

https://www.city-journal.org/html/french-coming-apart-15125.html
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He-He-He...
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...st-punish-universities-indulging-student-mob?
Congress needs to mandate larger penalties for public universities that indulge the student-radical mob.
by David French April 24, 2017
Congress needs to mandate larger penalties for public universities that indulge the student-radical mob. The courts have failed. The culture is failing. Unless Congress acts, we may lose not only free speech on college campuses, but free speech in America. In the memorable phrase of my friend, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education president Greg Lukianoff, college students are “unlearning liberty,” carrying the virus of censorship and oppression beyond the university and into the nation. The courts are failing not because the underlying legal doctrines are flawed but because the remedies for censorship are completely inadequate. As of right now, there is a far greater financial incentive for a university to keep its sidewalks shoveled in the winter than to protect one of our nation’s founding liberties. If a student slips and breaks an arm, they stand to win much larger damages in court than a professor denied a promotion because of his speech or a student group thrown off campus merely because it’s Christian. As it is, students and professors can launch exhausting legal cases, fight the university tooth-and-nail through years of depositions, motions, trials, and appeals, and at the end of the ordeal win an injunction and attorneys’ fees. In one memorable case, I fought a university for more than seven years and won a week-long jury trial, only for my client to be awarded a total (including attorneys’ fees) of far, far less than $1 million. Universities are some of the richest institutions in American life. These dollar amounts are utterly meaningless to their bottom lines. It’s worth achieving individual justice in individual cases, but even the strongest precedent ends up providing only a minimal deterrent effect, especially when compared to the overwhelming cultural pressure for more censorship, more thought control, and less tolerance of even the most reasonable dissenting voices on campus. The New York Times today published an op-ed that provided a public window into the kinds of free-speech arguments that dominate campus discourse. The piece, by Ulrich Baer, a vice provost at New York University, argues that restricting speech that “invalidate the humanity of some people” is a “public good.” It’s necessary to translate Left-speak to understand what it means to “invalidate the humanity of some people.” In real terms, it doesn’t mean belonging to the KKK, it means nothing more than merely disagreeing with racial and sexual identity politics. So, if you’re Heather Mac Donald and believe that radical anti-police rhetoric and actions from Black Lives Matters is actually costing black lives, then you’re (in the words of activists at Claremont Pomona college) questioning “the right of Black people to exist.” If you’re Charles Murray, and you’ve come to campus to discuss the class divisions that are causing America to “come apart,” a mob can and will shut you down. Here’s Baer, with words that should chill every American heart: The idea of freedom of speech does not mean a blanket permission to say anything anybody thinks. It means balancing the inherent value of a given view with the obligation to ensure that other members of a given community can participate in discourse as fully recognized members of that community. Free-speech protections — not only but especially in universities, which aim to educate students in how to belong to various communities — should not mean that someone’s humanity, or their right to participate in political speech as political agents, can be freely attacked, demeaned or questioned. In other words, campus radicals will let you speak only when they deem your speech is worthy. And if they don’t? Then, the mob isn’t a mob, it’s a collection of idealists “keeping watch over the soul of our republic.” Enough. We cannot count on campus administrators to protect free speech. They’re so terrified of the radicals that they’re more prone to apologize for free speech, arguably our nation’s most essential liberty, than they are to defend it. Witness Berkeley bowing before the mob time and again. Witness the groveling apology from the chairman of Middlebury’s political-science department to the campus community. A mob attacked and wounded a member of the faculty, and this man actually said that his decision to offer a “symbolic department co-sponsorship” of the event at which that attack occurred contributed to a “feeling of voicelessness” that “many” allegedly experience on