the GOP are focused on getting Hilary elected.I'm still not convinced that there won't be a lot of skullduggery afoot, even with Trumps win in Indiana. Either the GOP goes all in, or they destroy themselves by fighting Trump.
I disagree.Say what you will about Cruz he is and always has been a person of honor. He did the right thing .
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
I'm still not convinced that there won't be a lot of skullduggery afoot, even with Trumps win in Indiana. Either the GOP goes all in, or they destroy themselves by fighting Trump.
Well, that's shocking!!! I'm now a member of the "Elite" for reaching an opinion of my own accord!! YAYYY!!! Do I get to learn the Secret Handshake now too???That's a false narritive being created by the elite....there has been nowhere near the level of violence from Trump supporters as there has been from the left.
I'm not delusional enough to think that reforms are the be-all end-all answer to the problem. But there has to be something done to break the current system. I'm of the opinion that it is the system that allows for the corruption of politicians, not that politicians are corrupt by nature. It's all part of The Game, and the easiest way to change The Game is to change the rules of the game.I'm not so sure that most of the reforms I see proposed would be benifficial. I think many of them will be counter productive.
For instance, term limits. It's great for a President as we don't want a dictator. But it doesn't work out well for me if the electorate finally get their collective heads out of their asses and elect some good reps and term limits knock them out after a few years leaving the office open for corruption again.
I think election reforms, as an attempt to remove corruption that is largely born of a lazy and thus ignorant electorate, will just give the electorate a reason to be even more lazy and ignorant because they will think the reforms have solved the problem. Just as regulation does not give consumers incentive to be informed because they believe the regulations protect them, the same will happen to an electorate that believes reforms protect them from corrupt politicians.
No, while I know I am in the minority with people tired of the corruption, I am not for most of the proposed reforms. I feel they are a crutch to lean on and will make it harder to root out corruption over the long term as the electorate relies on the reforms rather than being actively involved. The corrupt elite will quickly find a way marginalize any effect reforms could serve while the electorate wrap themselves in a false security blanket.
Lee Harvey Oswald was Innocent. Blame the fella's in the car with JFK!
I'm not delusional enough to think that reforms are the be-all end-all answer to the problem. But there has to be something done to break the current system. I'm of the opinion that it is the system that allows for the corruption of politicians, not that politicians are corrupt by nature. It's all part of The Game, and the easiest way to change The Game is to change the rules of the game.
Congress is at the lowest approval rating it's seen in decades. The public is fed up with the whole mess that is professional politics and we're starting to see that embodied with the emergence of a candidate like Trump. I may not care one iota for the man, but I have to admire the fact that he's thrown a big stinky boot in the pot. For that, he has my gratitude.
We don't have true elections as it is, so what's the difference? Anyone running for office at the state or federal level is going to need at least the tacit support of the one of the parties to stand a reasonable chance of making the ballot. The party apparatus spoon-feeds us candidates, not from those that would represent us, but rather those that will toe and support the Party Line. In return, they get the money, the greased palms and back-room deals. Yes, that's a cynical view, but that's The Game I was referring to. The rules need to be changed. How they get changed is another matter. And what they get changed to is yet another matter. Democracy is flexible enough to accommodate and even allow such things to happen. Where you're absolutely correct is that those changes have to come from us, the governed.Um, our system is to elect reps. The electorate does that. Voters. It's actually pretty simple. The only way to change that is to restrict who the voters can vote for. Then we don't have a true election.
No, restricting the electorate by restricting who they can vote for and restricting the electorate by shutting down access to reps through lobby restrictions is ridiculous. You can't take the peoples voice away and still have a government by the people. The people might be stupid, as they've been for some time, but a government by the people for the people requires unrestricted access.
People get what they vote for. Everybody knows Hillary is corrupt, yet millions vote for her. No reform will change that. The only thing that will change that is people not voting for corruption. To pretend some rule will keep the corrupt out is laughable. Believe what you want. People are corrupt by nature. There has never, and will never be, an uncorruptable system. Changing the rules of a game has never made it impossible to cheat. You just find different ways.
And your second paragraph proves my point. The electorate has thrown a big stinky boot in the pot, not Trump. Trump can't vote himself into the nomination. The electorate can produce change, and since there has been no reforms, the change thus far has only come from the electorate. The system can work when the electorate wants it to work. No reforms needed. Just voters that want something other than corruption.
sorry my bad ...misread your post.Well, that's shocking!!! I'm now a member of the "Elite" for reaching an opinion of my own accord!! YAYYY!!! Do I get to learn the Secret Handshake now too???
And how did this jump to being about any purported levels of violence perpetrated by Trump supporters??? I believe I neither mentioned nor inferred anything of the sort. I was speaking solely about the "protesters" at the May Day and Trump rallies respectively and the probability that a respectable portion of them were only there to partake in hooliganism for no other reason than they're idiots.
It's been a slow evolution but in my lifetime there's been Perot,Nadar,Ron Paul, and now Trump and Sanders..I think a helluva alot of people are voting not so much for Trump,but to put a monkey wrench in the control of the Kingmakers. Trump is a protest vote against the control of the parties and people way of saying that they are willing to vote outside of party lines. With the advent of the internet and without the total control of the media by the kingmakers I think people are being more active and better informed....but the power of the propoganda machine is still huge.We don't have true elections as it is, so what's the difference? Anyone running for office at the state or federal level is going to need at least the tacit support of the one of the parties to stand a reasonable chance of making the ballot. The party apparatus spoon-feeds us candidates, not from those that would represent us, but rather those that will toe and support the Party Line. In return, they get the money, the greased palms and back-room deals. Yes, that's a cynical view, but that's The Game I was referring to. The rules need to be changed. How they get changed is another matter. And what they get changed to is yet another matter. Democracy is flexible enough to accommodate and even allow such things to happen. Where you're absolutely correct is that those changes have to come from us, the governed.
