building 7 collapsed because the raging internal fire that was being fueled by the
Diesel fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, doesn't even come close. So try again.
Check your pms'
The steel and concrete of the twin towers were literally pulverized as the buildings fell. The only way to "design" a building to do that is to equip it with controlled demolition just in case something happens you can "pull it." So are you saying that when the buildings were built that they pre-installed controlled demolition? I wouldn't call that an impossibility but it sure doesn't prove it wasn't an inside job, quite on the contrary in fact.
the towers were designed to take an impact of a 707 and hurricane force winds.lack of sufficient fire suppression equipment couldn't protect the buildings from the intense heat caused by the aviation fuel. in as much as they were designed to with stand incredible forces it was taken in account as with all modern sky scrapers that if a sufficient force caused enough lateral movement to the buildings to cause a collapse it would would tend to collapse into itself, and not break at the base and fall straight sideways for its whole length. building engineers warned rescue crews a least 20 minutes prior to the collapse the towers were going to collapse by measuring the lateral drift of the towers.this was all reported in the live coverage of the event.which i watched.
Dude, popular mechanics is a fucking rag, NOT a scientific journal, it's the fucking GQ of science, so if you want to put your faith in that shit that's YOUR business. Intelligent people put their trust in REAL scientists, architects and engineers who will gladly explain to you about REAL physics. Okaaay?? Now how about you wait until we start an actual 9/11 thread instead of us continuing this conversation here at the texas juice factory thread.
It's a bunch of small ones rolled up into a fattie with a political wrapper
The Build-A-Burgers are calling all the shots!It's a bunch of small ones rolled up into a fattie with a political wrapper
hey, i didn't start it.
I'm not saying we should end it, just saying it's pointless to do it here. Let's start up a 9/11 thread and we can go at it until the end of time if you like. You can use Propaganda Mechanics as your source and I'll use 2300 ACTUAL architects and engineers as my source
Uh, it's called Newton's Law of Gravity. Maybe you should look it up.
yea,explosives brought down all three buildings,hmmm.
its imploding and collapsing in on itself.Uh, it's called Newton's Law of Gravity. Maybe you should look it up.
Newton's Law of Gravity says this building isn't "falling", it's "exploding"
Um, yes, that's what I am saying. Exactly. You see, there's something called cause and effect. When you push on something, it's mass pushes back. This means that an object with a mass of x can't crush an object with a mass of 3x. It can only crush x amount of it and will leave 2x uncrushed before the two masses neutralize each other. But on 911, the top stories of both twin towers fell, completely crushing all 80 stories below them. It is an impossibility according to the laws of physics.
that makes no sense, 2300 actual architects disagree with you on that one, please share with us YOUR credentials other than propaganda mechanics
no it is not impossible. watch the video. the floors gutted by the fire gave way first. when the the floors above undamaged collapsed through the gutted floors there was nothing to stop them. when the reached the undamaged floors beneath there was enough weight alone to keep the process going with out explosives.
What do you mean there was nothing to stop them? How about eighty intact floors of solid concrete and steel? Look, no hard feelings skoony, if I was upset with every person who refused to recognize common sense and simple physics when regarding 9/11 I'd have to be upset with the vast majority of Americans. But people with advanced degrees who have decades and decades under their belts actually designing buildings disagree with you and you should someday listen to them and consider that you just might be wrong about it all. Now I don't want to spend the rest of the day talking about nine-eleven so if you want the last word go for it, I do suggest at some point we start a thread on the subject though. Happy New Year.
just like the freeway over passes during the California earthquake.with more weight being added with each successive floor there was more than enough inertia to case it to collapse all the way into the sub basements.saying that the buildings were wired with explosives would imply a incredible technical feat using untold amounts of exlosives and thousands of man hours.
I have created an alternative to your thread here http://vapingunderground.com/threads/9-11-was-an-inside-job.44306/
Okay I guess I'll sub both threads for now, but I thought the idea was to get all points of view in one place? This could quickly turn out to be like Fox News (faux news) vs. MSNBC (MSLSD), lol.
Thats what theY want you to believe
Um, so you are okay then with America lying to you about the Gulf of Tomkin incident which started the Vietnam war?
I certainly appreciate your service and sacrifice, as well as others that have ever served.
Happy New Year to you as well. May you and your family enjoy a safe and prosperous new year.The most sensible thing I've seen posted all day. Happy New Year
Not quite correct.. While many vet do get some form of Disability, as a rating, most do not get any money for it as you must be 30% or more service connected disabled to get a check. And that check is small.. very small. This is called Disability Compensation Payments.
these standards are already in place at the local,state and federal levels.