campus. Their voices seemed plenty loud when they violently shut down Murray’s speech. If we can’t count on courts or colleges to protect free speech, then it’s time for Congress to step up. There’s a remarkably simple solution to the problem of free speech, at least on public university campuses: Adjust the incentives. Make it costlier to censor than to protect the Constitution. At public universities, campus censors have the freedom to speak, but they do not have the freedom to oppress. All it would take is a law holding that if a court of final jurisdiction finds that a public university has violated the constitutional rights of a student or faculty member, then the university will pay liquidated damages to the plaintiff in the amount of no less than $5 million. It will also forfeit 25 percent of its federal funding in that current fiscal year. If a university is a repeat offender at any point in the five years following, it will forfeit 100 percent of its federal funding in that fiscal year. Here’s what will happen: Universities will respond with all the energy and fury of a person experiencing an electric shock. The rule of law will be restored, and our essential liberties will be protected anew. Does all this sound draconian? It’s not. The primary task of any public official in the United States is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It doesn’t matter how well you perform your secondary role, whether it’s governing a state, distributing drivers’ licenses, or even teaching biology — if you fail in the primary task of preserving our constitutional republic, you have no business calling yourself a public servant. Furthermore, such a strong political statement in favor of free speech will have a potent cultural effect. Private universities that choose to maintain totalitarian enclaves will face powerful market pressures from more-free and less-expensive public universities, and the contrast between liberty and oppression will be made clear for all to see. (It’s worth noting, too, that private universities are not immune from civil law. Mob violence is just as unlawful on private property as it is on a public campus, and law enforcement cannot and must not stand aside when radicals riot.) At public universities, campus censors have the freedom to speak, but they do not have the freedom to oppress. Constitutional protections are meaningless if the law can’t provide an adequate remedy for their infringement. It’s time to change the calculus. It’s time to crush campus censorship. — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney. READ MORE The Battle of Berkeley Prosecute the Rioters: Sedition Law Must Be Enforced If We Can’t Unite Against Rioting, We Can’t Unite at All
Hell Berkeley even stopped liberal Bill Maher from coming to speak because he questioned the wisdom of allowing massive waves of muslims into America.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
This is a fascinating article in the sense I'm surprised anyone would publish it...it's really worth reading...It tells the story of how the elite and upper middle class of france is betraying the working class french, to muslims all for the price of cheap labor....how globalization has decimated the working class of France and profited the upper middle class and the muslim immigrants and the french working class are the ones suffering from globalization, and why it is the working class of france that support Le Pen and the upper middle class who support leftist/globalist agenda.It is all to familiar of America. as well.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/french-coming-apart-15125.html
Doesn't that sound familiar?
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Hell Berkeley even stopped liberal Bill Maher from coming to speak because he questioned the wisdom of allowing massive waves of muslims into America.
Indeed. At this point I'll point out that even though the mayor is a commie butt fucker
the folks stopping conservative speakers and encouraging the weirdos is the actual UC at Berkely admin and it's professors.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Doesn't that sound familiar?
yeah it do....that's why I thought people might like reading it...it is telling the true story of who is really suffering from globalization and who is profiting from it.and how and why the working class like the people who voted for Trump are being villified....for money.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Speaking of butt fuckers
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/04/isis-gay-porn-hack/
ISIS Vows To Kill Man Who Hacked 250 Jihadi Twitter Accounts & Filled Them With Gay Porn
‘WauchulaGhost’ – the hacker allegedly responsible for hacking more than 250 ISIS Twitter accounts – has received threats of an impending beheading, reports The Sun.