The ultimate truth is that whatever faults or problems this economy, government and nation has is not the fault of the liberals or the conservatives.
People who shrill shit like that are mindless turd-hurlers.
Stand up. Go to the mirror. Look at what you see.
That's where the problem is.
We have the government and nation and economy that we created. Through action or inaction - they are one and the same.
Ehh, no worries. No blood, no foul.sorry my bad ...misread your post.
Don't forget John Anderson in that list..It's been a slow evolution but in my lifetime there's been Perot,Nadar,Ron Paul, and now Trump and Sanders..I think a helluva alot of people are voting not so much for Trump,but to put a monkey wrench in the control of the Kingmakers. Trump is a protest vote against the control of the parties and people way of saying that they are willing to vote outside of party lines. With the advent of the internet and without the total control of the media by the kingmakers I think people are being more active and better informed....but the power of the propoganda machine is still huge.
Correct. Kasich has been out of money. That's why he didn't play in Indiana. Cruz blew his wad in Indiana. Even rich GOPe fucks don't like to flush their money.
When Rinse Penis says it's over, it's over.
We don't have true elections as it is, so what's the difference? Anyone running for office at the state or federal level is going to need at least the tacit support of the one of the parties to stand a reasonable chance of making the ballot. The party apparatus spoon-feeds us candidates, not from those that would represent us, but rather those that will toe and support the Party Line. In return, they get the money, the greased palms and back-room deals. Yes, that's a cynical view, but that's The Game I was referring to. The rules need to be changed. How they get changed is another matter. And what they get changed to is yet another matter. Democracy is flexible enough to accommodate and even allow such things to happen. Where you're absolutely correct is that those changes have to come from us, the governed.
The ultimate truth is that whatever faults or problems this economy, government and nation has is not the fault of the liberals or the conservatives.
People who shrill shit like that are mindless turd-hurlers.
Stand up. Go to the mirror. Look at what you see.
That's where the problem is.
We have the government and nation and economy that we created. Through action or inaction - they are one and the same.
I'd ask that you re-read my post, and particularly the last section of it:I'm not sure how 'true elections' is defined. That people fall for lies, deception and false narratives does not imply that the election process is flawed, it implies that the electorate is flawed.
You seem intent on blaming the system for our government. So, you and I can never agree. Before a problem can be fixed, the core reason for the problem must be correctly identified.
The ultimate truth is that whatever faults or problems this economy, government and nation has is not the fault of the liberals or the conservatives.
People who shrill shit like that are mindless turd-hurlers.
Stand up. Go to the mirror. Look at what you see.
That's where the problem is.
We have the government and nation and economy that we created. Through action or inaction - they are one and the same.
That piece of shit wanted to tax vaping products at some ridiculous rate in Ohio the last I heard. Glad that jackass is pouting in a corner somewhere now.As a resident of the state of Ohio, I am glad that Kasich had his beyond sorry ass handed to him courtesy of Trump.
At the minimum he is dangerous.
I also had the displeasure of having to listen to his speech today that was supposed to include the fact that he had gotten his but kicked.
30 minutes of my life that I will never get back.
30 minutes of hot air with him thanking everyone and blowing BS scented smoke up our skirts or kilts depending on your pleasure.
Brought up some drivel about a father that had a son suffering from cancer following him from state to state kinda like some kind of Asshat Messiah for giving him and his son hope.
And a black lady thanking him for "Bringing us all Together".
Where did he bring us all "Together"? At a flipping pancake house as all he has done since he entered the race in July of "15" is eat his way around the country displaying really piss poor table manners much of this being paid by the Ohio taxpayers.
Sorry, but my rant is over now and good riddance to Kasich!
I'd ask that you re-read my post, and particularly the last section of it:
Although not specifically stated, I would include what our electoral system has become in that point. The electorate - over the course of generations - has allowed, aided, abetted and otherwise manufactured the current system for selecting our highest ranking officials. We have allowed two groups to consolidate the power, money and mechanism for placing people on the ballot. The ideal of the Citizen Statesman died long ago because getting into office requires becoming beholden to one of those groups to attain office. That is the system that is broken.
The underlying current that we share and agree on is that it is up to us, the people of the electorate, to change that system if we are dissatisfied with it. And I think that is a growing sentiment in this country. How we accomplish it if that is our goal is open to debate. And experimentation. As I said, our democracy allows for us to change things up when we need to.
^^^THIS^^^The cure for corruption is and always has been to inform the electorate. To sway others. Just as I'm attempting right now. I might fail as I have failed many times in the past but making laws that restrict voters does not make up for my failures. I can't make laws to restrict people from voting for people that I consider corrupt. It's undemocratic. It's not a representative republic if people cannot vote for who they want. It's not a representative republic if people cannot form groups to lobby their reps. It's not a representative republic if the people are restricted.
the job of the president is to play golf and throw parties for rappers.
And don't you know that President Carter is thankful that he's now #2 on that list!BHO is the worst president in history....yet the folks trying to rewrite history through common core and their ilk will show him as the best thing since sliced bread.
IMO he's a traitorous scumbag.
LMAO...yes and Huma will take Monica's place
Hey Obama works in entertainment too.Obama on Trump "the job of president is not entertainment " is this guy fucking kidding me !
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk