UncleRJ
Will write reviews for Beer!
Staff member
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Reviewer
Moderator
Better ask Tip Rippers what to do about that![]()
I he selling a cream for that now?

Better ask Tip Rippers what to do about that![]()

Hhhmmm... I had actually intended equipment when I wrote that, Huck, but I quite take your point. The simple fact, however, is the mere existence of the regulations creates a black market, with concurrent incentive to smuggle, and it is a physical fact glacial nic is less bulky than dilute in identical quantity. Thus, it seems to me, the potential deaths are more properly blamed on FDA than anywhere else, just as the deaths that will result by restricted access to effective vaping products. I further think one mitigating factor will be smuggled nic will be very valuable, and will thus be carefully packaged.
How can they afford to? They'll be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to get their current products approved. Most places, can't even afford to do that alone. Sending us back to what was available in 2007 is the polar opposite of innovation. Thousands of businesses will be closing up shop, their employees left without jobs, healthcare, etc... Current smokers will have nothing more than cigalikes to try and stop smoking. When they get disappointed with how ineffective those can be for many people, what will they do? They won't have better equipment available to them anymore.For example, a company may be more willing to invest the additional resources needed to ensure that its product is designed and manufactured with appropriate methods and controls."
It may be so. I, for one, am not encouraged, but it is entirely possible I am wrong.The FDA addresses the black market issue in the regs, I know it doesn't address your issue though:
"(Response) FDA understands these concerns, but believes that this rule will not increase current illicit practices or create new illicit markets, because FDA is not banning any tobacco product with this deeming rule. FDA believes that this rule will not stifle innovation but could, instead, encourage it. The greater regulatory certainty created by the premarket review process may encourage companies to invest in creating potentially beneficial novel products, with greater confidence that improved products will not be competing against equally novel, but more dangerous, products. For example, a company may be more willing to invest the additional resources needed to ensure that its product is designed and manufactured with appropriate methods and controls."
I just like that they mention that they believe that these regs "will not stifle innovation but could, instead, encourage it." Sounds encouraging to me that they would add such a concession to the regs.
The FDA addresses the black market issue in the regs, I know it doesn't address your issue though:
"(Response) FDA understands these concerns, but believes that this rule will not increase current illicit practices or create new illicit markets, because FDA is not banning any tobacco product with this deeming rule. FDA believes that this rule will not stifle innovation but could, instead, encourage it. The greater regulatory certainty created by the premarket review process may encourage companies to invest in creating potentially beneficial novel products, with greater confidence that improved products will not be competing against equally novel, but more dangerous, products. For example, a company may be more willing to invest the additional resources needed to ensure that its product is designed and manufactured with appropriate methods and controls."
I just like that they mention that they believe that these regs "will not stifle innovation but could, instead, encourage it." Sounds encouraging to me that they would add such a concession to the regs.
It may be so. I, for one, am not encouraged, but it is entirely possible I am wrong.
And we are supposed to believe that bull shit vs what the regs say and the history of how many apps the FDA has approved in the last few years?
1 approved, hundreds pending for years and now after 1 year pending you have to pull your product from the market.
Pretty much the same types of responses I've gotten on other forums. I don't expect anyone to believe the "bull shit", however, it's kind of hard to ignore when it's in black and white. I'm not trying to convince anyone the regs are a good thing, but hey, it's the government, did you expect anything less?
I'm just tryin' to spread a little sunshine on a cloudy day, not pump sunshine up your azz!
"...if you live feeling like your glass is half empty, well,It may as well be empty all the way."
Author: Mattie J.T. Stepanek
ummm regulations maybe ... but this is not regulation.Pretty much the same types of responses I've gotten on other forums. I don't expect anyone to believe the "bull shit", however, it's kind of hard to ignore when it's in black and white. I'm not trying to convince anyone the regs are a good thing, but hey, it's the government, did you expect anything less?
I'm just tryin' to spread a little sunshine on a cloudy day, not pump sunshine up your azz!
"...if you live feeling like your glass is half empty, well,It may as well be empty all the way."
Author: Mattie J.T. Stepanek
The Democrats are handing vaping over to BT, plain and simple. Vaping as we know it will be gone. You will be forced to vape the way BT wants you to.ummm regulations maybe ... but this is not regulation.
this is a lot of strategery to make vaping to expensive for a company that makes the gear we use to financially burdensome to continue
Not taking up for the Demoncrats but they control neither house of congress.The Democrats are handing vaping over to BT, plain and simple. Vaping as we know it will be gone. You will be forced to vape the way BT wants you to.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
They controlled the House for the 2009 Family Tobacco Act which this is all predicated on. The Democrats have overwhelming support for the FDA Regs. Very few Republicans are behind this. Go to Grimm Greens website. He lists them all. It's a fact that most Vapers just don't want to admit. The Democrats are not your friends on this issue at all.Not taking up for the Demoncrats but they control neither house of congress.
No one in government is my friend.They controlled both the House and Senate for the 2009 Family Tobacco Act which this is all predicated on. The Democrats have overwhelming support for the FDA Regs. Very few Republicans are behind this. Go to Grimm Greens website. He lists then all. It's a fact that most Vapers just don't want to admit. The Democrats are not your friends on this issue ar all.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
Just a way to avoid putting the the blame squarely where it belongs which is with the Dems. People will do anything to hold on to their political beliefs even if it means sacrificing their own personal freedom.No one in government is my friend.
And it is up to those in control in congress on the bill and amendment currently in congress as to whether they pass or not.
We can play the blame game that those in power want us to play or we can move forward.
This. But most won't get it.Just a way to avoid putting the the blame squarely where it belongs which is with the Dems. People will do anything to hold on to their political beliefs even if it means sacrificing their own personal freedom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N915A using Tapatalk
No, I won't.You will be forced to vape the way BT wants you to.
Voting record for 2009 Tobacco control act.
Senate:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...te_cfm.cfm?&congress=111&session=1&vote=00207
House:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll187.xml
Same here. I gots all I need.No, I won't.
BT will never get another dime out of me. Goobermint will never get another penny in tobacco sin taxes. And I will vape the way I want, for the rest of my life. Screw both of them.
So some vote one way but do not have the balls to come out and say they are against vaping?
Voting record for 2009 Tobacco control act.
Senate:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...te_cfm.cfm?&congress=111&session=1&vote=00207
House:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll187.xml
Yep I saw that Makes no nevermind to me since I follow neither party. I go where I want and follow none.Have you even looked at the stats you posted? Anyone can see that the anti vaping vote is clearly and overwhelmingly Democratic. In the Senate 16 out of the 79 Yeas were Republican. That means 63 Dems voted for it. In the House 228 of the 298 Yeas were Democrats. Again overwhelming Democratic support.
Bro, nobody said you weren't informed so take it easy. What I was trying to convey was that we all need to keep vapers informed as to where these politicians loyalties are. Never meant to insinuate that you were uninformed.Informed? I read that entire damned Deeming regs thing.
Written all my senators and reps. BTW my 2 republican senators are in the pocket of BT.
Belong to CASA, etc.
done numerous surveys and petitions.
But in the end I see the writing on the wall and have prepped for the rest of my life on vaping stuff.
Faith does not trump reality.
I do hope for the benefit of others that I am wrong on our govt and vaping and will gladly admit to being wrong if proven to be so.
I'm all good with the sunshine. But ask me, the fix is in.Pretty much the same types of responses I've gotten on other forums. I don't expect anyone to believe the "bull shit", however, it's kind of hard to ignore when it's in black and white. I'm not trying to convince anyone the regs are a good thing, but hey, it's the government, did you expect anything less?
I'm just tryin' to spread a little sunshine on a cloudy day, not pump sunshine up your azz!