The outlet states that WauchulaGhost decided to target ISIS accounts with the help of his cohorts after realizing somebody had to “stand up” to them following the Orlando nightclub shooting last year.

Speaking with CNN, the anonymous man stated that he has received beheading images and death threats as a result of his actions.

“That’s good because if they are focusing on me they are not doing anything else,” he said, adding that he began his endeavor as a means of trolling ISIS.

“We thought that putting the naked images would offend them.”

If the social media people like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram would stand up and do something it would help,” he continued. “Sometimes you have to stand up and make a change for the good.”

WauchulaGhost also claimed that in a mere 60 seconds, he can crack an ISIS account because most of the Islamic group’s posters have the technical skills of children.

“The taking of innocent lives will not be tolerated,” he reportedly said.

Here's some CNN for you
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Indeed. At this point I'll point out that even though the mayor is a commie butt fucker
the folks stopping conservative speakers and encouraging the weirdos is the actual UC at Berkely admin and it's professors.
yep and the also at the University at Davis California which also shut down the Milo talk...it was the Administration.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
yeah it do....that's why I thought people might like reading it...it is telling the true story of who is really suffering from globalization and who is profiting from it.and how and why the working class like the people who voted for Trump are being villified....for money.
It's neck and neck LePen and Macron..The talking heads say even if Marine loses
she's still a thorn in the EU's side
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Speaking of butt fuckers
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/04/isis-gay-porn-hack/
ISIS Vows To Kill Man Who Hacked 250 Jihadi Twitter Accounts & Filled Them With Gay Porn
‘WauchulaGhost’ – the hacker allegedly responsible for hacking more than 250 ISIS Twitter accounts – has received threats of an impending beheading, reports The Sun.

The outlet states that WauchulaGhost decided to target ISIS accounts with the help of his cohorts after realizing somebody had to “stand up” to them following the Orlando nightclub shooting last year.

Speaking with CNN, the anonymous man stated that he has received beheading images and death threats as a result of his actions.

“That’s good because if they are focusing on me they are not doing anything else,” he said, adding that he began his endeavor as a means of trolling ISIS.

“We thought that putting the naked images would offend them.”

If the social media people like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram would stand up and do something it would help,” he continued. “Sometimes you have to stand up and make a change for the good.”

WauchulaGhost also claimed that in a mere 60 seconds, he can crack an ISIS account because most of the Islamic group’s posters have the technical skills of children.

“The taking of innocent lives will not be tolerated,” he reportedly said.

Here's some CNN for you
no this is great...this is a fun revolution...trolling the shit out of lunatics....
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
It's neck and neck LePen and Macron..The talking heads say even if Marine loses
she's still a thorn in the EU's side

Hard to believe she could have been 4 points up, then wound up 3 points down in the count. Something fishy there. not that it matters beyond a momentum thing. Could make one believe the globalists are leaving nothing to chance in the French election.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

r055co

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
This is a fascinating article in the sense I'm surprised anyone would publish it...it's really worth reading...It tells the story of how the elite and upper middle class of france is betraying the working class french, to muslims all for the price of cheap labor....how globalization has decimated the working class of France and profited the upper middle class and the muslim immigrants and the french working class are the ones suffering from globalization, and why it is the working class of france that support Le Pen and the upper middle class who support leftist/globalist agenda.It is all to familiar of America. as well.This movment was clearly seen just recently when the DNC nominated their new Chairman, and many of the candidates to chair the DNC openly said that here was no place for Whites in the DNC leadership...in other words the upper middle class college educated have betrayed and villifyed the white working class over immigrants because they, the upper middle class are profiting from globalization...at the expense of their own nation..

https://www.city-journal.org/html/french-coming-apart-15125.html
Kinda like what is going on here and numerous other countries. Just look at the consolidation of Food, Energy, Power, Banking and Media.

It's as Daddy Bush said during the first Gulf War, "New World Order".

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Kinda like what is going on here and numerous other countries. Just look at the consolidation of Food, Energy, Power, Banking and Media.

It's as Daddy Bush said during the first Gulf War, "New World Order".

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
A Thousand Points of Lucifer...
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Hard to believe she could have been 4 points up, then wound up 3 points down in the count. Something fishy there. not that it matters beyond a momentum thing. Could make one believe the globalists are leaving nothing to chance in the French election.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Man the globalists are leaving NOTHING to chance. Surreptitious is the operative word.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So,Trump goes back on his promise to stay the hell out of the Syrian decebale ....and can spend the time and money to shoot of a boatload of missles, he can go around spending time and money on playing gunboat diplomacy with NK....but his border wall the centerpiece of his campagin promises he has no time, nor can he afford to spend any energy on....instead he offers vauge promises at a latter date...hmmm sounds alot like the bullshit the RNC promised during the last mid-terms doesn't it.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...-for-country-if-trump-punts-border-wall-fight
 

Dead Gummy Worm

Silver Contributor
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
ECF Refugee
Gosh darn it! I want my instant gratification now!! Deliver all of Trumps promises today OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all know he could just do it all by him self immediately so we should be mad that he hasnt done everythign yet.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I did not vote for this ZIONIST even though I do think she is cute..
She has as much right to be hanging out in the White House
as Obama's momma did, NONE.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-trump-meets-germany-angela-merkel/100873112/
Ivanka Trump visits Berlin for women's forum and gets booed

