Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

hellcatrydr

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So maaany democrims.
I am stunned that anyone could be dumb enough to still be hypnotized by the Pie in the Sky party.
 

HondaDavidson

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So maaany democrims.
I am stunned that anyone could be dumb enough to still be hypnotized by the Pie in the Sky party.
I don't know...... it was predicted during the formation of this country. Is even the cause of the failure of several early colonies and settlements..... particularly those established under socialistic principles. It's also why the left likes to erase history.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Dems rejoice

HallE20171216_low.jpg
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
now if this ain't an oppurtunity for the kekistan army to get out and troll I don't what would be...can you imagine the fun it would be.

8o3trx085qry.png

/Pol/ seems to be getting a bit on the Dark Side lately when you see an All You Want for Christmas Thread with McCain memed into a coffin with a Santa Hat.
 
Last edited:

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Bernie Sanders concedes defeat on tax reform
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/b...-did-everything-that-we-could/article/2643763

“The way this bill is written is the tax breaks for corporations are now permanent, why weren't the tax breaks for middle class made permanent?” he said. “Because it has to do with the priorities of the folks who wrote that legislation. And their job is to represent multi-national corporations, not working families. That's where we are today.”
Because that would have required 60 votes in the Senate and not a single fucking Democrat was willing to vote for it, not even you, Bernie.
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years

HondaDavidson

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
But they got 60 votes for the permanent reduction in the corporate tax rates?

Or was it all just Republican Reindeer games?
Don't need 60 for corporate yax.... only for individual rates paid via payroll taxes.

Revenues vs earnings..... taxing one takes 50 vote and is permanent the other needs 60 to make permanent.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
 

HondaDavidson

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Don't need 60 for corporate yax.... only for individual rates paid via payroll taxes.

Revenues vs earnings..... taxing one takes 50 vote and is permanent the other needs 60 to make permanent.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
UNLESS bill originates in HOUSE.... then 50 votes would work. Since senate NEVER voted on house bill we get what they offer.... CRAP.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
UNLESS bill originates in HOUSE.... then 50 votes would work. Since senate NEVER voted on house bill we get what they offer.... CRAP.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
So yes Right wing Reindeer games. Collusion between the 2 houses of Republicans as to what got introduced where.... Or which house modified it.....
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So yes Right wing Reindeer games. Collusion between the 2 houses of Republicans as to what got introduced where.... Or which house modified it.....

That's what is called "spin" you and Bernie are trying to pull off. Well, Bernie is spinning, you're just dumb.
 

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
Bottom line: Republicans would have been thrilled to make the individual rate cuts permanent, and the only thing that kept this from happening is that no Democrats in the Senate would vote for ANY tax-cuts at all. NONE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top