|
|
Here is *my chart* of all the ways the globalists are trying to destroy our society, values, norms, traditionsI'm up to 33 ways and asking for more ideas
|
| ||||||
Last week on TikTok, I posted several videos, including this one on the best Diet for Candida. | |
Click here to follow me on TikTok! |
| ||
|
|
What Can Congress Do?And what can YOU do? Tell THEM what to do. Over and over. I wrote these.
2. Revoke the 2005 PREP Act, which allows experimental products to be used on the entire population, potentially with no testing or minimal testing, and removes liability from the manufacturer, the government, those performing vaccinations and everyone involved. (This domestic law, which created the Emergency Use Authorization, is needed so the WHO can legally order untested drugs and vaccinations on the US population, as specified in the October 2023 pandemic treaty draft.) 3. Revoke all legislation passed in the wake of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that allowed Constitutional protections to be suspended for emergencies and funded misguided pandemic preparedness efforts. Project Bioshield, etc.) 4. Encourage the states to revoke the Model State Emergency Health Powers Acts and similar legislation that was authored by George Washington Professor Lawrence O. Gostin under a CDC contract, passed by the states, and which has allowed governors to rule by decree during designated emergencies. 5. Exit and defund the WHO--support HR-79. 6. Require Senate ratification of all treaties with the WHO and other UN agencies. The IHRs have been adopted in the US by "executive agreement." According to the Congressional Research Service, "an executive agreement is a type of treaty from an international law perspective..." yet it does not require Senate advice and consent. Congress should demand that the IHR Amendments, as well as the Pandemic Treaty, require Senate ratification. Simply because an earlier version of this treaty was signed by executive branch agreement, there is no reason that massive revisions of the treaty also should evade Senate scrutiny. In fact, in Article 36 the treaty itself calls on state parties to ratify it. This is particularly important in light of the WHO's plan to withhold the negotiated IHR Amendments from the public and all member states in January, as required by the IHR, and continue work on them until, potentially, they have been passed by the World Health Assembly in May. At which point, presumably, we will learn what our nations have signed up to after the fact. 7. The negotiations on the IHR amendments are being conducted in secret. A Swedish parliamentarian (Elsa Widding) has challenged Sweden's Health Minister to make the negotiations transparent or resign. Something like this could be demanded of the Biden administration. 8. Withhold all WHO funding in the foreign operations appropriations bill, as did the House in HR-4665. |
|
Better organized New World Dis-Order chart, from a readerVery thankful to readers who help out
|
|
| ||
|
Eight items of major concern regarding the proposed WHO treaty and International Health Regulations (IHR) amendmentsUse as a handout or for conversation starters, like: "Did you know...?". We will post as a pdf handout at DoortoFreedom.org
1. Biological warfare agent proliferation.The treaty and the proposed amendments instruct nations that they must perform surveillance for potential pandemic pathogens, build or maintain sequencing labs, and both share actual specimens with the WHO (where a BioHub has been created for this purpose) and also share the sequences online. This demands the proliferation of biological weapons agents—which I believe is a crime (based on my interpretation of Security Council Resolution 1540 and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention).1 a. The June 2, 2023 "Bureau text" version of the treaty also called for nations performing Gain-of-Function research to reduce "administrative impediments" to the work. In other words, restrictions on the research should be relaxed, which would make lab leaks more likely to occur. This paragraph was removed from the October 30, 2023 version of the treaty. 