... While Ivanka Trump praised her father for being a "tremendous champion of supporting families," members of the panel's audience booed and hissed....
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So,Trump goes back on his promise to stay the hell out of the Syrian decebale ....and can spend the time and money to shoot of a boatload of missles, he can go around spending time and money on playing gunboat diplomacy with NK....but his border wall the centerpiece of his campagin promises he has no time, nor can he afford to spend any energy on....instead he offers vauge promises at a latter date...hmmm sounds alot like the bullshit the RNC promised during the last mid-terms doesn't it.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...-for-country-if-trump-punts-border-wall-fight
Keep reading around, he's starting to "reconsider" the wall also
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Y'all need a good laugh? You just can't make up stuff like this, proof God has a sense of humor
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ic-state-position-kill-3-militants/100876844/
Wild boars overrun Islamic State position, kill 3 militants
John Bacon , USA TODAY Published 11:42 a.m. ET April 25, 2017
636287200549086193-AP-853867846660.jpg


Three Islamic State militants setting up an ambush in a bitterly contested area of northern Iraq were killed by a herd of stampeding boars, local leaders say.

Sheikh Anwar al-Assi, a chief of the local Ubaid tribe and supervisor of anti-ISIS forces, told The Times of London the militants were hiding on the edge of a field about 50 miles southwest of Kirkuk when the boars overwhelmed them Sunday. Five other militants were injured, al-Assi said. He said the group was poised to attack a band of local tribesmen who had fled to nearby mountains since militants seized the town of Hawija three years ago.

“It is likely their movement disturbed a herd of wild pigs, which inhabit the area as well as the nearby cornfields,” he said.

Al-Assi said the militants had summarily executed 25 people attempting to flee the militant's would-be caliphate in the three days before the boars attacked. Hawija, about 100 miles south of Mosul, sees dozens of residents flee to Kurdish Kirkuk daily, and the Iraqi military has planned to launch an offensive in the region after a laborious effort to liberate Mosul is completed.

“We know that a massacre took place in Hawija district through our sources," al-Assi told the Times. "This will not be ISIS’s last massacre against citizens."
Hawija is strategically located east of the road from Mosul to Baghdad, on the edge of the oil-rich region of Kirkuk. U.S.-backed troops launched the effort to drive the militants out of Mosul in October. Eastern Mosul was liberated in January, and the Iraqi military claimed Tuesday it had taken control of the al-Tanek neighborhood, the largest on the western side of the city.

Kirkuk Gov. Najmaldin Karim renewed calls to the Iraqi army and government to free Hawija.

“The suffering of the people of Hawija and its surrounding areas is intolerable,” he told The Times.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He-He...Here we go again
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-hacking-france-macron-20170425-story.html
Russia-linked hackers targeted French presidential candidate Macron's campaign, researchers say
Researchers with the Japanese anti-virus firm Trend Micro say the campaign of French presidential front-runner Emmanuel Macron has been targeted by Russia-linked hackers, adding more details to previous suggestions that the centrist politician was being singled out for electronic eavesdropping by the Kremlin.


The campaign's digital chief, Mounir Mahjoubi, confirmed the attempted intrusions in a telephone interview late Monday but said they had all been thwarted.
"It's serious, but nothing was compromised," he said.
The French presidential race is not yet over. Macron faces far-right rival Marine Le Pen in France's presidential runoff on May 7. Macron favors a strong European Union, while Le Pen wants to pull France out of the bloc, weakening it.

Trend Micro said it discovered the campaign by monitoring the creation of rogue, lookalike websites often used by hackers to trick victims into giving up their passwords. The Tokyo-based firm recently detected four Macron-themed fake domains being set up on digital infrastructure used by a group it calls Pawn Storm, according to Trend Micro researcher Feike Hacquebord.

Mahjoubi confirmed that at least one of the sites had recently been used as part of an attempt to steal campaign staffers' online credentials.
Unmasking which group is behind this or that spying campaign is one of the most challenging aspects of cybersecurity, but Hacquebord said he was confident Trend Micro had gotten it right.

