Tiesto - Red Lights
Because of you I have this cranking now...............
lmao that makes me laugh c:
Awesome piece thanks for sharingChanging it up this morning. Happy Friday!
True, but you look at some artists who just blow and continue to do stuff their own way... ...they make the music they want to make and somehow keep that connection with their fan base. It's very strange how some can and others can't. I personally want to see my favorite underground artists do well and eventually go mainstream. I want as many people to hear and appreciate it as possible. I really don't think its a given that all underground artists have to change their sounds to go mainstream... ...or at least I would hope that it wasn't.
It's sort of a catch 22. You can stay underground and hustle your ass off for a smaller, more dedicated fanbase, or you can sign with a major label and have them handle nitty gritty stuff in exchange for having to do some things that aren't you. I dunno, I'm noticing that some underground artists are given a lot of control by their labels. I think when you already have a strong following, they tend to respect that. They know these artists don't need them as much... ...not when they've been at it for years and people really know who they are and what they're about. Labelscan't look at your sizable, loyal fanbase and tell you "no." Not the smart ones, anyway. It is my hope that things will continue moving in this direction and we'll see more creative control being put back into the hands of the artists.
I'm lucky my kid isn't an indoor kid. She would be outside 24/7 if we let her but with cold Canadian winters and a southern US raised wife who thinks anything below 32F is un-survivable, some time on devices isn't all that bad
Howdy RZ! Settle down there buddy! This stuff is okay.A lot of this guy's music is hit or miss for me. I think all of his albums have golden tracks on them, but there's always some mindbogglingly cringey stuff, too... ...like "How could the guy who make that made... ...THIS?!" level pseudo-melancholic, hallmark store bullshit.
Also, his titles often read like something a teenage wannabe indigo child would come up with. He tries so hard to come up with deep titles for his instrumental tracks... ...and yeah, the music itself can sound incredibly deep, but the titles make him come off like a try-hard. I'm sure he's a really nice guy in person, but he doesn't strike me as being very self-aware.
He's a very talented engineer and often a very tactful composer. It's just that sometimes I think he has skill-blindness. Sometimes he puts so much effort into honing the intricacies and perfecting sound palettes that he doesn't realize he's creating something that just so incredibly cheesy.
Like, he's the kinda guy who spends days perfecting a single pad. And to be sure, his pads and synths are always to perfection (the undisputed master of synth design in his arena, imo,) but sometimes, I don't think he makes the best creative decisions with them... ...I feel like he tries too hard to cram them into certain compositional spaces. Sometimes it works, and I mean... ...it REALLY works. Other times, it really just doesn't, heh.
...but I digress, this one's always just sounded so perfect to me. Not really one of his better tracks, but definitely one of my favorites. The guy makes some of the prettiest, most nuanced IDM you'll ever hear. You can tell he spends a lot of time working with... ...sounds. Everything he does is perfectly stitched together. Nothing out of place is left that way... ...ever. His music has a very detailed, lush, and lively soundstage, and yet everything is so clean and musical. Can't begin to describe the experience of hearing it through a good headphone/amp setup.
Ahh, see, but sometimes I wonder if that's just inevitable. All artists have their peaks. Sometimes looking out at the crowd obfuscates creative intent, but sometimes, I think that perception is simply casual. Maybe not as many mainstream artists as we tend to think decline because they went mainstream and rather because the stuff that got them there marked their peak. You have maybe a few years of being at your best... ...doesn't matter what kind of artist you are. Perhaps once many of these newly-mainstream artists hit that peak, they simply didn't have the motivation to create anymore, but pressed on for the sake of their own livelihood. Going mainstream is a symptom rather than a cause.I'm glad that some of my favorite bands never made it big like that or to the point where they went so big, they went mainstream and not so good at their craft anymore.
'sup Hypno! It's been a minute. Good to see you here again!Howdy RZ! Settle down there buddy! This stuff is okay.