2. Giving the WHO a blank check to create new rules in the futureThe treaty calls for a Conference of Parties and a new WHO Secretariat to be created in the future that will make rules for how the pandemic prevention and response apparatus will work—which provides essentially a blank, signed contract to the WHO to create whatever rules it wants.3. Liability-free vaccines developed at warp speed will be producedThe treaty calls for rapid vaccine development /production and shaving time off all aspects of vaccine development, testing and manufacture. This requires vaccines to be used without licenses, and the treaty calls for nations to have laws in place to issue Emergency Use Authorizations for this purpose, and to “manage” liability issues. See “The WHO's Proposed Treaty will Increase Man-Made Pandemics” for more information about this. The US, EU and others have specifically called for 100-day vaccine development and an additional 30 days for production of pandemic vaccines. This would allow for no meaningful human testing.4. Human rights guarantees have been removed in the new amendmentsThe amendments removed “human rights, dignity and freedom of persons” from the existing IHR language. Following complaints, this phrase was later inserted into the Treaty--but the treaty may not be accepted in 2024. Meanwhile, the amendments require only a simple majority to pass, are being written in secret, and so it is likely that the most problematic issues will be found in the amendments.5. Social media surveillance and censorship of citizens is requiredBoth the amendments and the treaty call for nation states to perform surveillance of their citizens' social media, and to censor and prevent the spread of information that does not conform to the WHO's public health narratives. Yet the treaty also calls for citizens to be free to access information, while they are to be protected from "infodemics," which are defined as too much information. Citizens must also be stopped from spreading mis- and disinformation.6. We may not learn what is in the amendments until after they are passedThe amendments have been negotiated entirely in secret for the past nine months, while there have been multiple consecutive drafts of the pandemic treaty released to the public during that time. And while the negotiated amendments were to be tabled for public review in January, the WHO's principal legal officer has provided a legal fig leaf to avoid the obligation of making them public 4 months ahead of the vote. Will the public even see the amendments before a vote on them occurs?Why is there such secrecy regarding the proposed amendments? 7. The WHO Director-General could become your personal physicianAccording to the proposed amendments, the WHO D-G would be able to commandeer and move medical supplies from one country to another, decide what treatments can be used, and restrict the use of other treatments.8. When will the WHO be able to use its newly minted powers?The amendments will come into force after a declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is made. However, a declaration of a potential PHEIC will also trigger these powers. The powers can be extended even after a PHEIC is over, as we have seen with COVID and monkeypox (MPOX) declarations by the D-G.The treaty will be in force continuously, requiring no declaration or pandemic to confer new powers to the WHO. Meryl Nass, MD November 13, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would rather take advice from a jungle dweller
The Benefits of Fever
I originally wrote this article 12 years ago. But the topic is so important that I wanted to publish an update spreading the word that, in most cases, there's no reason to fear a fever. Reaching for fever-reducing medications right away is also typically counterproductive and may make it take longer for you to get better.
sometimes jimmi, i wonder just what is the purpose of life?
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Information on my travels and shows and a worthwhile interview on anthrax vaccine, military mandates, and the evolving legal regime on experimental products and mandatesI will probably not post a lot over the next 3 weeks due to a heavy schedule of events
https://rumble.com/v3vl51k-gow-ep2-meryl-nass-m.d.html I travel to Europe tomorrow where I will give talks inside the Parliaments of a) Romania with the International COVID Summit #4, b) Croatia and c) Estonia, and also speak in Italy and Belgium. I will also film a show with James Corbett tonight that will be posted this coming weekend on the CHD-TV site here. As I come to know where interviews are posted I will list them in the substackover the next few weeks, and try to say whether there is something new in them. |
Information on my travels and shows and a worthwhile interview on anthrax vaccine, military mandates, and the evolving legal regime on experimental products and mandatesI will probably not post a lot over the next 3 weeks due to a heavy schedule of events
https://rumble.com/v3vl51k-gow-ep2-meryl-nass-m.d.html I travel to Europe tomorrow where I will give talks inside the Parliaments of a) Romania with the International COVID Summit #4, b) Croatia and c) Estonia, and also speak in Italy and Belgium. I will also film a show with James Corbett tonight that will be posted this coming weekend on the CHD-TV site here. As I come to know where interviews are posted I will list them in the substackover the next few weeks, and try to say whether there is something new in them. |