"This is not a 100 percent confirmation, but it's very, very likely," Hacquebord said, adding the political nature of the targeting was "really in line with what they've been doing in the last two years."

Trend Micro has stopped short of accusing any country of pulling Pawn Storm's strings, but American spy agencies and a variety of threat intelligence firms say that Pawn Storm, an extraordinarily prolific group also known as Fancy Bear or APT28, of being an arm of Russia's intelligence apparatus.

French officials have also tended to be more circumspect than their American counterparts, repeatedly declining to tie Pawn Storm to any specific actor.

Russian government officials have long denied claims of state-sanctioned hacking. On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the most recent coverage as "anonymous, unsubstantiated reports."

The Associated Press left several messages with the hacker or hackers who registered the rogue Macron websites. None was returned.
Mahjoubi said the attempts to penetrate the Macron campaign date back to December. In February, the campaign complained publicly of being targeted by Russia-linked electronic spying operations, although it offered no proof at the time.

Trend Micro's report, which was produced independently of the Macron campaign and lists 160 electronic espionage operations across a series of targets, adds a measure of evidence to the notion, even if the fact that the rogue websites were registered in March and April doesn't line up with the campaign's timeline.

The French election, the first round of which Macron won Sunday with just over 24 percent of the vote, has been closely watched for signs of digital interference of any kind.

Many observers feared a repeat of the U.S. electoral contest in 2016, when hackers allegedly backed by Moscow broke into the email inboxes of the Democratic National Committee and other political operatives. Pilfered documents subsequently appeared on WikiLeaks and other more mysterious websites, putting the Democrats on the defensive during their losing campaign against Donald Trump.

Nataliya Vasilyeva in Moscow contributed to this report.

 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He-He...Here we go again
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-hacking-france-macron-20170425-story.html
Russia-linked hackers targeted French presidential candidate Macron's campaign, researchers say
Researchers with the Japanese anti-virus firm Trend Micro say the campaign of French presidential front-runner Emmanuel Macron has been targeted by Russia-linked hackers, adding more details to previous suggestions that the centrist politician was being singled out for electronic eavesdropping by the Kremlin.


The campaign's digital chief, Mounir Mahjoubi, confirmed the attempted intrusions in a telephone interview late Monday but said they had all been thwarted.
"It's serious, but nothing was compromised," he said.
The French presidential race is not yet over. Macron faces far-right rival Marine Le Pen in France's presidential runoff on May 7. Macron favors a strong European Union, while Le Pen wants to pull France out of the bloc, weakening it.

Trend Micro said it discovered the campaign by monitoring the creation of rogue, lookalike websites often used by hackers to trick victims into giving up their passwords. The Tokyo-based firm recently detected four Macron-themed fake domains being set up on digital infrastructure used by a group it calls Pawn Storm, according to Trend Micro researcher Feike Hacquebord.

Mahjoubi confirmed that at least one of the sites had recently been used as part of an attempt to steal campaign staffers' online credentials.
Unmasking which group is behind this or that spying campaign is one of the most challenging aspects of cybersecurity, but Hacquebord said he was confident Trend Micro had gotten it right.

"This is not a 100 percent confirmation, but it's very, very likely," Hacquebord said, adding the political nature of the targeting was "really in line with what they've been doing in the last two years."

Trend Micro has stopped short of accusing any country of pulling Pawn Storm's strings, but American spy agencies and a variety of threat intelligence firms say that Pawn Storm, an extraordinarily prolific group also known as Fancy Bear or APT28, of being an arm of Russia's intelligence apparatus.

French officials have also tended to be more circumspect than their American counterparts, repeatedly declining to tie Pawn Storm to any specific actor.

Russian government officials have long denied claims of state-sanctioned hacking. On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the most recent coverage as "anonymous, unsubstantiated reports."

The Associated Press left several messages with the hacker or hackers who registered the rogue Macron websites. None was returned.
Mahjoubi said the attempts to penetrate the Macron campaign date back to December. In February, the campaign complained publicly of being targeted by Russia-linked electronic spying operations, although it offered no proof at the time.

Trend Micro's report, which was produced independently of the Macron campaign and lists 160 electronic espionage operations across a series of targets, adds a measure of evidence to the notion, even if the fact that the rogue websites were registered in March and April doesn't line up with the campaign's timeline.