No my friend, I don't think you git it....Ahh, see, but sometimes I wonder if that's just inevitable. All artists have their peaks. Sometimes looking out at the crowd obfuscates creative intent, but sometimes, I think that perception is simply casual. Maybe not as many mainstream artists as we tend to think decline because they went mainstream and rather because the stuff that got them there marked their peak. You have maybe a few years of being at your best... ...doesn't matter what kind of artist you are. Perhaps once many of these newly-mainstream artists hit that peak, they simply didn't have the motivation to create anymore, but pressed on for the sake of their own livelihood. Going mainstream is a symptom rather than a cause.
Some of it comes back to whole talent vs. skill debate.
A proficient artist can consistently put out work that is definitively theirs in that their specifically honed skill-set is shown in all that they do. It defines the character of their music. With enough dedication, literally anybody can acquire skill. Whether or not the product is intrinsically unique or particularly enjoyable is irrelevant when your skill-set is sufficient enough to carry your music. This is usually done by acquiring a skill that only you have... ...or using skills that others have in ways that nobody else ever does.
Every time those people put something out, it leaves the same impression on people and they go in for that... ...especially those who are intimately familiar with their work and appreciate the display of skills. Since they can go on and on that way, they can obtain popularity just by way of exposure. The appeal of skill-born music is easy to grok. It's something that people can immediately recognize and appreciate, even if the melodies themselves are nothing special. I think a lot of mainstream artists are this way. Something that is merely the product of a skill is repeatable - that is extremely important when it comes to longevity.
Talent, like genius, is fleeting. Artists themselves do not posses it anymore than they have any control over it. They merely walk alongside of it from time to time. It's not something that can be taught. You can acquire a deep understanding the logic of music and how to apply it practically to get musical results every time, but that doesn't mean you can cultivate a sound that that taps into people's emotions or string together uniquely compelling arrangements. Take the videos of kids playing, note-for-note, very difficult and iconic songs... ...stuff that moves nations. It gets a lot of attention, but at the end of the day, it has no soul.
Or maybe children of musicians, who under the wing of their parents, have amassed immense amounts of skill, but fall short because they have no sense of individuality - no voice of their own. They don't stand out from other musicians, who have also been similarly influenced to acquire the same skills, but perhaps have more identity. That is the difference between talent and skill.
Unfortunately, talent tends to be limited. Many underground artists are more on the "talent" end of the spectrum, which makes them too inconsistent to gather a broad appeal. That's not to say they can't be very skilled... ...it just isn't the main selling point. People tend not to notice them because they don't necessarily hear what they've come to expect from more popular, by-the-book musicians. But every now and again, they'll strike a very special chord with people and gather a dedicated audience. But since they can't maintain that creative output, their success is limited to that audience. Even the audience they do have may turn around and hate their next album, yanno? Rely too much on your talent and you'll never burst through. I don't really see it as a positive or negative thing. Just differences in attitudes among artists.
I dunno, the two aren't mutually exclusive... ...just something I'm coming to notice about different artists. Obviously there's a lot more to it than that. A lot of times, I notice that it tends to shake down like this.
1. Talented underground artist produces ground breaking work.
2. Inspired by the results, they delve deeper and in doing so, amass a following.
3. The ride the wave following for a while and either
a. stagnate/run out of material to appease their audience and die underground with a handful of die-hard fans preserving the legacy.
b. rest on the laurels of skills acquired through the endeavor and produce music with wider appeal using the existing fanbase as a platform
'sup Hypno! It's been a minute. Good to see you here again!
"Settle down!" he says... ...sir, I do not own a ranch, so I couldn't - even if I wanted to. I enjoy the guy's music... ...that doesn't stop me from criticizing him as an artist, though. When you listen to anything enough, you're going to find things you dislike about it. That's the price of figuring out what makes you like it!
I get it though... ...I never shut up, do I?
I could babble on, but I won't.
...It's not Krimson.