"...if you live feeling like your glass is half empty, well,It may as well be empty all the way."
Author: Mattie J.T. Stepanek
Yes I admit I'm a broken record, but only thing we can do is contact our Representatives and Congressman regularly (at least twice a month). Put them on notice that if they support the FDA regulations or do nothing about them we will actively work to replace them.I'm all good with the sunshine. But ask me, the fix is in.
Doesn't matter. the extremely cumbersome and costly approval process for each ejuice mix will ensure that in 2 years very few flavors are sold.
Tough crowd here. I don't know why I even bother posting anything. Ignore my links since it's unworthy. I won't bother posting in this thread.Doesn't matter. the extremely cumbersome and costly approval process for each ejuice mix will ensure that in 2 years very few flavors are sold.
Only ones available will be pre 2007, you know the ones Big Tobacco markets.Doesn't matter. the extremely cumbersome and costly approval process for each ejuice mix will ensure that in 2 years very few flavors are sold.
I don't think there is a final verdict just yet. - if there is I would not believe it unless I saw it on a legal docCan someone please clear something up for me...come August can vape shops replenish their inventory with what's already on the market, or can they just sell what's left in the store?
The cannot sell anything in the store that is not properly labelled and in child proof container if ejuice. And they will require photo ID proof of age to sell any vape stuff.Can someone please clear something up for me...come August can vape shops replenish their inventory with what's already on the market, or can they just sell what's left in the store?
Those goof-balls don't read the emails or letters, their gophers respond, with canned messages, sometimes not even the right canned message. McCain sent me a canned message a couple weeks ago, telling me to write to the FDA before July 2nd 2015...or some date, forget now, but the wrong year. Some idiot sent the wrong canned message. Worthless bastards....!Yeah I'm posting the Royal Collage of Physicians piece on Senator Patty Murry's FB page where she announced she's running for re-election (I fully expect it to be deleted). I stated that my vote depends directly on who supports the FDA. She's on the oversight committee for the FDA. I write her regularly and always get the standard canned response. Everyone needs to hammer these politicians on a regular basis, let them know their opinion/vote on the FDA ban will directly affect your vote. Also site the actual science supporting Vaping.
Those goof-balls don't read the emails or letters, their gophers respond, with canned messages, sometimes not even the right canned message. McCain sent me a canned message a couple weeks ago, telling me to write to the FDA before July 2nd 2015...or some date, forget now, but the wrong year. Some idiot sent the wrong canned message. Worthless bastards....!
I soooo did not want to earn to DIY juices, but looks like we won't have a choice - only the really big juice companies are going to be able to comply - most of the juices I like are from smaller companies or vape shops.
Be a Vapocalypse Prepper.Well more news for those who believe they have another two years to stock up. Just got from Reddit that Pennsylvania just passed an immediate 40% wholesale tax on anything vape related. If that wasn't bad enough they also included an additional 40% floor tax which pretty much kills all the B&M's in that state.
Hey, it's for the children!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
damn! Sounds like they're getting really desperate to save the tobacco sales. Next will be a lowering of taxes on cigarettes.Well more news for those who believe they have another two years to stock up. Just got from Reddit that Pennsylvania just passed an immediate 40% wholesale tax on anything vape related. If that wasn't bad enough they also included an additional 40% floor tax which pretty much kills all the B&M's in that state.
Hey, it's for the children!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Thank goodness I live in a fairly vape-friendly state that has made a legal distinction between the two. It's a travesty (and a crime against society) that the FDA and so many state governments are so eager to keep people smoking. First the FDA tried to blockade all imports of vaping items. When that failed, they decided to try this current bullshit.People who live in states with vape-related taxes should be aware: If the deeming regs stand as published, states will be able to collect the state vape tax from out-of-state online purchases under the federal Jenkins Act - which is how they are able to collect local taxes on out-of-state online purchases of actual tobacco.