The French election, the first round of which Macron won Sunday with just over 24 percent of the vote, has been closely watched for signs of digital interference of any kind.

Many observers feared a repeat of the U.S. electoral contest in 2016, when hackers allegedly backed by Moscow broke into the email inboxes of the Democratic National Committee and other political operatives. Pilfered documents subsequently appeared on WikiLeaks and other more mysterious websites, putting the Democrats on the defensive during their losing campaign against Donald Trump.

Nataliya Vasilyeva in Moscow contributed to this report.
Deep State doubling down on propaganda to start a war with Russia to break the Russia - China gold backed currency trading pact bypassing the US Petro Dollar because they know it will make the Dollar crash. Other countries that announced they were going off the US Petro Dollar: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iran - (until Anit-Nuke Deal) - anyone noticing a trend here?

Globalists would much rather fight in Syria & take on Russia alone, thereby breaking the pact, allow 2 gas pipeline projects & an "Israeli Oil Field to be developed. But since Trump has not taken the bait, if they have to, they will use Korea to draw us into a war with both. Expect one of the Japanese destroyers (undoubtedly still heavily contaminated with Radiation from Fukushima) to be hit by a "North Korean" missile attack & sunk (but not before aerial shots of the devastation & bodies floating in water are captured by a CNN Film crew conveniently on the Nuclear sniffer Plane that detects the radiation from the ship). They will blame a tactical Nuke. That will be the first False Flag.

It is the second false flag we need to worry about. That will be an attack on the US. Federal Emergency preparedness drills were conducted prior to Oklahoma City and WTC - training for the scenarios that eventually occurred. During 911, the Military Air Force Rapid response fighters were on an Emergency Preparedness drill over Atlantic and fighters had to be scrambled from Boston to DC to fly cover (they too were mysteriously diverted over Atlantic to a holding area so they could not intercept the attack on Pentagon).

Feds are currently running Emergency Preparedness Drills in certain areas of US with the scenario of a Dirty Bomb Radiological or Nuclear attack. If I lived in one of these cities, I would consider a trip to a remote resort. The scenario of a dirty bomb smuggled in a container ship from South Korea by nefarious NK Agents who will be identified in record time is all too real.
 
Last edited:

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/business/chobani-alex-jones.html?_r=0
Chobani Yogurt Sues Alex Jones Over Sexual Assault Report
By CHRISTINE HAUSERAPRIL 25, 2017
Chobani, the yogurt company, has filed a lawsuit against Alex Jones, the high-profile conspiracy theorist and the host of a popular right-wing radio show, for posting what it called false news reports about the company and its owner.

The suit, filed on Monday in district court in Twin Falls County, Idaho, named Mr. Jones and the media companies InfoWars and Free Speech Systems as defendants. It called “false” and “defamatory” several reports that appeared on InfoWars alleging that the company’s factory in Idaho, which employs refugees, was connected to a 2016 child sexual assault and a rise in tuberculosis cases.

The reports were published April 11 on InfoWars.com and on “The Alex Jones Channel” on YouTube. They were promoted on Twitter under the headline “Idaho Yogurt maker Caught Importing Migrant Rapists,” and were spread widely online.

The founder of Chobani, Hamdi Ulukaya, a Turkish immigrant of Kurdish descent, has been the target of right wing threats by people who accuse him of employing too many refugees in his factories, which began as a yogurt business in upstate New York and then expanded to Twin Falls, a city of about 46,500 south of Boise.
Mr. Ulukaya became the target of anti-immigrant ire after he stepped up his advocacy of refugees — employing more than 300 of them in his factories, and starting a foundation to help migrants. He and his company have been targeted with racist attacks on social media and conspiratorial articles on websites including Breitbart News.
 

HazyShades

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ente...5405f56d3e4_story.html?utm_term=.b7cf6367f778

Right-wing radio host Alex Jones responds to Chobani lawsuit
By Associated Press April 25 at 6:30 PM
BOISE, Idaho — Right-wing radio host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones says he’s not backing down in response to a defamation lawsuit filed by Greek yogurt giant Chobani.

