Bean8379
Silver Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Member For 3 Years
Member For 2 Years
Member For 1 Year
Member For 5 Years
You make a good point. Some things are created to have a function, other things are created just to be. Art for example, is not created with a specific purpose in mind (at least not good art anyway). And by art I mean anything creative like music, painting, poetry, film, etc. The way I view art will always be subject to the interpretation of the viewer. Therefore the function of art is to be interpreted. I don't believe art has one meaning or another, I believe it can be interpreted many different ways. Take a song you like. It might mean one thing to you but it could mean something completely different to someone else. And neither is right or wrong. I view myself as a non-conformist, not because I rebel against society, that is a highly inaccurate definition of non-conformism. To me, being a non-conformist means exercising my right to think, feel, say and do what I choose for myself, separate from everyone else. It doesn't make me better or worse than anyone else, it just means I choose for myself. Everyone else has the right to choose. I am not responsible for their choices, nor are they responsible for mine. And I don't believe in defining and categorizing, especially when it comes to people. I believe that society is a system built to define and categorize in order to define and control. I have rarely seen a situation where defining and categorizing improves the condition of that which is being defined and categorized. When things are made to perform a certain function, I evaluate them based on performing that function, but when things are not created to perform a function, I don't evaluate them at all. They are created just to be so I let them be without worrying about why they need to be. Or at least I try to. Everyone is guilty of some judgment and criticism, we are all human after all.You, sir, are a very developed individual. I also do not own a car; in fact, I own no vehicle at all. I do not own a cell phone, either, nor do I ever watch television. I am about as far as one can get from materialism yet still survive in America. I could be said to be utilitarian as regarding certain objects, but my way of looking at things ignores both form and function; purpose is what really matters to me. If something is created for its form, I admire and appreciate it for its form; likewise, if something is invented for a particular function, I judge its merit on its performance. Form and function are just opposite poles of the same magnet. I only see a magnet. All that really matters to me is what motivation caused it to be. I do realize that things just are (in sort of a tao sense), but intent means everything to me, and supplies me with the criteria with which to evaluate any given thing.