Jones, in a video posted on his Youtube channel Tuesday, said with no proof that billionaire George Soros was behind the lawsuit. Soros, who Jones called a “Nazi collaborator,” is not named in the lawsuit.

According to the lawsuit, Chobani argues that Jones and his InfoWars website posted fabricated stories earlier this month that linked Chobani owner Hamdi Ulukaya and the company to a sexual assault case involving refugee children. The company filed the lawsuit in Idaho District Court in Twin Falls, where it operates the largest yogurt plant in the world.

It’s seeking at least $10,000 in damages.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/business/chobani-alex-jones.html?_r=0
Chobani Yogurt Sues Alex Jones Over Sexual Assault Report
By CHRISTINE HAUSERAPRIL 25, 2017
Chobani, the yogurt company, has filed a lawsuit against Alex Jones, the high-profile conspiracy theorist and the host of a popular right-wing radio show, for posting what it called false news reports about the company and its owner.

The suit, filed on Monday in district court in Twin Falls County, Idaho, named Mr. Jones and the media companies InfoWars and Free Speech Systems as defendants. It called “false” and “defamatory” several reports that appeared on InfoWars alleging that the company’s factory in Idaho, which employs refugees, was connected to a 2016 child sexual assault and a rise in tuberculosis cases.

The reports were published April 11 on InfoWars.com and on “The Alex Jones Channel” on YouTube. They were promoted on Twitter under the headline “Idaho Yogurt maker Caught Importing Migrant Rapists,” and were spread widely online.

The founder of Chobani, Hamdi Ulukaya, a Turkish immigrant of Kurdish descent, has been the target of right wing threats by people who accuse him of employing too many refugees in his factories, which began as a yogurt business in upstate New York and then expanded to Twin Falls, a city of about 46,500 south of Boise.
Mr. Ulukaya became the target of anti-immigrant ire after he stepped up his advocacy of refugees — employing more than 300 of them in his factories, and starting a foundation to help migrants. He and his company have been targeted with racist attacks on social media and conspiratorial articles on websites including Breitbart News.
You know this Turkish pig immigrated here..and some how which I'd love somebody explain to me...I heard he sit on the board of the NY Federal Reserve Bank......that's one unbelievable rags to riches story....
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Keep reading around, he's starting to "reconsider" the wall also
Yeah it appears he's a liar and a traitor...the globalist agenda is back on track...what's also interesting isw what the DNC has been doing....don't you find it odd that the DNC can find judges to stop the travel bans and the lawsuits against sanctuary cities,....but somehow the DNC were just fine with bombing Syria and sabre ratteling with north korea....it's as if Washington DC is just one big happy family.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/business/chobani-alex-jones.html?_r=0
Chobani Yogurt Sues Alex Jones Over Sexual Assault Report
By CHRISTINE HAUSERAPRIL 25, 2017
Chobani, the yogurt company, has filed a lawsuit against Alex Jones, the high-profile conspiracy theorist and the host of a popular right-wing radio show, for posting what it called false news reports about the company and its owner.

The suit, filed on Monday in district court in Twin Falls County, Idaho, named Mr. Jones and the media companies InfoWars and Free Speech Systems as defendants. It called “false” and “defamatory” several reports that appeared on InfoWars alleging that the company’s factory in Idaho, which employs refugees, was connected to a 2016 child sexual assault and a rise in tuberculosis cases.

The reports were published April 11 on InfoWars.com and on “The Alex Jones Channel” on YouTube. They were promoted on Twitter under the headline “Idaho Yogurt maker Caught Importing Migrant Rapists,” and were spread widely online.

The founder of Chobani, Hamdi Ulukaya, a Turkish immigrant of Kurdish descent, has been the target of right wing threats by people who accuse him of employing too many refugees in his factories, which began as a yogurt business in upstate New York and then expanded to Twin Falls, a city of about 46,500 south of Boise.
Mr. Ulukaya became the target of anti-immigrant ire after he stepped up his advocacy of refugees — employing more than 300 of them in his factories, and starting a foundation to help migrants. He and his company have been targeted with racist attacks on social media and conspiratorial articles on websites including Breitbart News.
the NYT is such a globalist shit rag.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top